Obama pledges to quickly sign anti-smoking bill

Huaca

Greenlighter
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
895
Location
Outside the matrix
Yahoo! News
By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
June 13, 2009

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is lauding the passage of historic anti-smoking legislation that gives the government sweeping authority to regulate tobacco products, pledging to quickly sign the measure into law.

"For over a decade, leaders of both parties have fought to prevent tobacco companies from marketing their products to children and provide the public with the information they need to understand what a dangerous habit this is," said Obama, who has struggled for years to kick his own nicotine habit.

The House on Friday gave final approval to the bill after a bitter fight lasting nearly a half-century. The measure for the first time will give the Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate what goes into tobacco products, demand changes or elimination of toxic substances and block the introduction of new products.

Lawmakers and the White House quickly declared it would save the lives of thousands of smokers of all ages. Even more important, they said, the measure could keep countless young people from starting in the first place.

The thousand health and consumer groups that endorsed the bill say that, combined with other anti-smoking efforts, it can significantly reduce the 400,000 deaths and $100 billion in health care costs attributed every year to smoking in the U.S.

Under the legislation:

• Cigarette packages will have warning labels that cover 50 percent of the front and rear. The word "warning" must be included in capital letters.

• Any remaining tobacco-related sponsorships of sports and entertainment events will be banned, as will giveaways of non-tobacco items with the purchase of a tobacco product. A federal ban will be imposed on all outdoor tobacco advertising within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds.

• Point-of-sale advertising will be limited to adults-only facilities, and remaining vending machines will disappear except in places restricted to adults. Retailers who sell to minors will be subject to federal enforcement and penalties.

• Smokers, particularly the younger crowd, will find they can no longer buy cigarettes sweetened by candy flavors or any herb or spices such as strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon or vanilla. Cigarettes advertised as "light" or "mild," giving the impression that they aren't as harmful to health, will no longer be found on store shelves.

With an estimated 3,500 young people smoking their first cigarette each day, the ban on flavorings alone could have significant health benefits, said Dr. Adam Goldstein, director of the University of North Carolina Tobacco Prevention and Evaluation Program.

He said it was not inconceivable that adult smokers, now more than 20 percent of the population, could be reduced to less than 5 percent in 20 years.

Other factors that could cut into tobacco use include the sharp rise in prices — Congress earlier this year approved a 62-cent a pack increase in the federal cigarette tax to pay for a children's health program — and measures by the states to ban smoking in public places.

New FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg said the agency was ready to "roll up our sleeves" to meet the new obligations.

The Senate passed the FDA bill on Thursday by a 79-17 vote and the House followed suit on Friday, with a 307-97 vote.

Marlboro maker Philip Morris USA, the nation's largest tobacco company, came out in support of the bill, saying it was behind tough but fair regulation. Its chief rivals were opposed, saying that FDA restrictions on new products would lock in Philip Morris' share of the market.

Costs of the new program will be paid for by a new user fee imposed on the industry. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that assessments could rise from $235 million in 2010 to $712 million in 2019.
___

The bill is H.R. 1256.
On the Net:
Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

Article Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090613/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_fda_tobacco
 
I support this actually. Regulation ensures safe(r) products.

Some people say the War On Drugs started with the first Pure Food & Drug Act at the end of the 19th century, but I don't agree. This act simply forced manufacturers to list exactly what is in their products (ending the patent medicine era, where anything could be in any product, in any amount).

Similarly, cigarettes have wiggled around this legislation for years; they should be regulated the same as any other drug. We've all heard the disturbing reports of whats been found present in cigarettes.
 
• Cigarette packages will have warning labels that cover 50 percent of the front and rear. The word "warning" must be included in capital letters.



deathcigarettes.jpg


Apparently these things are not healthy?
 
i really don't get it. maybe i'm completely wrong but i've had the understanding my entire life (well as long as i've been able to understand..around 20 years) that cigarettes are bad. they're nasty, unhealthy, make you smell like shit, etc. and i always thought that most people knew this. and even though i never even liked cigarettes and knew they were dangerous i'm still currently a smoker.

man i've seen bags of heroin that were stamped "dead man" "junky" "death" and had skulls and shit on them and me and my friends still bought them without thinking twice. once you are addicted warning labels mean nothing. i mean shit, we were buying bags of random powder from some random stranger on a street corner that were labeled "dead man" and injecting that shit into our veins.

still it's probably good they're doing this, but i'm not really sure it'll have much of an effect...maybe in 20-30 years or maybe it'll just backfire and make smoking/tobacco look super bad ass and cool.
 
This is already common place in many other countries.

Recently passed was a bill called SCHIP, which many of you may thank for the recent increase in cigars/tabacco related products (rolling papers)/ and cigarettes
 
• Smokers, particularly the younger crowd, will find they can no longer buy cigarettes sweetened by candy flavors or any herb or spices such as strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon or vanilla.

Ok, so does this mean that I can't buy cloves anymore? What the fuck is up with that?
 
Ok, so does this mean that I can't buy cloves anymore? What the fuck is up with that?

I believe clove cigars can still be sold, so Djarum should be able to evade this.

I also like how Marlboro fully supports this bill, makes one wonder how much the tobacco lobby had to do with this bill.
 
Sounds like Aussie law to me. The pack's of smokes have warnings on them that take up about 1/4 of the packet and have photos of someones removed cancer or someones cut out eye ball.

The best anti-smoking law the Au gov ever made in my opinion was the no smokeing in pubs and clubs law. Being able to come home smelling normal was great. Even some of the smokers who were against it changed their mind after time. The positive effects from that law were great like really really fucking great.
 
If there's anybody out there who still does not know that cigarette smoking causes serious health consequences, including death, then they ought to just continue smoking in ignorance because no new government regulations are going to make any difference. There will never be a tobacco product that is safe to use and people will continue to use them anyways. We don't need government to get involved in this any further. I think it's hypocritical of Obama to pledge support for government restrictions on a legal product that he uses himself.
 
I don't see a problem with this at all. hopefully all the people who do smoke cigarettes can be reminded once again, and hopefully in a grotesque way with a skull and harm written all over their favorite package that they truly are shaving away years. Tobacco companies are fucking scum. We should support devaluing their product
 
Wow this is bullshit, so no more cigarettes that have flavors, that's fucking stupid. I agree they need to pay attention to their products and the nasty additives they put in (I'd rather smoke the healthiest form of tobacco) I join enjoy smoking occasionally, I enjoy black and milds alot, does that mean they won't have cherry or wine flavors....
 
Regarding this matter: also is supposed to happen is a banning of menthol cigarettes as well as oral tobacco. Even though they are going to raise taxes, that is a shit ton of money to be lost. How the hell is the gov. going to make up for that.

Remember, that is what Hitler done. One of his bills was banning all smoking for the most part.
(watch the obama deception made by alex jones and his buddies) Good lil pieces of info in there.
 
If they ban radioactive fertilizer, that could actually make a big health impact.

The banning of flavorings is silly. It sounds like a plan for Philip Morris, who only makes plain and menthol cigarettes, to legislate competition out of business.
 
Does this mean no more mint snus from Camel?

And by god, if they ban menthol cigarettes, I'll be pissed!:X
 
^They can't ban menthol, the hood will revolt. Lacey K will be posted up in a room across from the white house with a sniper rifle, clutching her newports. :D
 
Top