Sentencing: Obama Administration Tells Congress to End Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity

dhcdavid

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
777
Location
uk
In a break with the Bush administration, Justice Department officials called Wednesday for the first time for Congress to pass legislation that would undo the vast disparities in sentences for those convicted of crack and powder cocaine possession offenses. For years, drug reformers, civil rights groups, and even the US Sentencing Commission have called for the disparities to be undone, saying they have had a racially disproportionate impact on poor and minority communities.

Under federal sentencing laws adopted in the midst of the crack hysteria of the 1980s, it takes 500 grams of powder cocaine to generate a mandatory minimum five-year federal prison sentence, but only five grams of crack to generate the same sentence. Historically, blacks have accounted for more than 80% of all federal crack convictions, with whites accounting for less than 10%.

Competing bills have been introduced to eliminate or reduce the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences, but in previous years they have not gotten far. With the administration now behind eliminating the disparity, this year could be different.

Justice Department Criminal Division Chief Lanny Breuer told a Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee Wednesday that the administration supported bills that would equalize punishments for crack and powder cocaine offenses. The disparity should be "completely eliminated," he said.

"Now is the time for us to reexamine federal cocaine sentencing policy, from the perspective of both fundamental fairness and safety," Breuer told the Judiciary subcommittee on crime and drugs. He added that a Justice Department panel is reviewing a broad range of criminal justice topics, including sentencing reforms.

It's about time, said Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL), the Senate majority whip, citing the racially disproportionate crack conviction figures. "These racial disparities profoundly undermine trust in our criminal justice system and have a deeply corrosive effect on the relationship between law enforcement and minority communities," Durbin said.

US District Judge Reggie Walton, representing the Judicial Conference, also addressed the committee. The crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity is "one of the most important issues confronting the criminal justice system today," he said. "No one can appreciate the agony of having to enforce a law that one believes to be fundamentally unfair to individuals who look like me," said the judge, who is black.

Sentencing reform advocacy groups were also on hand for the hearing. Mary Price, vice president and general counsel for Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM) told the subcommittee the sentencing disparity has a discriminatory impact on blacks, including people like FAMM client Eugenia Jennings, now serving a 20-year prison sentence for twice trading small amounts of crack for designer clothes.

"This hearing gives new hope to thousands who have loved ones serving harsh sentences for low-level, nonviolent drug offenses," said Mary Price, vice president and general counsel at FAMM.

Even former DEA head and enthusiastic drug warrior Asa Hutchinson had little good to say about the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity. "When significant numbers of African Americans on the street question the fairness of our criminal justice system, then it becomes more difficult for the officer on the street to do his or her duty under the law," Hutchinson said.

A number of bills have been filed in both the House and the Senate to address the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Now, the fight will be to ensure that eliminating the disparity means reducing crack sentences, not increasing powder ones.


Sentencing: Obama Administration Tells Congress to End Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity

Drug War Chronicle, Issue #583, 5/1/09

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle...end_crack_powder_cocaine_sentencing_disparity
 
we were talking about this in my political science class the other day actually. I'm glad things are finally looking good for this legislation, it was about time.

Next up, marijuana legalization please :D
 
^^^lolwut?

"A number of bills have been filed in both the House and the Senate to address the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Now, the fight will be to ensure that eliminating the disparity means reducing crack sentences, not increasing powder ones."

I always thought 500 GR's of yaho was a lot of rjust 5 years.. LOL?

Naw I really hope they switch it the other way..
 
lol glassass420 whats not to understand? They said that in the past these types of bills have not had so much luck, but now with the obama administration being a bit more open minded it has a good chance of passing and being signed into law... or did i read it wrong?
 
Now, the fight will be to ensure that eliminating the disparity means reducing crack sentences, not increasing powder ones.
I thought about this the first time I read the article sans commentary from one of the news wires--I guess as long as they are effectively giving people a death sentence (at the very least, assuring that they will be fucked for life after having served decades in prison), they might as well destroy people's lives with equal opportunity.

Here's hoping for the better outcome of the branch-point here...but not expecting much: when politicians attempt to talk about drugs, the outcome is never good (or logical, evidence-based, reasonably sane, not based solely on hysterical paranoia, etc...).

Just like when politicians talk about those wacky tubes we like to call the internet: tubes that terrorists use to insert their genitals right into your living room and your childrens' bedroom.

It would be really funny if we were not choking on reality.
 
Last edited:
I think the objective of the proposed legislation is to bring crack sentencing in line with hcl. However, there are vocal law enforcement organizations that want just the opposite: to bring hcl sentencing in line with current crack sentencing as a means to end the controversial disparity! 8o

It's a mad world, but thank God such zealots don't have total power when it comes to these issues.
 
so which is it? loosen the crack sentencing, or strengthen the cocaine sentencing. I don't get it.
 
They intend, from what I understand, to loosen crack sentencing.

Currently, 5g crack = 5yr MM sentence. 500g hcl = 5yr MM sentence. Federal guidelines, no judicial discretion.

The disparity there is a great representation of the draconian nature of US drug laws. However, the proposed changes are occurring not because the current laws are perceived as draconian, but because they affect African Americans disproportionately.
 
look america has a very high proportion of drug users. the government needs to get over it and let these people have some chance of changing their lifes. if it were up to republicans anyone caught using would be shot, but this is not thailand (where that did in fact happen) and the country need to accept the facts and implement changes that strengthen and improve its population and economy not keep them locked up forever for a crime that for the most part only damages the perpertrators health and wealth (long term that is) at least more than to society.
 
^ Always puzzled me how attempting suicide is no longer illegal in most western countries, yet anything causing lesser damage to the person (ie drugs) were so heavily legislated against. Or is it that we're all so drug addled that we don't see an obvious distinction between the above cases! =D
 
The disparity there is a great representation of the draconian nature of US drug laws. However, the proposed changes are occurring not because the current laws are perceived as draconian, but because they affect African Americans disproportionately.

Good point.
 
I'm all for equality, but this is going to promote the use of crack as opposed to powder. There is a difference in how each form affects behavior.
 
^I'd definitely like to see some case study work on the effects of crack vs. cocaine along those lines. (But how exactly does this promote crack use??) I know a lot of coke and crack users, and I unfortunately know a lot of coke- and crack-heads - the only person to ever rob me of $1500 of my belongings was a crackhead, and I've had both kinds of people in my house with access to my money and belongings... My personal experience has also led me to believe that crack users are more impulsive, more violent, and more strongly addicted more quickly, whereas coke users tend to be longer-term, more social, and more personally destructive as opposed to externally destructive users...). I'd like to see whether those experiences stand up to clinical trial. If they do, I don't believe crack and coke sentencing should be the same.
 
I am unfamiliar with crack completely, and have only done cocaine a few times... and it sucks. None the less, decreasing the penalties on any drug is promoting it, in a manner of speaking.

For example, the [positive] decriminalization of cannabis. As laws slowly become more lenient, recreational use increases.
 
I am unfamiliar with crack completely, and have only done cocaine a few times... and it sucks. None the less, decreasing the penalties on any drug is promoting it, in a manner of speaking.

For example, the (positive) decriminalization of cannabis. As laws slowly become more lenient, recreational use increases.
Yeah, but regardless of the law change, most people aren't waiting until this passes to go score their first 20-rock. I've never smoked crack before, and i'm not about to try it just because the penalty isn't as severe as it used to be. just my 2 cents :)
 
The fairest solution to this problem [barring outright legalization] imo is to equate the sentencing of crack cocaine to powder cocaine based on estimated fair street value as measured by their respective prices in dollars, an objectively measurable standard based on economics.

Using fair market value, the current law punishes crack possesion at a rate roughly 60x that of powder (if 5g's of crack goes for $250 tops while 500g powder goes for $15,000 easily, then 15,000 / 250 = 60). This sentencing situation is clearly unfair, either due to racism--crack is an historically african american drug phenomennon--or crack hysteria, probably a combination of both.

I've snorted [and shot] powder cocaine.hcl plenty of times, and I've smoked crack cocaine plenty of times. Although it sucks to be addicted to either one, the truth of the matter is their highs are not all that different and neither are they impossible to give up. Chemically, the only difference is hcl. Yeah, it's a largely short lived, pointless [and way expensive] high not unlike chemical masturbation, if you will, but let's face it: Masturbation is not a crime!

This situation is like making a $2.50 40oz malt liquor beer being sold at a convenience store in any urban ghetto a draconian felony while tacitly condoning a $150 bottle of merlot being sold in an upscale restaurant. There's no real difference chemically in either scenario!

How is smoking freebase cocaine any better or worse than IV'ing powder cocaine? It's not. They're both addictive drugs, and while either route of administration can lead to grievous harm, either can also lead to great satisfaction.

Do drug prohibition and criminalization really do any good other than to reduce widespread drug experimentation? No.

Would it really be such a bad thing if more people decided to get high by experimenting with psychoactive drugs? No.

Should I really care beyond offering harm reduction advice and letting people learn on their own through personal experience? I think not.

Try reading the book Ain't nobody's business if you do. by Peter McWilliams.

The whole anti-drug war effort would be better directed towards harm reduction, drug legalization and education, drug price and purity regulation, taxing formerly illegal drugs, and teaching drug users moderation, respect for themselves, their families, and their respective drug of choice, and how to best use different drugs responsibly, if at all.

Coca has been used in South America for many millenia, although traditionally only by the ruling monarch classes. Recreational drug use is normal, it's nothing new, it's not going away, and the bottom line is that pleasure in and of itself is not necessarily an intrinsically bad thing.

Society will be much better off in many ways once it learns to incorporate drug usage--including, gasp, crack usage--into its fabric. There's a time and a place for almost everything, and cocaine is not fundamentally different from other legal mind altering substances such as alcohol, coffee, and cigarettes, which have managed to become part of everyday life in our society only because they are not prohibited.
 
Last edited:
^Good stuff! Nice to hear the perspective from someone who has real world experience with both forms. My own observations have led me to conclude that the wide range of behaviors associated with people using cocaine, from those who can keep it within the bounds of completely reasonable moderation to the culturally perceived crackhead, says a lot more about the people who use the drug than the drug itself.

Nor do I think that bringing down the sentences will have any significant effect on use patters, as mrjackjones states. People don't use drugs expecting to get caught; the sentences are of no practical concern beyond a certain threshold. Maybe if crack became a misdemeanor, more people might smoke it, but I actually have a hard time even believing that. This is why harsh sentences are an abominable form of deterrence in my opinion.
 
Well, he may be doing something good here, but he recanted his views on Needle Exchange harm reduction programs.

In his campaign, he made it clear that he would try to lift the federal ban on Needle Exchanges and that he supported them to help stop spread of disease. Now that he's president, those statements have disappeared off of his website and he actually issued a statement that said that he does not support them, or will not allow for them at all in his budget.

Once again, politicians lying to get your vote, and then once they're in office it doesn't matter what they promised.
 
hang on. 500 GRAMS of coke is only a MINIMUM of 5-years?
that's a little over a POUND.
what the fuck? i'd assume a massive distribution charge.
 
Top