egor
Bluelighter
^^gotta love it when people insist on argueing over semantics

Jamshyd said:I do not enjoy arguing over semantics. I simply think this is important because I have seen several people go overkill on K, chasing that ever-elusive "K-hole". It just seems to me like slang that has gotten out of control... like someone saying they find Pot much more enjoyable than Cannabis!
I'm not even delving into that territory man. I don't know your agenda. I certainly don't think it's insidious, and I hope I didn't imply that. It's just the conviction of an agenda in the first place that irks me, really; I'm the type to look at things idealistically. Maybe I'm wrong for that, but I don't think it makes me an asshole.Jamshyd said:Seems to me that all that DMT you've smoked has still not given you a sense of humour. I wouldn't have confessed to having an agenda if I meant to be insidious.
why not say K-hole? That's my only point here and you just made it.Jamshyd said:Yes - a useless word, and there is no point in those. Why not just say "ketamine breakthrough" like you said "DMT breaktrhough"?
I'm using black and white extremes for the sake of making an example. You can substitute any individual characteristic of a DMT breakthrough if it makes you feel better, but the fact remains: a breakthrough has the capacity to be all over the fucking place, but nobody's going to dispute a DMT breakthrough exists, regardless of how individualized the experience is. Right?Jamshyd said:Your analogy is flawed btw. People do not constantly refer to their DMT experiences as "elves".
Of course. But I don't think even erowid provides an adequate explanation of what a K-hole is.egor said:That is just scary with the ammount of info easily available. Did you refer them to erowid?
Jamshyd said:I do not enjoy arguing over semantics. I simply think this is important because I have seen several people go overkill on K, chasing that ever-elusive "K-hole". It just seems to me like slang that has gotten out of control... like someone saying they find Pot much more enjoyable than Cannabis!
Jamshyd said:Of course. But I don't think even erowid provides an adequate explanation of what a K-hole is.
nbsp: Sorry if I misunderstood re: your sense of humour.
----
well, it seems like I've failed to convey why I have objections to this word. I tried my best.
*shrug*
toxide said:In respect to the KHOLE itself, everyone's hole could be different, just like everyone responds differently to drugs, and everyone's brain chemistry is different, like when people claim to see goblins and whatnot when tripping, i think they're completely full of shit, but some people swear that they see this and i can't discount that.
But for anyone to say that "there is no such thing as a K-hole" pretty much proves their ignorance. A K-hole or anyhole off any dissociative is black and white clear cut thing. There's a pretty obvious difference in the line between being really high and being in a hole, Holes can be different but every dissociative has them and it's always crystal clear the point when u go from being high to being stuck in a hole. The only way that this point could be argued IMHO is to not be well experienced in high enough doages of these drugs.
Dondante said:Exactly!!! But I'd add that in addition to sensory shutdown, you have a breakdown of logic and cognitive capabilities. You're shut off from everything that's not you, but you're also shut off from everything that is you. It's a unique balance between brain processes shutting down, but maintenance of awareness/consciousness.