@charlz - I think someone posted the actual papers a few weeks ago and it certainly is interesting. I keep wondering if this could also be explained as a demonstration of a duelist as no mention is made of the NOP receptors which being very similar to the MOR receptor, was only accidentally discovered by Janssen in the 1960s who could not explain the analgesia of a ligand that by rights should not have been as good as it appeared to be. Of course, he then went on record as saying that the scaffold and those related to it were so synthetically challanging that a decision was made to focus on the phenylpiperidine class i.e. phenoperidine --> fentanyl --> carfentanil/alfentanil/remifentanyl i.e. focus on medications for the 'head of the table' i.e. anesthetists.
It wasn't pure pragmatism but the 3,3-diphenylheptanones were still yielding new medicines BUT it ended up with Janssen's new medicines only competition was other Jannsen medicines.
If you look at the code numbers you can at once see just how deeply he mined both scaffolds but equally note how those numbers thin out. If you wish to, you can draw a graph to see just how thinned out it all became.
He was only pipped at the post as greatest Belgian in history because the poll was a Flemish (regional) TV programme. But being runner-up to a saint is possibly a division between faith and science. Only post mortem was he was awarded Most Important Belgian Scientist. I contest he did more good but that's just one opinion.
I suspect his incredible productivity was in pipelining the development i.e. rational design, Dreiding molecular models, intuition, serendipity and as with all things, sheer hard work. Design, hand off to team, test, iterate, repeat. IF you do that at speed you CAN go quite fast. I don't think any faster would have been safe, and from the little I know of the man, he did consider the end user; rare.