• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

Help! Need help remembering THE MOST OBSCURE DRUG YOU NEVER HEARD OF

Whats wild... you can move the indolic nitrogen to what was indoles 3 position to get iso tryptamines. How many compounds did we just calculate?

you can double that number. These are all non haullucinogenic psychoplastogens.

Now move the nitrogen to the 7a, you can double the number again. These may* be active.

Literally 10,000s of LSD analogues
 
Yeah so click link i just semt. Click the lysergamide structure, draw in two ethyl groups on the top N, and then click substructure it shows hundreds amd hundreds
i made my first child, he was beautiful, they will not let me share it, tragic
 
Yeah so click link i just semt. Click the lysergamide structure, draw in two ethyl groups on the top N, and then click substructure it shows hundreds amd hundreds
looking through them and pointing at all the ones i know is a fun game, but yeah theres still so many left
 
was the nboh of lsd never made?
Afaik no. Its likely that the nbome part is too bulky. Even if it is active, it would not be potent and i doubt it would share much of the pharmacology of lsd

Heres how it would look tho. The PEA-NBOME being highlighted in yellow.

 
Afaik no. Its likely that the nbome part is too bulky. Even if it is active, it would not be potent and i doubt it would share much of the pharmacology of lsd

Heres how it would look tho. The PEA-NBOME being highlighted in yellow.


hmm, knowing how bulky some of the nbome's are i'd expect this to be small enough, but i know jack shit about actual relation of activity and molecule structure so i m just blind guessing here
 
hmm, knowing how bulky some of the nbome's are i'd expect this to be small enough, but i know jack shit about actual relation of activity and molecule structure so i m just blind guessing here
Nah its just LSD analogues with substitutions at that spot generally get progressively less potent as the substituents get bigger.

With the exception of ETH-LAD which is more potent than LSD itself. LSD also called METH-LAD
 
hmm, knowing how bulky some of the nbome's are i'd expect this to be small enough, but i know jack shit about actual relation of activity and molecule structure so i m just blind guessing here
Just for future reference we have an entire thread dedicated theoretcical and somewhat masturbatory drawing of chemical structures located here


Its so we dont clutter up threads w nonsense, but in this case the entire thread was nonsense to begin with.
 
Afaik no. Its likely that the nbome part is too bulky. Even if it is active, it would not be potent and i doubt it would share much of the pharmacology of lsd

Heres how it would look tho. The PEA-NBOME being highlighted in yellow.


That is 2-methoxyphenyl, not 2-methoxybenzyl :)
 
Top