I'm sorry you misread, or misunderstood my post. Looking back, I can see exactly how my words led you there. To clarify, I was speaking to the point that many elderly are self-sufficient (exempted from my point about calling in, as they are fully capable), and of the ones who aren't self-sufficient I would expect them to be a bit lost (joke about phone books that no longer exist) and/or having someone that checks on them and would be able to assist. How much of the total population falls into the remaining group of not-self-sufficient and having no-helpers? We don't know, they can't tell us and nobody is checking on them to tell us << another joke, btw.
The SEC's statement was true that 'fraudsters scream loud and immediately'. In no way did I intend to say his statement of fragile old people was true. Or did you not see my opening statement? "For starters, the statement about old people is absurd and shouldn't have been made. At all. It shows a myopic view of our population."
And for being nearly 70, I will say I ain't far behind. My statements on 'some' old people needing assistance or being a bit out of touch is based on my experience. 2 grandparents had alzheimers, as has a parent (yes, I know it is coming) = needing assistance, and having it. That, and being around more and more 'old fragile people' exposes me to the range of those that are self-sufficient and those that aren't. It doesn't change from my semi-joke of either a person can take care of themselves, or they can't and someone would help them, or....who is left after that? YES there are some on SS who cannot take care of themselve and have nobody looking in on them. The first that come to mind would be BLers on disability SS after being ostracized/abandoned by family...but those are still self-sufficient enough to get help if they choose to. So, who is left that is needing help, alone, and unable to call if there is an issue?
You prove the point - YOU ARE self-sufficient. For those you know that are alone, if they are working with you a) you would know if something is wrong with them and b) their working = self-sufficient for gettting help.
As to your first comment, neither myself (and I assume) the SEC person are in any way trying to demean or belittle older folks. His entire point was fraud will be found quickly when they scream about being cut off. If a legitmate recipient is accidently cut off, do you believe they wouldn't get turned back on immediately?