Methamphetanonymous
Bluelighter
Why is this such a prevalent belief among users both active and recovered of methamphetamine? I'm pleased that I don't see this mentioned often or maybe at all here on Bluelight, but it along with the frustrating myth that meth carries no withdrawal symptoms are all over other online and in person communities of meth users.
The logic being that meth users die of other conditions caused by using meth like heart failure stroke and rhabdomyolysis, whereas opioid overdose deaths are caused directly by the drugs effect on respiratory failure. How does this make any kind of sense? If a new user takes 500mg of meth and it causes them to have a stroke or a fatal blood clot, is that not just as much caused by the meth as respiratory failure is caused by opioids?
Meth overdose death isn't even exceptionally rare, and is the second most common culprit of death from overdose in the USA. Meth kills perfectly efficiently on its own, not just when paired with other drugs in a cocktail. It kills otherwise perfectly healthy individuals, and it can kill from the very first dose a person takes not just from a dose after years of physical deterioration from long term heavy use.
It is an insanely powerful drug that surges the body with adrenaline in a fight or flight state biologically intended to last a few moments that is stretched into hours and days. Although it may be true that cocaine is more cardiotoxic than meth, methamphetamine is PLENTY brutal on the cardiovascular system as coke and need not be softened by a comparison of a drug that is somehow even worse on the heart. Prescription doses of amphetanine are typically within the 20-40mg range but recreational methamphetamine users are no strangers to taking the equivalent of a months worth of Adderall in a single day or even a single shot.
Where did this notion come from? Why is it so persistent? Overdose deaths from meth use are skyrocketing as purity, availability and affordability continue to increase globally. The more pure the meth becomes, the more dangerous to the body and mind it too becomes.
And meth definitely has a very unpleasant acute withdrawal period, sometimes followed by its famously bleak and lengthy PAWs depression and cognitive difficulty. Just because the cause of this withdrawal is a rebound of bodily needs rather than a physical dependency developing like GABA drugs and opioids doesn't really seem like a meaningful distinction to me since both periods of withdrawal are caused by ceasing the intake of the drug
The logic being that meth users die of other conditions caused by using meth like heart failure stroke and rhabdomyolysis, whereas opioid overdose deaths are caused directly by the drugs effect on respiratory failure. How does this make any kind of sense? If a new user takes 500mg of meth and it causes them to have a stroke or a fatal blood clot, is that not just as much caused by the meth as respiratory failure is caused by opioids?
Meth overdose death isn't even exceptionally rare, and is the second most common culprit of death from overdose in the USA. Meth kills perfectly efficiently on its own, not just when paired with other drugs in a cocktail. It kills otherwise perfectly healthy individuals, and it can kill from the very first dose a person takes not just from a dose after years of physical deterioration from long term heavy use.
It is an insanely powerful drug that surges the body with adrenaline in a fight or flight state biologically intended to last a few moments that is stretched into hours and days. Although it may be true that cocaine is more cardiotoxic than meth, methamphetamine is PLENTY brutal on the cardiovascular system as coke and need not be softened by a comparison of a drug that is somehow even worse on the heart. Prescription doses of amphetanine are typically within the 20-40mg range but recreational methamphetamine users are no strangers to taking the equivalent of a months worth of Adderall in a single day or even a single shot.
Where did this notion come from? Why is it so persistent? Overdose deaths from meth use are skyrocketing as purity, availability and affordability continue to increase globally. The more pure the meth becomes, the more dangerous to the body and mind it too becomes.
And meth definitely has a very unpleasant acute withdrawal period, sometimes followed by its famously bleak and lengthy PAWs depression and cognitive difficulty. Just because the cause of this withdrawal is a rebound of bodily needs rather than a physical dependency developing like GABA drugs and opioids doesn't really seem like a meaningful distinction to me since both periods of withdrawal are caused by ceasing the intake of the drug