• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Immigration discussion

No, Whites built NA. It’s more theirs than any other race, by conquest, civilisation, & sheer numbers until recently.
railroad2.jpg


this guy would like a word

Whites did not built North America. That's completely ahistorical.

Now give me one good reason why I should care about the fact that I, a white person, am both native American and also Persian ancestry. What culturally shared beliefs do I have with thes people? I refuse to live with these people, because that has not been the life I have lived. Will you now oppress me to get me into one of those communities?
 
In Canada? sure...

The US? Take a history lesson.

There are over 150 million non white naturalized immigrants in the US. Over 3x the entire Canadian population.
Yeah, fix the infrastructure. To many narrow roadways, bridges that are too old and get rid of the Urban blight. About 98% of Detroit is a fixer upper, and I am being kind. Besides Canada cannot support the type of living we have in the US, (accept Alaska, what is their population density)
 
railroad2.jpg


this guy would like a word
What is that, just kidding, I think they used the same argument against the the Chinese railroad laborers smoking opium as they did black railroad workers and cocaine. It makes them rape white women. No it don't, I never had an opiod make me horney or care to find out what coke does. It can't be good, I seen one too many crackheads over the years and they were a mess.
 
No, Whites built NA. It’s more theirs than any other race, by conquest, civilisation, & sheer numbers until recently.
I wonder if we South Italian are whites in your opinion ( back then we were not or not enough in the US) cos we kinda played a part as well
 
I thought northern Italians don't see southern Italians as white. I don't remember where I read that
 
I thought northern Italians don't see southern Italians as white. I don't remember where I read that
Yep, slightly less now because of internal migration ( lots of people from the South moved and still move to the North to work) but yeah, they used to call us Africans or "terroni " ( like "land peasants " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrone).

Cesare Lombroso, the father of modern criminology, had a theory according to which many of us were "natural born criminals " also because of our African and Arab ancestry ( very offensive, I m cool with the natural born criminal thing but I m no Arab! just kidding in case you are wondering)

Btw one of my best friends back home is almost 2 meters tall blonde with blue eyes ( yep, even I had kinda a crush on him, imagine the ladies :ROFLMAO: ) while another friend of mine from Calabria looks basically like an Arab ( he did his PhD with me in the UK and the security at Heathrow and Stansted were very fond of him ) so again, this race thing is BOLLOCKS
 
Last edited:
Yep, slightly less now because of internal migration ( lots of people from the South moved and still move to the North to work) but yeah, they used to call us Africans or "terroni " ( like "land peasants " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrone).

Cesare Lombroso, the father of modern criminology, had a theory according to which many of us were "natural born criminals " also because of our African and Arab ancestry ( very offensive, I m cool with the natural born criminal thing but I m no Arab! just kidding in case you are wondering)

Btw one of my best friends back home is almost 2 meters tall blonde with blue eyes ( yep, even I had kinda a crush on him, imagine the ladies :ROFLMAO: ) while another friend of mine from Calabria looks basically like an Arab ( he did his PhD with me in the UK and the security at Heathrow and Stansted were very fond of him ) so again, this race thing is BOLLOCKS
Not bollocks, but people following their natural preference to breed racially.

I haven’t been to S Italy but there are very white people there and ones with lots of admixture, as you’ve observed yourself.

Lombroso sounds like an intelligent man, unfraid to speak uncomfortable truths.
 
Lombroso sounds like an intelligent man, unfraid to speak uncomfortable truths.
Actually his "truths" were very popular in the Italian academia and in the scientific community as a whole from the second half of the 19th century up until the end of WWII. Very handy in order to give a "scientific rationale " to a number of criminal policies . Here some of his "truths":

- The unrest in the recently annexed South Italian regions? That s because South Italian are ungrateful beasts, not because life in the South went from hard to untenable (heavy taxation, military conscription, privatization of public domain land etc) .

- Should women have political rights and access to education? Nonsense, they are biologically inferior to men!
- Crime could be prevented by improving the living conditions of the lower classes? Nonsense, criminals are "born that way".

The ironic tragedy is that he was a Jew, and his "truths" were partially responsible for the anti Semitic policies of Fascism ....
 
Actually his "truths" were very popular in the Italian academia and in the scientific community as a whole from the second half of the 19th century up until the end of WWII. Very handy in order to give a "scientific rationale " to a number of criminal policies . Here some of his "truths":

- The unrest in the recently annexed South Italian regions? That s because South Italian are ungrateful beasts, not because life in the South went from hard to untenable (heavy taxation, military conscription, privatization of public domain land etc) .

- Should women have political rights and access to education? Nonsense, they are biologically inferior to men!
- Crime could be prevented by improving the living conditions of the lower classes? Nonsense, criminals are "born that way".

The ironic tragedy is that he was a Jew, and his "truths" were partially responsible for the anti Semitic policies of Fascism ....
Lmao & you think that’s ALL utter rubbish I assume? Ahhh ignorance must be bliss.
 
I was bored and read the article. It never actually explains what the 3.5 billion is going to be used for. It uses suggestive wording but doesn't actually describe anything. Lame.

80% of the article is just bitching about democrats and Obama.
 
Mass 3rd world immigration is fairly recent actually
Nah, man, migrations have been going on for ages. Mass migrations intrigue me and I sometimes wonder where it will be next time around. If it's hot surely it won't be around the equator.
Since mankinds inception migration has been a "thing". Mostly dampered by industrialism I think and agriculture.
It'll all fail and we will hit the trail soon enough maybe within the next 10 yrs idk.
For not having much to contribute to the migration phenom seems I almost wrote an essay. 😁
Best to all of us hope we can get along on that narrow path to a place where the grass is greener but history will predict otherwise.
Human... Ha!
Our own worst and only enemy.
I would love to migrate to the land down under but seems I'm in a trap spot.
I say let everyone go where they wanna go no questions....
"Wait, why?"
I'm thinking a hundred billion and I can't keep my Obama phone in the US. Damn.
 
Last edited:
immigration is good when its controlled growth. When its out of control it collapses all the systems and infrastructure which cant handle the fast growing population.

As long as they hard workers and law abiding folk i welcome them in.
 
It's a lot like the utterly doomed War On Drugs--- as long as Americans want to buy drugs, there will be drugs for sale in America.

And as long as Americans hire undocumented workers, there will be undocumented people coming here to work.
 
immigration is good when its controlled growth. When its out of control it collapses all the systems and infrastructure which cant handle the fast growing population.
Fundamentally I think this exposes why societies are a halfway house for humanity, before reaching true civilization, and why I sort of agree with the John Lennon communist-esque idea of 'imagine no countries..'.

You create a wall/national boundary, like a biological cell wall, and you immediately establish the conditions for osmosis to take place whereby pressure can increase inside the cell or in reverse cause its dissolution. It takes the overarching, superior, strategic body consciousness to navigate the environment, to ensure the cells of that body are not dehydrated or over-saturated.

In other words, it requires a superior governing or unifying motivator. One obvious path, is a global governing system, but we see the fundamental flaws in this approach already in our world, because the superior governing forces are themselves not superior and do not even understand their own humanness. There is another way, which starts from the ground up.. from the individual.

Why is it people want to immigrate in the first place? Primarily economics, or fleeing the consequences of other human beings who themselves act out of ignorance. Give people their own plot of land and the means of self-sufficiency, and both the economic and survival motivators for immigration virtually evaporate. Immigration will always be a problem so long as we try to maintain the walls, the economic model, instead of investing into what we can do to allow all humans to just live out their lives with quiet dignity.

* puts down the peace pipe *
 
Fundamentally I think this exposes why societies are a halfway house for humanity, before reaching true civilization, and why I sort of agree with the John Lennon communist-esque idea of 'imagine no countries..'.

You create a wall/national boundary, like a biological cell wall, and you immediately establish the conditions for osmosis to take place whereby pressure can increase inside the cell or in reverse cause its dissolution. It takes the overarching, superior, strategic body consciousness to navigate the environment, to ensure the cells of that body are not dehydrated or over-saturated.

In other words, it requires a superior governing or unifying motivator. One obvious path, is a global governing system, but we see the fundamental flaws in this approach already in our world, because the superior governing forces are themselves not superior and do not even understand their own humanness. There is another way, which starts from the ground up.. from the individual.

Why is it people want to immigrate in the first place? Primarily economics, or fleeing the consequences of other human beings who themselves act out of ignorance. Give people their own plot of land and the means of self-sufficiency, and both the economic and survival motivators for immigration virtually evaporate. Immigration will always be a problem so long as we try to maintain the walls, the economic model, instead of investing into what we can do to allow all humans to just live out their lives with quiet dignity.

* puts down the peace pipe *
You sound like you would enjoy Russell Brand’s ideals.
 
You sound like you would enjoy Russell Brand’s ideals.
It has been interesting seeing him evolve his perspective over the past couple of years. Unfortunately I can't stomach much of his talking a mile-a-minute ADHD style of presentation, I just don't have the patience to decompress it. Though in fairness I'm burnt out at this point, I just want the nonsense to be over tbh.
 
Top