• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Wars, Invasions, & Imperialism Thread v. Ukraine & Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those people are controlled by the media, it doesn't mean that you need to have those beliefs too. And it isn't just libs, don't forget the evangelical support of Israel. They're heavily backed by right wing religious nuts
The indoctrination is unreal “Israel is gods country” “Israel is our greatest Allie”. I always ask them to explain where they heard this, and why they believe it. It’s ironic that the only mainstream population of people with sense about them are the same people that think a tumor is the same thing as a human fetus.
 
Trying to convince the hard core lefties, with the facts never works. But his communist political beliefs and support for Fidel Castro, Yasser Arafat, and giving the countries highest award to a foreigner to Gaddafi, and Suharto is awful, I know nothing about the Nigerian coup guy. But to the left he will have his legacy as a great man forever in their minds despite his support of evil leaders and violence.
The knee jerk reaction to any criticism will be met with absolute fury. No matter the truth.
 
Last edited:
Trying to convince the hard core lefties, with the facts never works. But his communist political beliefs and support for Fidel Castro, Yasser Arafat, and giving the countries highest award to a foreigner to Gaddafi, and Suharto is awful, I know nothing about the Nigerian coup guy. But I can't seem to get back to the article, maybe it's my phone or someone preventing the facts from getting out?

Coming right up!

by Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun

Code:
MUCH of the sanctimonious grieving for Nelson Mandela is not just a sin against history - but a danger.

It is true Mandela rose to greatness. Freed after 27 years in a South African jail, the anti-apartheid fighter emerged not bent on vengeance but healing.

He negotiated a peaceful end to apartheid, and as the first president of democratic South Africa, preached - and practised - reconciliation. In this he was great. A healer. An inspiration.

For many whites abroad, he seems even Christ-like - someone who'd suffered for the sins of white guilt, and absolved those who believed in him of the sin of racism.

But Mandela was no Christ nor even Gandhi nor Martin Luther King. He was for decades a man of violence. In 1961, he broke with African National Congress colleagues who preached non-violence, creating a terrorist wing.

He later pleaded guilty in court to acts of public violence, and behind bars sanctioned more, including the 1983 Church St car bomb that killed 19 people.

Mandela even suggested cutting off the noses of blacks deemed collaborators. His then wife Winnie advocated "necklacing" instead - a burning tyre around the neck.

Mandela argued the apartheid regime left him no option but to fight violence with violence, but it is too easy to claim events proved him right. His legacy is not yet played out.

Current president Jacob Zuma until recently still publicly sang the anti-apartheid song, Shoot the Boer, in a still-divided country where many white farmers have been shot.

Mandela's support for other leaders of violence is even less forgivable. He maintained close ties to Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and backed Palestinian terrorist leader Yasser Arafat. As president in 1997, he gave his country's highest award for a foreigner to Libya's dictator, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who'd donated $10 million to the ANC. He gave the same award to the corrupt Indonesian president Suharto, who he said had donated $60 million.

He supported Nigerian coup leader Sani Abacha, refusing to say a word publicly to stop the 1995 hanging of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa.

I repeat, Mandela did great things. But many of his more radical supporters in the West now use that greatness to wash clean his record of political violence - and his support for dictators who'd used it.

That is dangerous.

The article fails to mention that Mandela's arrest was for association with groups that employed car bombs to terrorize their opponents. Nobody is quite sure if Mandela himself was planting bombs or merely involved with organizing.
 
Coming right up!

by Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun

Code:
MUCH of the sanctimonious grieving for Nelson Mandela is not just a sin against history - but a danger.

It is true Mandela rose to greatness. Freed after 27 years in a South African jail, the anti-apartheid fighter emerged not bent on vengeance but healing.

He negotiated a peaceful end to apartheid, and as the first president of democratic South Africa, preached - and practised - reconciliation. In this he was great. A healer. An inspiration.

For many whites abroad, he seems even Christ-like - someone who'd suffered for the sins of white guilt, and absolved those who believed in him of the sin of racism.

But Mandela was no Christ nor even Gandhi nor Martin Luther King. He was for decades a man of violence. In 1961, he broke with African National Congress colleagues who preached non-violence, creating a terrorist wing.

He later pleaded guilty in court to acts of public violence, and behind bars sanctioned more, including the 1983 Church St car bomb that killed 19 people.

Mandela even suggested cutting off the noses of blacks deemed collaborators. His then wife Winnie advocated "necklacing" instead - a burning tyre around the neck.

Mandela argued the apartheid regime left him no option but to fight violence with violence, but it is too easy to claim events proved him right. His legacy is not yet played out.

Current president Jacob Zuma until recently still publicly sang the anti-apartheid song, Shoot the Boer, in a still-divided country where many white farmers have been shot.

Mandela's support for other leaders of violence is even less forgivable. He maintained close ties to Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and backed Palestinian terrorist leader Yasser Arafat. As president in 1997, he gave his country's highest award for a foreigner to Libya's dictator, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who'd donated $10 million to the ANC. He gave the same award to the corrupt Indonesian president Suharto, who he said had donated $60 million.

He supported Nigerian coup leader Sani Abacha, refusing to say a word publicly to stop the 1995 hanging of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa.

I repeat, Mandela did great things. But many of his more radical supporters in the West now use that greatness to wash clean his record of political violence - and his support for dictators who'd used it.

That is dangerous.

The article fails to mention that Mandela's arrest was for association with groups that employed car bombs to terrorize their opponents. Nobody is quite sure if Mandela himself was planting bombs or merely involved with organizing.
Those white farmers all should have salted the soil and left
 
Coming right up!

by Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun

Code:
MUCH of the sanctimonious grieving for Nelson Mandela is not just a sin against history - but a danger.

It is true Mandela rose to greatness. Freed after 27 years in a South African jail, the anti-apartheid fighter emerged not bent on vengeance but healing.

He negotiated a peaceful end to apartheid, and as the first president of democratic South Africa, preached - and practised - reconciliation. In this he was great. A healer. An inspiration.

For many whites abroad, he seems even Christ-like - someone who'd suffered for the sins of white guilt, and absolved those who believed in him of the sin of racism.

But Mandela was no Christ nor even Gandhi nor Martin Luther King. He was for decades a man of violence. In 1961, he broke with African National Congress colleagues who preached non-violence, creating a terrorist wing.

He later pleaded guilty in court to acts of public violence, and behind bars sanctioned more, including the 1983 Church St car bomb that killed 19 people.

Mandela even suggested cutting off the noses of blacks deemed collaborators. His then wife Winnie advocated "necklacing" instead - a burning tyre around the neck.

Mandela argued the apartheid regime left him no option but to fight violence with violence, but it is too easy to claim events proved him right. His legacy is not yet played out.

Current president Jacob Zuma until recently still publicly sang the anti-apartheid song, Shoot the Boer, in a still-divided country where many white farmers have been shot.

Mandela's support for other leaders of violence is even less forgivable. He maintained close ties to Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and backed Palestinian terrorist leader Yasser Arafat. As president in 1997, he gave his country's highest award for a foreigner to Libya's dictator, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who'd donated $10 million to the ANC. He gave the same award to the corrupt Indonesian president Suharto, who he said had donated $60 million.

He supported Nigerian coup leader Sani Abacha, refusing to say a word publicly to stop the 1995 hanging of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa.

I repeat, Mandela did great things. But many of his more radical supporters in the West now use that greatness to wash clean his record of political violence - and his support for dictators who'd used it.

That is dangerous.

The article fails to mention that Mandela's arrest was for association with groups that employed car bombs to terrorize their opponents. Nobody is quite sure if Mandela himself was planting bombs or merely involved with organizing.
It was my phone, but the healing has turned into reverse racism and the country relies heavily on the white farmers, and the countries policies are destroying the economy.
Instead of healing and reconciliation, reverse racism is now in full affect and the country is going to destroy itself.
 
It was my phone, but the healing has turned into reverse racism and the country relies heavily on the white farmers, and the countries policies are destroying the economy.
Instead of healing and reconciliation, reverse racism is now in full affect and the country is going to destroy itself.
if things swing far to far in an extreme direction, they often seem to have to swing far too far in the opposite extreme direction before (hopefully) returning to some less extreme position
 
Those white farmers all should have salted the soil and left
Zimbabwe in 2020 asked the white farmers that were chased away to come back. President/ dictator Mugabe gave the land to his cronies who knew nothing of farming. They have tried to compensate the white farmers and agriculture is getting better in the impoverished nation. Chasing off white farmers will hurt South Africa just like Zimbabwe. These people know the land and for generations have been the agricultural backbone of South Africa. With high HIV rates and a poor economy, destroying the agriculture by scaring off the white farmers will be a disaster, just like Zimbabwe learned. Even Mugabe, learned and regretted this before his ouster from power and death. Like it not these people have for generations been a key part of South Africa's economy and provided agricultural products and are an important part of South Africa and it's economy.
As far as salting the earth, wow that would destroy a lot of South Africa, and I fear for all those especially the children who would suffer. But that would reek havoc and the government would be mostly to blame, imo.
We live in an imperfect world and sometimes people need to accept reality, and salting the farmlands would be a hugh and horrible dose of that. Let's hope and pray that it doesn't get that bad and some measure of reason and reality prevails for all the people of South Africa.
 
GXspX7zXwAAbQaU
 
NATO headquarters, Belgium, vs the Nazi SS. Funny that out of all the possible building architectural styles and possible configurations they'd just happen to settle on one that looks suspiciously like the Nazi SS insignia. Just like the coincidental choice of the NATO logo itself having an embedded swastika in its design.

800px-Brussels_NATO_Headquarters_02.jpg
ss_logo2112223155541971162.png
 
Wake up people the only reason Ukraine is being attacked by NATO is because the globalist went to Putin an asked to implement there globalist ideology in Russia i.e. cutting boys an girls private parts like what's happening in America. Putin told the globalist elites to take a hike an this so why the globalist are trying to punish Russia using The terrorist force Nato
Could you cite a source that isn't Alex Jones that Ukraine is under attack by NATO? Or for that matter anything you're saying?
 
Any thoughts on the microchip angle, in that the Donbas region of Ukraine is the global hub for high-grade neon used in the manufacturing of microchips. See: Ukraine, Neon, and Semiconductors - U.S. International Trade Commission

"Neon gas is a critical input for the semiconductor industry due to its use in lasers. One of the largest sources of neon is the steel industry, where it is a byproduct of liquid oxygen generation. As of 2022, Ukraine supplies an estimated 50 percent of neon worldwide, which is largely attributable to the legacy of the Soviet steel industry. The U.S. semiconductor industry is dependent on this portion of the global value chain, as Ukraine produces nearly all of the ultra-high-purity semiconductor-grade neon imported by the United States. This executive briefing explains neon capture, its chief downstream application (i.e., lasers), and Ukraine’s importance in the neon supply chain."
 
NATO headquarters, Belgium, vs the Nazi SS. Funny that out of all the possible building architectural styles and possible configurations they'd just happen to settle on one that looks suspiciously like the Nazi SS insignia. Just like the coincidental choice of the NATO logo itself having an embedded swastika in its design.

800px-Brussels_NATO_Headquarters_02.jpg
ss_logo2112223155541971162.png


you mean like your name?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top