• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Israel is under attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
I did answer you

No you did not.

You said that we basically created Hamas because the Palestinians have been so mistreated.

I named other mistreated groups, who have faced far more devastation than them. Then I asked you why they didn't respond by forming terror groups or inflicting wide scale violence upon others.

You didn't answer and neither have the other people before you who I've had this exact same conversation with.
 
So why does your empathy and compassion only extend in one direction? 1000+ innocent Israeli's were butchered. What was their crime, other than being born in the wrong area of Israel? And how do you square the circle in regards to justifying the butchery of these people?

Don't forget Hamas won 44% of the vote. That's a lot of Gazan's who willingly voted these people in, knowing full well what they actually stand for. That doesn't justify bombing civilians out of existence, but conversely it means painting all the people of Gaza as innocent is a ludicrous notion.

Also, why isn't the UN demanding the immediate release of all Hamas hostages? And their immediate surrender? That would be the quickest way to end this conflict.

Why isn't THAT the narrative being spread through the media?
 
So why does your empathy and compassion only extend in one direction? 1000+ innocent Israeli's were butchered. What was their crime, other than being born in the wrong area of Israel? And how do you square the circle in regards to justifying the butchery of these people?

Don't forget Hamas won 44% of the vote. That's a lot of Gazan's who willingly voted these people in, knowing full well what they actually stand for. That doesn't justify bombing civilians out of existence, but conversely it means painting all the people of Gaza as innocent is a ludicrous notion.

The last time an election was held in Gaza was a pretty long time ago, though. I haven’t done much reading on the election you’re referencing but, from what I understand, Hamas succeeded because they primarily ran against the corruption of Fatah etc, not because they advanced any real policy agenda that the Palestinians signed unto and definitely not be putting their own extremism front-and-center
 
The UN is asking for the release of hostages and end to hostilities, last time I checked.

I have sympathy for anyone who has died, regardless of which side, but killing 1000 people doesn't mean I then go and kill 15,000 (and counting) in return.

How about they simply reinforce their border and enter into peaceful dialogue to try and solve the problem? Then, maybe one day, they won't even need a border anymore.

There's a peaceful solution.

What you're saying is, essentially, fuck that, kill em' all. Innocents get in the way? Screw em!

I've given you a peaceful endgame where nobody dies. Now, if you could just tell me your better alternative?

Murder is murder, doesn't matter which flag you're flying or god you're praying to. It's still murder. The only thing people are seeing on the news is that number going up and up. Two weeks ago 5000, last week 10,000, this week 15,000. That's all we're seeing, And as much as governments would want you think that people are stupid, sadly for the nut-jobs running the Israeli war machine, they're not blind.
 
Last edited:
So why does your empathy and compassion only extend in one direction? 1000+ innocent Israeli's were butchered. What was their crime, other than being born in the wrong area of Israel? And how do you square the circle in regards to justifying the butchery of these people?

Don't forget Hamas won 44% of the vote. That's a lot of Gazan's who willingly voted these people in, knowing full well what they actually stand for. That doesn't justify bombing civilians out of existence, but conversely it means painting all the people of Gaza as innocent is a ludicrous notion.
Hamas won 44% of the vote in 2005 when over 50% of the current population hadn't been born yet. Or are they just guilty by association? The level of deflection is absurd

Hamas also represented themselves as more moderate back then, on top of many people voting for Hamas because they were the least corrupt option at the time

Apparently the 12,000+ Palestinians are worth less than 1400 Israelis to you but I'm not surprised considering people in this thread just seem to hate Muslims in general. Its obvious from all the whataboutisms. Classic racist shit
 
How about they simply reinforce their border and enter into peaceful dialogue to try and solve the problem? Then, maybe one day, they won't even need a border anymore.
Dude come on, don't be so naïve. The history shows quite clearly that the Arab world is simply not interested in an amicable solution - why do you put the ball in Israel's court given this historical context? Hamas could have requested to enter into a peaceful dialogue, but instead they decided to raid and butcher innocent civilians. As a neutral observer to all this I think it's ridiculous to assume that Israel should be the one trying to curate a dialogue of peace talks, again.

If they reinforced the border - and once the laser air defence dome goes online - the number of rocket attacks would decrease substantially and they'll just go back to good old public space bombings and stabbings.

Peaceful dialogue is only possible if both sides actually want to find peace. The problem with the Arab world broadly is they do not like Jews, and they do not like the fact of Israel's success either. It is all an affront to their ego. And you can bet that if oil is ever superseded as an energy source that Saudi Arabia and the other oil rich states will default into this same mental condition of projecting all their hatred and frustration towards the Jews/Israel as well.
 
I already have, the problem is that you don't like the answer I've given you.

"The history shows quite clearly that the Arab world is simply not interested in an amicable solution "

Again, just read that book I recommended. At various times over the last 100 years it's not that the Arabs aren't interested in an amicable solution - the problem is that the Israelis also don't want an amicable solution. It isn't one side is saying no, the other is saying yes. Many times peace plans were suggested and each and every time if it wasn't one, it was the other who rejected it. Historically, they're about an even split.

The problem is that the founding of Israel should never have gone ahead in the first place - and history has repeatedly proven this.

I'll remind you that most Jews in the USA (you know, the smart, educated ones) were dead against the idea from the start. 100 years ago they foresaw the mess that is unravelling today. And it wasn't just them. If they were so ignorant - can you explain to me how they seemed to get it so right?

There was no Jewish population there for hundreds of years, perhaps thousands in significant numbers.

It's like me going to the middle of the Nevada desert and saying "it's mine, because this old book says it should be mine." I don't think I'd be getting any titles or deeds to any land any time soon. The fact that it's mostly empty also doesn't entitle me to any god given right to this land either. So Israel did get it's impossible "homeland" - great. But the deal was always that they were never a majority and that any ruling council must be greater in numbers on the Arab side. Israel ignored these conditions from day 1 - and that's why the Arabs aren't very happy and have little (or no) trust in the Western powers that were supposed to protect their side of the deal. It's this complete and utter breakdown of trust, exacerbated by Israels actions, that have caused this mess.
 
Last edited:
The last time an election was held in Gaza was a pretty long time ago, though. I haven’t done much reading on the election you’re referencing but, from what I understand, Hamas succeeded because they primarily ran against the corruption of Fatah etc, not because they advanced any real policy agenda that the Palestinians signed unto and definitely not be putting their own extremism front-and-center
Recent polls (last year) show 34% approval for Hamas. And even more recent polls show an increase.


The UN is asking for the release of hostages and end to hostilities, last time I checked.

Correct. But the UN also rejected a resolution condemning the Octorber 7th attacks. The UN is, as with so many big political bodies these days, appallingly compromised.


How about they simply reinforce their border and enter into peaceful dialogue to try and solve the problem?
That is precisely what Israel have tried time and time again. Israel left Gaza in 2005, including evicting Jewish settlers. They built a billion dollar wall on their border. Since that point, they have been under constant rocket attack from the area. How do you have peaceful dialogue with people who literally want your people completely eradicated? This is just extremely naive.

At several points, Israel has tried to compromise and support a creation of a Palestinian state. Yasser Arafat rejected what would have been a genuine Palestinian state with 97% of the territory Palestinian officials had been calling for. At the very least, the leaders of the Palestinians have absolutely never wanted peace with Israel.
 
Again, just read that book I recommended.
I've got more important books to read at the moment which are relevant to my life.
The problem is that the founding of Israel should never have gone ahead in the first place - and history has repeatedly proven this.
It shouldn't have happened in the way it happened, and I believe the global ruling elite are playing geopolitical games at everyone's expense. Granted. But we are where we are now, we can't roll back the clock, Israel isn't going anywhere and it's pointless to cling on to this as a point to use in debate on the subject. The Arab side clings to it and makes it a foundation of their position, hoping to play the emotional card on outsiders, but the fact of the matter is they rejected the initial two-state solution and then started a war against Israel, and lost. From that point they lost all legitimate claim to using that argument at all.
There was no Jewish population there for hundreds of years, perhaps thousands in significant numbers.
There have always been Jews in the region. Numbers is not a stake/argument either. The fact of the matter is the land was under Ottoman control, then passed to British control, because war. This is the history of the world, and again we are where we are. If it hadn't been the Ottoman's or British, it would have been somebody else.

Listen, I'm neutral on this. I'm certainly no fan of the ruling elite either as anyone on this forum will attest. But I think you (and others) give far too much credence to the Arab world. They may very well be being played by Western powers - the British have been meddling in the region for 100+ years e.g. see Saudi Arabia history. But on the flip side of this the Arabs generally speaking have nothing besides oil. They are trying to play one of the only cards they have available, which is religious anger and fervour in combination with garnering sympathy (poorly) from the rest of the world.

It is comparable to the indignation that many black people feel today towards the West and white people generally, white people who have absolutely no connection to the slavery and in their own way were just as much as slaves to the Anglo-American enterprise i.e. see British history on land enclosures, industrial revolution, etc. The point is that neither the Arabs or black people have to fall into this trap of expressing anger towards a group of people who haven't actually done anything to them. The 1000+ Israeli's had done nothing. Just like the average British or American person has done nothing.

The irony is the Arabs (and black people) actually hold tremendous power. If they would only stop falling into the devils trap, so to speak, and refuse to play that game then the violence would evaporate. In the current context Hamas didn't have to attack innocent civilians, and as soon as they did they just fell straight into the trap again and invited more retribution from the Israeli state. I don't have much sympathy because there's too many people under the spell of the lslamic faith who aren't challenging their own authority figures and arguing for a position of peace, and instead just default into the easy trap of hatred towards Israel (and Jews generally). It has to be resisted at that ground level. Likewise this is why I have little sympathy for the black community who fall into the offered garbage culture of 'drill' etc that encourages violent impulses, or playing up to the indignation of crimes committed to their ancestors but which they personally have zero connection to. I should also say I have no sympathy for the British and American public who on large also continue to fall for our own charades as well. We are all failing to see through a lot of shit that really we should have by now.
 
Hamas burnt children alive. This is not a thing that can be allowed to go unpunished if you value a world where kids don't get burnt alive. Israel cannot not respond if they do not want this barbarity to continue.

Fwiw, I actually increasingly think that their strategy here is less than optimal. They've played into the hands of Hamas and Iran by creating a highly public killing field of (yes) innocent people. They've been creating the exact propaganda that Hamas and Iran were angling for.

Anyway, after your comment re: 'hostage wanting Hamas dick', I think you've re-established what sort of person you are.

40 dead babies > no dead babies > 40 beheaded babies > not beheaded but decapitated by RPG babies > no dead babies > baby in the oven > no baby in the oven > dead babies!

Try find any proof of the 40 beheaded babies. There is none. Burden of proof lies on who makes the accusation.
 
40 dead babies > no dead babies > 40 beheaded babies > not beheaded but decapitated by RPG babies > no dead babies > baby in the oven > no baby in the oven > dead babies!

Try find any proof of the 40 beheaded babies. There is none. Burden of proof lies on who makes the accusation.
This has been discussed already. The initial claim was not made by the Israeli state itself but by journalists who misinterpreted what was said on the scene - babies and infants were killed, but it wasn't 40 beheadings.

On the flip side journalists also parroted the claims by the Gazan health authority (Hamas controlled) about that hospital and 500+ deaths that never actually happened, and was actually a failed Hamas rocket launch landing in the car park.
 
It shouldn't have happened in the way it happened, and I believe the global ruling elite are playing geopolitical games at everyone's expense. Granted. But we are where we are now, we can't roll back the clock, Israel isn't going anywhere and it's pointless to cling on to this as a point to use in debate on the subject. The Arab side clings to it and makes it a foundation of their position, hoping to play the emotional card on outsiders, but the fact of the matter is they rejected the initial two-state solution and then started a war against Israel, and lost. From that point they lost all legitimate claim to using that argument at all.
"We are where we are now, blaa blaa" and then you proceed to argument for the situation by what happened back then? Also conveniently forgetting that the bunch of jews were not anyway called in by majority of inhabitants of that land, but imperialist forces and such.
 
"We are where we are now, blaa blaa" and then you proceed to argument for the situation by what happened back then? Also conveniently forgetting that the bunch of jews were not anyway called in by majority of inhabitants of that land, but imperialist forces and such.
Bla bla bla. So what do YOU or anyone else actually propose as a solution to this problem. It's all good pointing out that this shouldn't have happened but it has happened, we can only move forward.

You know I'd actually like to see Israel disappear, only so that we could watch the Arab world move in and then continue to make a complete hash of things and also continue to find excuses to inflict violence upon each other.
 
Bla bla bla. So what do YOU or anyone else actually propose as a solution to this problem. It's all good pointing out that this shouldn't have happened but it has happened, we can only move forward.

You know I'd actually like to see Israel disappear, only so that we could watch the Arab world move in and then continue to make a complete hash of things and also continue to find excuses to inflict violence upon each other.

The bottom part of that is very telling what your views really are. Wipe out all those dirty Arabs eh. All of Palestine would be better off taken over entirely by Israel anyway. Just kill off all the Palestinians. Pesky cunts the lot of them.

Who's really the Nazi here with an attitude like that?
 
The bottom part of that is very telling what your views really are. Wipe out all those dirty Arabs eh. All of Palestine would be better off taken over entirely by Israel anyway. Just kill off all the Palestinians. Pesky cunts the lot of them.

Who's really the Nazi here with an attitude like that?
Oh give over. I asked you (and others) what your actual proposal is for resolving the situation beyond just moaning about who has rights to the land. Seriously, what is your actual solution beyond just endlessly moaning about land rights? Two-state solution? Destruction of Israel? What?

And playing the Nazi card was weak. Suggesting that the Arab world might just self-destruct on its own is not even close Nazi thinking. Oh, and do I need to point out that the Nazi's and Hitler had more in common with Islam than I do with the Nazi ideology? I'll presume you know the history without having to derail the thread explaining that.

If you want to continually moan about land rights then you should at least have an explanation to the, very simple, question of what you think an actual solution should look like. I can tell you mine: the Arab world should drop their hatred and accept Israel isn't going anywhere, ask to have actual serious dialogue this time regarding a two state solution perhaps involving one or more of the bordering countries - they all have an abundance of land - and then they can get back to focusing on improving their lives instead of playing this never ending game of pointless violence.

So what's yours?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top