AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
I keep on saying that the vast majority of the world's nations used VVVs and not mRNA vaccines and said VVVs are available in the US.
Since the US uses a for-profit health service, it would be in the interests of the companies who make said VVVs to critique the mRNA vaccine if only to increase their own market share. But their studies didn't find anything of note. I saw that some of the US media went to great lengths to explain the different methodology but evidently the difference between mRNA and DNA are beyond some people.
If you choose not to be vaccinated then that's your choice, but the 1 nation who decided to go with ivermectin is also the nation with the highest per capita infection and death rate. Peru. A fatality rate of 4.91% of those infected. Lima does somewhat skew the figures because although a single city, was hit very hard.
Since the US uses a for-profit health service, it would be in the interests of the companies who make said VVVs to critique the mRNA vaccine if only to increase their own market share. But their studies didn't find anything of note. I saw that some of the US media went to great lengths to explain the different methodology but evidently the difference between mRNA and DNA are beyond some people.
If you choose not to be vaccinated then that's your choice, but the 1 nation who decided to go with ivermectin is also the nation with the highest per capita infection and death rate. Peru. A fatality rate of 4.91% of those infected. Lima does somewhat skew the figures because although a single city, was hit very hard.