Probably because it isn't ridiculously infectious? Can you breathe around someone with it and catch it?
Was the Vaccine Designed to kill
- Thread starter OpiateKiller
- Start date
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
The brain does metabolize one compound into another which bears a formal charge. MPTP doesn't damage the brain but MPP+ selectively kills the cells of the substantia nigra. But the fact we haven't found a single other drug that does this suggests that it's unique. People HAVE tried (iMPP+ is a research tool for Parkinson's).
The Case of the Frozen Addict : Don Wescott, WGBH (Television station : Boston, Mass.), British Broadcasting Corporation. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Describes the discovery of the link between Parkinson's disease and the destruction of brain cells by MPTP, a contaminant found in designer drugs.1...
archive.org
How about instead of relying on a blog posted based on a media release we look at the actual papers by the guy that is the PI of the research? Since nobody has tried to do that yet here you all go:
"Since the number of NPs [Nano Particles] in the brain is relatively low, this organ was not taken into consideration in the summarizing analysis."
If you look at the charts in figure 22 you can see that not only are most of the particles located in the lungs, but concentrations peaked in the organ tissue at 1 week and were under 50% on that peak by 1 month.
Do you have any idea how dynamic cells are? What makes you think that they can get tiny particles to stay in place for any reasonable amount of time? Implants stay in place just because they're too big to get broken down combined with nonreactive materials so our body doesn't attack them continuously, you know an immune response.
Biodistribution and clearance of magnetoelectric nanoparticles for nanomedical applications using energy dispersive spectroscopy
The biodistribution and clearance of magnetoelectric nanoparticles (MENs) in a mouse model was studied through electron energy dispersive spectroscopy.This approach allows for detection of nanoparticles (NPs) in tissues with the spatial resolution of ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"It was assumed that MENs could be administrated intravenously and then transported across BBB via application of a magnetic field gradient, as previously demonstrated through in vitro and in vivo studies (Guduru et al., 2015; Nair et al., 2013)."
Was anyone applying magnetic field gradients to people's heads right after being vaccinated?
Mapping the Brain’s electric fields with Magnetoelectric nanoparticles
Neurodegenerative diseases are devastating diagnoses. Examining local electric fields in response to neural activity in real time could shed light on understanding the origins of these diseases. To date, there has not been found a way to directly map ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No, it is not realistic with today's knowledge and technology, as I have repeatedly stated.
As far as I can tell they haven't published or done anything on this project since 2018
Last edited:
I don't know what you think decoding neural activity is supposed to be, maybe you have a different mental model than I do, but if you can read in real-time the activity of the entire neural network then that's really all you need as the starting point. Feeding that data through a sophisticated enough computer system, using AI and machine learning, it would only be a matter of time before they figure out patterns based on what the subject is engaged in. You could perhaps analyse the data from people who are all engaged in watching the same TV show for example, how they respond to particular imagery, and compare it.
I'm just throwing out possibilities. I know you don't think something like this is possible according to where we are publicly in the academic world, I get that - obviously if it were possible we'd already be hearing about it. But militarily, in projects that are off our radar.. come on man, everyone knows they are at least two decades ahead of the public research on any given technology.
This is why I said it was a possibility, for me, in whether to take the jab or not. I did say I don't know. I wouldn't stake money on it, but conversely I wouldn't put it past them to actually try something as fucked up like that either given you have the WEF and other ideologically driven establishment types openly talking about transhumanism. Whether they are just bragging about nothing is irrelevant to me, these people have money and power, I'm taking their words at face value quite frankly given the horrors we've witnessed in the 20th century (that were caused by exactly these types of people).
Maybe there is nothing in it. Maybe there is no cancer causing genetic segments, sterility causing segments or adjuvants, maybe the entire concoction is just fucking saline or the product they developed doesn't actually do anything at all and they just blagged it purely for profit. I don't know. But I'm sure as hell not going to gamble my health on it.
You're not throwing out possibilities because to be a possibility it needs to be one thing: possible.
See my above post on the actual research papers
See my above post on the actual research papers
But this is your problem, you're only seeing something as a valid possibility once it has already become a reality. You're assuming things aren't being done out of sight, I've made this point several times now and you won't even acknowledge that is a possibility.
The trajectory of science and technology over the past century or so has been impossibility after impossibility being made reality. Things we have now were considered pure science fiction not so long ago, magic even. I see no logical basis for clinging on to a particular narrow academic model of reality when history clearly demonstrates that we're able to make impossible things happen. And now that we have entered the era of absolutely insane computing power, which the military industrial complex has an abundance of, that only compounds the point.
Again, we're talking in the context of something being injected in haste into the worlds population for something that is no real danger at all. I'm not gambling on the idea that they haven't tried to weaponize some nanotechnological neural interface idea. I'm not going around telling people not to get jabbed because of this, it is purely my own personal rationale - there are many solid reasons not to get the jab, ones which I would/did say to people at the time.
Did you not read my post on the actual published research? Maybe you should be reading some of those papers to make judgements about science and technology rather than blog posts made from a game of telephone.
Instead of just going around dreaming that something might be possible how about reading the actual logistics of the situation, how about learning how things actually work
Instead of just going around dreaming that something might be possible how about reading the actual logistics of the situation, how about learning how things actually work
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
7 vaccines being used around the world. 6 are VVVs. But mRNA has been around since the 80s... so hardly new or untested.
Electrum1
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 29,150
Here's an article from today about that study I posted here that got you to imply I'm too stupid to understand the meaning of words, figured maybe you'd want to read it
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Reduce Immune Response To Other Infections, Potential Concern Of Immune Deficiency
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Reduce Immune Response To Other Infections, Potential Concern Of Immune Deficiency | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
AlsoTapered
Bluelighter
“Any suggestion that our exploratory study implies that COVID-19 vaccines cause a harmful suppression of children’s immune system is a naïve and misguided oversimplification of our findings, and ignores other studies that do not support this concept.” - Quote by author of study Dr Andrés Noé
www.mcri.edu.au
naïve (/nʌɪˈiːv,nɑːˈiːv/) adjective - a person showing a lack of experience, wisdom, or judgement
misguided (/mɪsˈɡʌɪdɪd/) adjective having or showing faulty judgement or reasoning
oversimplification (/ˌəʊvəˌsɪmplɪfɪˈkeɪʃn/ noun simplification of something to such an extent that a distorted impression is given
A statement regarding a recent COVID-19 vaccination publication - Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Murdoch Children’s Research Institute has released a statement from the authors of the recent publication, “BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in children alters cytokine responses to heterologous pathogens and Toll-like receptor agonists”. Read more.
www.mcri.edu.au
naïve (/nʌɪˈiːv,nɑːˈiːv/) adjective - a person showing a lack of experience, wisdom, or judgement
misguided (/mɪsˈɡʌɪdɪd/) adjective having or showing faulty judgement or reasoning
oversimplification (/ˌəʊvəˌsɪmplɪfɪˈkeɪʃn/ noun simplification of something to such an extent that a distorted impression is given
Last edited:
DeathIndustrial88
Bluelighter
When I go to get retested, I have to take a breath test to see if I still have it.
So while respiratory spread may not be as prominent, I don't think it's impossible.
Besides, there's many other "ridiculously infectious" diseases that they aren't handing out free joints & lotteries as incentives for you to get vaccinated against.
Funny, if covid is so "ridiculously infectious" then why haven't I caught it yet? I'm a chain smoking junkie who forgets to wash his hands before he eats most of the time & I was fine the entire "pandemic".
Ironically everyone I know who got "vaccinated against" it, ended up catching it severely. Just having to say this sentence out loud feels very 1984 & ridiculous, considering the irony will be lost on so many people.
Droppersneck
Bluelighter
Before it comes to that you should flee your country. Head down south, make sure it’s a unsubverted state. If you do go down, have a plan to take as many fascists as possible with ya
Droppersneck
Bluelighter
Boy, 14, Dies Suddenly After Viral 'One Chip Challenge,' Family Says
A 14-year-old boy in Massachusetts suddenly died after his family says he ate an extremely spicy chip as part of the viral "One Chip Challenge" dare.
www.insideedition.com
Nurse Ratched
Bluelight Crew
For some reason YT put this in my recommended watch list so I clicked on it. It wasn't about the above guy but there were like hundreds of these one chip challenge videos. It looks like a black Dorrito and is covered in ghost pepper powder. The ghost pepper being the hottest pepper known to man. Most videos were like I predicted. They sweat, then dance around the room, then some vomit, while others just lay there rolled up into a ball. It's not so much what happens in the mouth but what happens once it's in the digestive tract. Others have been hospitalized and YT obviously won't show ones where others have died.Boy, 14, Dies Suddenly After Viral 'One Chip Challenge,' Family Says
A 14-year-old boy in Massachusetts suddenly died after his family says he ate an extremely spicy chip as part of the viral "One Chip Challenge" dare.
What really pissed me off and I had to stop watching is they gave addicts and some homeless people $20 if they would eat the chip. They didn't tell them what it was and the results were cruel and not pretty to watch. It was just plain mean spirited and the crowd is all laughing and shit. Humanity at its finest.
AutoTripper
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 10,196
Now HOW was I intuitively calculatively so completely sure I would some guy in here lol. We needed a fresh knows-it-all Covid jab & science expert.
AutoTripper
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 10,196
I'm with you, FWIW. And they can call it insanity.
AI is luring US as artificially as a spinner does a bass.
And that bait seems destined for goblet on multiple levels. Can't disgorge that stuff.
The footage I've seen of a wide array of scientists and medical people analyzing the COVID vaccine under a microscope, and illustrating that there seems to be some kind of self-assembling nano tube network occurring, freaks me the fuck out. The videos may be completely bunk and made up nonsense, but there have been enough of them by semi credible people that I agree the nanotech human interfaces are a possibility.
Technology is advancing at breakneck pace, even the technology the general public is aware of. The corporate-military industrial complex has vast resources and top secret level stuff. The stuff that was declassified from over 50 years ago was already scary. I have no doubt that their capabilities are way more high level now, and I would not put anything past them.
The nanotechnology that is available to be read about in peer reviewed engineering and biotech research is already fairly advanced now. I mean, they are talking about putting nanotech inside of each and every pharmaceutical pill that people take to monitor whether or not they are taking their medications properly. That means the nanotech can transmit information and can detect interactions between the drug and the person's body. It's not that big of a leap to imagine neurological interactions.
Every single new technology that the biotech industry touts as beneficial for humanity, you just know that there is a way more advanced version 20 to 30 years ahead that is capable of crazy stuff that we don't know about.
I would not put anything past these people. They want to control everyone and everything. Being psycho, they are not capable of higher spiritual consciousness. They think the material world is all there is. So they are hell bent on controlling it and dominating it. It doesn't even take that much of an imagination to envision what is possible when the foundation for what they want to do is already a known reality.
Yea it sounds like bullshit, don't believe everything on the internet? You can read the published papers it's that easy
Droppersneck
Bluelighter
It’s certainly not that easy, but I do understand vaxxies not wanting to know the extent to which they fucked up.
