If you had read the details on how it works and what it might be able to do you would realize that it isn't that big of a step over what we already have. We already have noninvasive methods to control computers using EEG signals but we still don't understand what any of the signals really mean besides some of them at the motor cortex and and the auditory and visual processing areas. That's what prosthetics like cochlear implants and the mind controlled prosthetic arms are based on.
So now that I've demonstrated that my possibility of a neural interface via injectable chemicals isn't actually 'lightyears' away, you immediately flip-flop and just act like it's no big deal and try to swing the discussion to another area you consider to be an impossibility. You are unbelievable.
It's just an invasive version and here you are somehow thinking that means they understand the brain in it's entirety and can even do input into the brain? LOL
An undetectable (by a subject) nanoparticulate solution that can be injected or ingested is really stretching the definition of invasive.
You really do lack imagination don't you. They don't need to understand every little detail of the brain or on a person-to-person basis either. All they need is to be able to read in real-time neuron activity (done), put that data through a sophisticated enough computer system that can analyse that data in conjunction with other data already known about the subject, have the computer look for repeating patterns in neural activity perhaps in conjunction with other real-time data (watching screens that show certain imagery), and build up a map. That data can then be combined with data on other subjects and mined for patterns.
Do you honestly think given the insane amount of computing hardware possessed by the NSA/GCHQ and their corporate drones like Google, Amazon, etc, that they couldn't possibly pull something like that off? If they can tailor your search results on google/youtube to the point where it already feels like it is reading you mind, just by processing your digital fingerprint, then it's not a massive leap to see how these same hardware/software architectures could be used to look for patterns in neural data.
You don't need to be able to do mind control to the extent making a person hallucinate a highly specific scene, solve a Rubix cube in under 60 seconds, or have really complex behaviours/thoughts on demand. If you can figure out how to elicit emotional states in the target you can drive behaviour like Pavlov's dog, which I would argue is what they would be looking to do because it is more subtle than having random thoughts and commands pop into your mind.
Someone needs to push back on the nonsense or it becomes an echo chamber and bullshit ideas get reinforced and spread. This includes pointing out delusions of persecution
Some of those concerns are so far outside the realm of being realistic that it needs to be discussed. They're conspiracy theories which are actually used to control the populace and keep them fearing the boogyman rather than some mythical nano particle that controls your thoughts. The people giving into and spreading conspiracy theories are the ones who are actually being controlled
Why do you personally feel the need to push back on what I originally, and clearly, stated was
just a possibility that informed my decision not to have the vaccine? What does it matter to you? I'm not going around scaring people, chopping down 5G towers, or even really discussing these sorts of matters except with those who are already on the same wavelength. On my list of
possibilities regarding the vaccine the mind-control one is behind several others in terms of importance and plausibility even, it's not at the top.
Nowhere has anything close to resembling 'delusions of persecutions' been written. If you think having concerns about the establishment/military being willing to persecute populations is paranoid, that's short-sightedness and ignorance on your behalf really - do you want me to get out a history book for you and walk you through my thought process on that one?
Just because David Icke etc came out swinging with his wild ideas doesn't mean just entertaining a possibility is automatically a raging conspiracy theory or that I'm being controlled. It doesn't consume my personality, I don't go around testing graves for Bluetooth connections like some Icke follower actually told me they did. It is possible to reach certain thoughts independently you know?
