• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Was the Vaccine Designed to kill

To
ChemicallyEnhanced said:
My theory is that the government STARTED all the anti-vaxxer conspiracies. The fastest way to kill a huge number of people IS anti-vaxxers. The following vaccine-avoidable diseases are now returning (as in there are current, active outbreaks happening in 2022) 100% due to anti-vaxxers:
Measles
Mumps
Meningococcal Disease
Whooping Cough
Scarlet Fever
Rubella
Tuberculosis
Diphtheria
Click to expand...
U shouldn't speak in such absolutes . It immediately discredits you

And you (unless you complied the data yourself ) have no idea it's 100% anti-vaxxers.
It's not possible that it's all their fault
 
-=SS=- said:
If the doctor told you this then he/she was talking out of their fucking arse. Unbelievable.

The people getting blood clots and myocarditis are the ones who have taken the vaccine. No one was presenting with those symptoms prior to the vaccination campaign. It's actually absurd the amount of symptoms and conditions that 'medical professionals' are just allowed to lump on to 'covid' without any proof what so ever.
Click to expand...
Right all this shit pops up almost immediately after vaccine rollout….some people are just not all there
 
nznity said:
Oh yeah, that's when the economy stabilizes back again and shit. The thing is when shit hits the fan soon with the worst economic DEPRESSION the world has never seen...water and food are gonna be the most precious things if we want a shot at surviving. It's even gonna be worse for u guys cause you're gonna be at the epicenter of it.
Better be stacking up with Non perishable food and AMMO lol.
Click to expand...
Yea but in the crisis the gold silver not worth shit, that’s when I’ll take it off your hands at a oz per case of water ;)
 
-=SS=- said:
If the doctor told you this then he/she was talking out of their fucking arse. Unbelievable.

The people getting blood clots and myocarditis are the ones who have taken the vaccine. No one was presenting with those symptoms prior to the vaccination campaign. It's actually absurd the amount of symptoms and conditions that 'medical professionals' are just allowed to lump on to 'covid' without any proof what so ever.
Click to expand...
Yes that is what a doctor told me. I am not really always sure who or what to believe? I have a different friend who never had COVID, who had chest pains after having a flu and it was not myocarditis but I looked it up as the flu can also cause myocarditis.

I did find this study, and it is suspicious and bureaucratic that a data analyst or statistician is the one speaking for the entire population of England, what the vaccine protects against, and what COVID does or does not do to a person during infection.

"We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection," the study's lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.

The overall risk of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle – is substantially higher immediately after being infected with COVID-19 than it is in the weeks following vaccination for the coronavirus, a large new study in England shows.

Loading…

www.ahajournals.org
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
"We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection," the study's lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.

The overall risk of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle – is substantially higher immediately after being infected with COVID-19 than it is in the weeks following vaccination for the coronavirus, a large new study in England shows.

Loading…

www.ahajournals.org
Click to expand...
The study is misleading to say the least. Pharmaceutical company propaganda would be a better word to describe it. A quick dissection:

Their group/dataset is the 42+ million people in the UK who have received 1+ vaccine doses. So you see right there off the bat there is no control group at all. The word 'unvaccinated' appears only once in the entire page, in the discussion section, and it states,
First, the risk of myocarditis is substantially higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals than the increase in risk observed after a first dose of ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine
Click to expand...
This statement is presented as fact. There is no reference/s to anything to substantiate the claim at all - the study is based wholly around vaccinated people, so making that claim without any data to back it up is misleading at the very least. It also does not make any clarification as to whether someone who has just received their first dose is still classed as unvaccinated or not. I remember seeing something about this at the time, people were pointing out that they were deliberately allowing a grace period of 21 days (from memory, might be wrong on the integer) where technically the person was still counted as unvaccinated - they also used this trick when counting covid deaths, where anyone testing positive who died within 28 days from that test counted as a covid death regardless of what actually killed them.

The study also runs on the assumption, based on the mainstream narrative, that a positive test means what they claim it means. I would argue this has not be demonstrated and is part of the fundamental fraud of the whole saga.

There's so much to untangle with these kinds of statistical analysis studies that it's virtually impossible to do so, except only to highlight the obvious flaws that they can't obscure with their mountains of figures and jargon. At least they were honest enough to put in a disclosures section so we can see where some of their loyalties are: Astrazeneca, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford University (heavily connected with the government/establishment and military intelligence apparatus).
 
-=SS=- said:
This statement is presented as fact. There is no reference/s to anything to substantiate the claim at all - the study is based wholly around vaccinated people, so making that claim without any data to back it up is misleading at the very least. It also does not make any clarification as to whether someone who has just received their first dose is still classed as unvaccinated or not. I remember seeing something about this at the time, people were pointing out that they were deliberately allowing a grace period of 21 days (from memory, might be wrong on the integer) where technically the person was still counted as unvaccinated - they also used this trick when counting covid deaths, where anyone testing positive who died within 28 days from that test counted as a covid death regardless of what actually killed them.
Click to expand...

at some point during the pandemic insanity, it leaked that the majority of funding for medical science education in canada comes from pharmaceutical companies.

this situation has parallels to this [now well known] fact about the sugar industry lobbying the demonize fats -


last i checked, you can still find some products in the supermarket marketed as low fat, even though most consumers now are wise to this scam and reaching for the full fat versions.

but for a long time, everyone believed fat was evil and low fat diet was good. doctors were telling their patients to cut the fat because that the conclusion the scientific literature supported.

how is it that everyone can acknowledge that, and yet still refuse to even consider that today's established science about the mRNA "vaccines" is just industry propaganda?
 
thujone said:
how is it that everyone can acknowledge that, and yet still refuse to even consider that today's established science about the mRNA "vaccines" is just industry propaganda?
Click to expand...
It's nuts. A billion dollar food industry, with numerous players, versus a trillion dollar industry with a very limited number of players due to the threshold of technology and capital required. The incentive for the latter to be deceitful is obviously far greater from a purely profit perspective.

I can't take the scientific world seriously after discovering Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert, was instrumental in ruining the scientific journal system. He, along with his associates in Buttersworth (journal publisher), were British intelligence (MI6). How can you take the scientific enterprise seriously when it is evidently controlled from the top like this? By people with incredible wealth and power, and who have questionable ideologies and beliefs, I mean just look at some of the shit that comes out of Charly boys mouth and his late father Philip - MI6 serves the Royals. Then you have the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, to this day, heavily connected with the pharmaceutical industry.. literal war merchants involved with health? Get the fuck out of here!

When you take all the pieces together, you'd have to be fucking crazy to take these vaccines on blind trust. But that's the issue of course, vaccination itself is one of the fundamental lynchpins that holds together our modern 20/21st century scientific paradigm. To question one vaccine opens the door to questioning them all.
 
nepalnt21 said:
why do the super duper intelligent antivaxxers always think the only ppl to listen to on this topic are pfizer, moderna, and the government?

it's almost as though they don't know what critical reading entails. who woulda thunked it?
Click to expand...
if "critical thinking" led you to get the vaccine then your critical thinking skills are Biden-level.
 
-=SS=- said:
I can't take the scientific world seriously after discovering Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert, was instrumental in ruining the scientific journal system. He, along with his associates in Buttersworth (journal publisher), were British intelligence (MI6). How can you take the scientific enterprise seriously when it is evidently controlled from the top like this? By people with incredible wealth and power, and who have questionable ideologies and beliefs, I mean just look at some of the shit that comes out of Charly boys mouth and his late father Philip - MI6 serves the Royals. Then you have the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, to this day, heavily connected with the pharmaceutical industry.. literal war merchants involved with health? Get the fuck out of here!
Click to expand...

there's a book on this stuff... something something 300...

you try and explain it to people and they're like that's silly how can a small group control the whole world? and it's like gee... have you read history? Look at how much territory Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan controlled, and that was before the telegraph even existed!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top