• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The Last Covid-19 Megathread v. Hopefully...

Can you link me a study that shows the opposite in a precise quantified manner?

The answer is no, to both. As I said before, it is impossible to quantify such things due to the scale involved. Simple logic would presume that viral particles would be transmissible on their own, or through a vector (another particle they could get 'stuck' to), but the point being it isn't a requirement to have that additional vector to adhere to.
don't try to squirm out of it, you made the claim:

"Surgical masks don't do dick".

your claim hinges on you being correct about sars cov 2 particles being spread airborne and not via respiratory droplets.
 
Show me some non-circumstantial evidence that it's directly linked to the vaccine. If you can, and I can't easily disprove it with reasonable doubt, I will give you $100.
But seriously, short of the CDC/FDA or one of the companies that make and sell the vaccine coming out and straight up admitting they are responsible for the increase of SADS and all the other shit that started popping up after the release of the vaccine, short of them just telling you the vaccine is causing a lot more problems then they lead on , what would it take for you to consider the vax is more dangerous then we’ve been told
 
your claim hinges on you being correct about sars cov 2 particles being spread airborne and not via respiratory droplets.

??

By now it's long been established COVID is an airborne virus. That was the whole point of indoor spaces being more "dangerous".
 

??

By now it's long been established COVID is an airborne virus. That was the whole point of indoor spaces being more "dangerous".
what i am talking about in direct response to @-=SS=- is the idea they're putting forth of individual viral particles.

this article you are posting is talking about viruses hitching rides on aerosols.

the article even says this:

"As a result, it didn’t emphasize early enough and clearly enough the importance of ventilation and indoor masking, key measures that can prevent airborne spread of the virus."

your comment does not strengthen SS's case, in fact the article contradicts it.
 
what i am talking about in direct response to @-=SS=- is the idea they're putting forth of individual viral particles.

this article you are posting is talking about viruses hitching rides on aerosols.

the article even says this:

"As a result, it didn’t emphasize early enough and clearly enough the importance of ventilation and indoor masking, key measures that can prevent airborne spread of the virus."

your comment does not strengthen SS's case, in fact the article contradicts it.
Ah yes, makes sense now, I didn't go all the way back...
 
No your right, it’s just a coincidence….denial

you've recently criticized people for not supporting their claims with adequate sources.

and yet you seem to be doing exactly that here.

you're aware of an increase in sports deaths. you can present no evidence that covid vaccines are the cause of this increase yet you seem absolutely convinced that it's the only possible explanation.

it's hypocritical at best.

alasdair
 
you've recently criticized people for not supporting their claims with adequate sources.

and yet you seem to be doing exactly that here.

you're aware of an increase in sports deaths. you can present no evidence that covid vaccines are the cause of this increase yet you seem absolutely convinced that it's the only possible explanation.

it's hypocritical at best.

alasdair
How exactly would you prove it’s the vaccine unless someone died almost immediately after receiving it ? I’m pretty sure all you can do is look at the increase in deaths and look at how many of those are vaccinated, that paints a pretty clear picture I would think, especially since a control trial is almost non existent ? unless your just going with coincidence
 
i don't have to prove anything. you claim that vaccines are the cause of the increase. you're making the claim so the onus is on you to support that.

i believe you are assuming that a correlation implies causation and that you may be guilty of confirmation bias.

alasdair
 
Is there even a correlation? I'd like to see it as well

indeed.

So other than being told by the people who make/supply it telling you there is nothing that will change your mind, got it

i never said that.

but the onus is on you and, yet again, if you can't or won't substantiate claims you are making, people will draw their own conclusions.

alasdair
 
2MX1KQB.jpg
 
Top