Such a fucked up film. More art house horror than a straight up horror. Messes with your head a bit, good when stoned or benzo’d up. Mental health horror can be a sensitive topic to cover in a film but I think it handles it well.
3.5/5
The Batman (2022)
Dude just didnt make the cut IMO being BM.
Too long for the little action.
BM (actor) is an emo from the past. No offence against any genre just NOT BATMAN! I get the similarities but BM is an action figure not a pouter.
Meh
![]()
I hate superhero movies, I'm very apathetic about Batman even... and The Batman (2022) was THE best superhero movie I've ever seen. The pacing was fantastic, it didn't rely on being superhero-fanboy-nutz to follow, and while I think Michael Keaton was my favorite Batman, Pattinson is a close second. Bale was great too but the Nolan trilogy hasn't aged as well as I expected.^Ah bugger, was hoping it would be a decent one. Good to know, to hold out, until bored & flicking through channels, when it appears.![]()
Also, I just really, really feel sorry for folks who see Pattinson and Kristen Stewart as just 'emo' teenage actors... I get it, Twilight was a bad fever dream, but shit man, they're both fantastic actors. Stewart shoulda got best actress for Spencer (2021) and Pattinson shoulda earned a best actor for The Lighthouse. But I'm a weirdo who spends a lot of time at the theaters and so I get to see actors outside their stereotypes.BM (actor) is an emo from the past.
Somehow previous post was cut short.The Batman (2022) was THE best superhero movie I've ever seen.
I think we can all agree that either Clooney or Affleck was the worst hahah, though I have a special place in my heart for Uma Thurman as Ivy and Schwarzenegger as Mr. FreezeSomehow previous post was cut short.
Yeah this just goes to show how diverse we all are.
I am basically stuck with what bias I have left. May not be much but its mines gotdammit.
Dude aint the worse imo... just not my cup o' tea, if we can.
peace
Such a fucked up film. More art house horror than a straight up horror. Messes with your head a bit, good when stoned or benzo’d up. Mental health horror can be a sensitive topic to cover in a film but I think it handles it well.
3.5/5
I agree with your thoughts here; Good Time was a decently done film with mad decent acting, but to connect that in:He also did well in "Good Time", another somewhat more recent Pattinson film I've seen. The movie overall wasn't that great, it was OK but nothing to get too excited about, but Pattinson's performance was above-average for sure
I get why people are feeling this way. But if you read trivia, Matt Reeves (the director) wanted Pattinson for the role, because he wanted to cast Bruce Wayne as the opposite of the Playboy-Billionaire that Nolan did in his trilogy with Bale. I'm not much for the comics but supposedly he drew upon a period when Batman was reclusive and trying to fight an inner struggle about how to deal with the murder of his parents. Perhaps that insight might help others, it did for me.but he just comes off a lot more as an emo teenager (who somehow is also a badass fighter). I don't know. He just came off more as a sullen emo kid than someone who moonlights as a badass crime fighter.
Robert Pattinson's Bruce Wayne is partially inspired by Kurt Cobain. Writer/director Matt Reeves was listening to Nirvana when he wrote the first act with Pattinson in mind: "That's when it came to me that, rather than make Bruce Wayne the playboy version we've seen before, there's another version who had gone through a great tragedy and became a recluse. Kurt Cobain had a relationship with fame, where being famous was not his goal. He loved music, but the idea of being famous for music was a double edged sword for him. And that made me think of Rob Pattinson, actually. I felt that this rock-star vibe suited him well. After all, he became a pop-culture icon at a very young age and had to carry that burden too, and extricate himself from it to become the actor he is today."
makes sense, it does fit into the overall feel and differences from Nolan's filmsI get why people are feeling this way. But if you read trivia, Matt Reeves (the director) wanted Pattinson for the role, because he wanted to cast Bruce Wayne as the opposite of the Playboy-Billionaire that Nolan did in his trilogy with Bale. I'm not much for the comics but supposedly he drew upon a period when Batman was reclusive and trying to fight an inner struggle about how to deal with the murder of his parents. Perhaps that insight might help others, it did for me.
Oh I loved it, was never bored.So I guess if you go into The Batman expecting a superhero flick, you'll be bored to tears. As someone who hates superhero flicks, it struck me as phenomenal and leagues apart from the other Batman films.
Fair enough, I see where you're coming from. His tech was kinda downgraded from The Nolan trilogy, The Batmobile was less of a tank and more of a monster, he had to work more within' the realms of possibility, and as such seemed far less like a badass.I just never got the feeling like he was actually that dangerous or powerful in the movie, maybe that's the point/what they were going for?
If you like 70s films, I also recommend Taxi Driver (1976) with Robert DeNiro. I also liked Scarecrow (1973) with Al Pacino and Gene Hackman.Dog Day Afternoon (1975) I've been watching a lot of '70's films this week, and THIS one is fucking brilliant. Seriously, Al Pacino is beyond amazing. I mean, the entire cast was great, the story is SO well-written...I just loved it. Most films these days SUCK ASS, but the vast majority of older films I've seen are seriously entertaining. Later on I'm going to see The Godfather (part 1 & 2) for the third time. With buttered popcorn. I LOVE buttered popcorn!
"Take the gun. Leave the cannoli."![]()
I completely disagree, but I didn't really like Dances with Wolves nor The Last Samurai. I've watched both several times so I'm sure I won't change my mind.So I made a trip to Goodwill last week and found The Last Samurai (2003) on DVD for $3.99.... score. I've seen it before and TBH, it's the only Tom Cruise lead role I can stomach. Having grown up in the '80s and '90s, I've seen far too many of them. IMHO this was his first, last, and only great film.
For me it ranks up there with Dances With Wolves, but set in Japan. In fact, if Dances With Wolves had a sequel where Lt. John Dunbar was promoted to Captain and shipped to Japan, this could be it. But without all the sequel baggage. I feel it stands firm as a unique film in it's own right.