Pickledlemons
Bluelighter
The irony being that your belief in science relies on just as much dogma and "faith". You don't truly understand how electricity works. You don't truly understand why you have an electronic encyclopedia in your hand. You just have it. Science can attempt to explain how these things work, but even that is just a theory. Science is a still just a product of the flawed human mind.
You can not say with absolute certainty that God doesn't exist, just like you can't say that God exists either. It's typical human hubris to claim that you have absolute knowledge on any of these subjects. The universe is humongous and we are small travelers on a flying sphere. Reality could be ANYthing. A simulation. An alien game. The product of the big bang. Or the creation of a higher power.
Science and religion both require faith.
Claiming absolute knowledge is simply a human attempt to play God.
I dont want to get into hijacking this thread but I really have to address this... first of all I never said anything about god or faith in my post so just keep in mind those were introduced here by you.
Do you know what science is ? science is a method for determining the truth. This method works by making hypothesis, gathering evidence, doing experiments and trying to prove yourself wrong. If you try and try to prove yourself wrong, and you cant, well you just might have stumbled onto something new.
Now compare that with religion. religion is based on faith, faith is defined as believing without evidence. If you get an idea, you realize it does not line up with your religious scripture and you discard it. You new possibly great idea is lost to the world.
You see now while the scientific method has made almost all the discoveries in the last few hundred years, because they build on their knowledge. Religion has not, because they are a closed off bubble that doesnt allow change. If they do change its because science gets so evolved they start to lose face and move the goal posts.
So, science and religion are only same as far as they are both an attempt to fulfil holes in humans innate desire to understand the world. The difference is science actually furthers that understanding and religion does not.
science does not have: faith, scripture, deities or rituals. without those things, you are not a religion.
As for the ' you cant know god doesnt 100% exist'. In the same way you cant prove there isnt a giant invisible elephant in the room with you, but you dont live your life with the assumption that there is.
I never made the claim there was no god, if there is, they certainly arent the god any of us wrote down in our books thousands of years ago, those would be just the invention of our flawed mind, just that they haven't been improved over time like with science. And if they truly are the creater of the universe they should be on board with removing silly ancient boogey men from our beliefs to help us build a heaven here on earth. And that is what I have been trying to say.
Last edited: