LucidSDreamr
Bluelighter
Hmm... that does not sound pleasant. I think I could do it if it wouldn't be near impossible or probably very expensive to arrange.
Just to play devil's advocate though (and to find a reason to keep on rationalizing my addiction), or actually partly out of wanting to just understand better... I DO seem to recover. I do not experience any symptoms of cystitis for more than a few days of the few occasions that mild, and nonetheless of course extremely concerning, bladder awareness has occurred.
Typically, the more frequently I abuse dissociatives, the slower the recovery (longest was I think 5-7 days after a sustained period of ketamine, DCK and a few others for about a week). But most recently after a solid 6 months of abstinence, they faded far sooner, and took longer to develop (first time round I was essentially just binging for days, but taking the odd day off which is usually when I'd expect the bad stuff to start... this time round I had a full week in between sessions). This to me points to SOME recovery, even if arguably not complete recovery... I'm sure if I'd made that 6 months into a year, after which maybe I'd have even got past the grip that dissos seem to have on me, the bladder reaction, if any, would have been even less. What does this mean?
Obviously EVERYTHING I've described still means I am now at risk. But equally, is there recovery of some sort occurring, or is this just an illusion? What's recovering, and what isn't? I know you said you have little interest in digging up science papers for people but I'd really appreciate it if you could point me in the right direction.
As I've said your pattern of symptoms. Is exactly how mine began. Slight pain pressure and increase urged to piss for a day or two after using. It would go away then my bladder would feel totally normal again until the next time I used. This went on for a year.
Just because you stop feeling pain does not mean the damage magically healed and your bladder is as good as new. You simply just stop feeling pain.
IC is far more studied than KC, but at least at this point they look amd are treated the same by doctors and there even may be a biomechanistic similarity in how they damage the bladder (immunological response and cytokine storm type of responses happen and cause damage which some study shows K can catalyze).
There are forms of IC that are classified as purely inflammation in nature (camera inside the bladder shows no damage to inside of bladder). Yet the bladder itself is inflamed causing pain. Other forms of IC show ulcers and glomerulations inside the bladder wall upon viewing.
What might be happening is that after you use...your bladder becomes irritated and inflamed. It hurts then the swelling goes down. Repeated trauma like this combined with literally eating ulcers into your bladder wall layer will result in longer lasting episodes amd permanent dysfunction if use continues. How much can you use till you reach the point of no return? It's different for different ppl.
Where to find studies and scientific papers? I cited many on the first page of this thread. Start there in Google scholar and just keep searching topics.
To give a crude analogy, Trying to fix your K bladder with supplements and tea I would imagine is like trying to fix repeated spine trauma amd overuse with ice and anti inflammatory. Will it help? Maybe yes. Is it enough to override the extent of damage of repeated intense insult that will lead to herniated discs and serious damage? No.
Last edited: