yes but you can tell straight away if humans have tinkered with something- this you can't, that's a massive technological feat. so since you claim to know about it, why don't you inform the rest of us exactly how it was done?
Why are you acting like there is expert consensus on this issue, when there's not?
You're aware that multiple governments have launched intelligence investigations into the human-origin claim, right?
The matter isn't settled, not politically or scientifically. There are scientists who suspect human tinkering. And now we have evidence that the journal Nature wasn't airing their papers in order to back the Chinese government. So the consensus that you're making it seem like exists, doesn't actually exist, and may actually be manufactured to protect people in power. Do you really believe the journals are above corruption?
Where is the natural reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 if it came from nature?
If it came from wet market animals, then why is the natural reservoir for those animals coming up empty for the virus?
Why was patient zero 1000km from the alleged bat source?
Why did China block the WHO from auditing their lab process? What are they hiding?
Why is science trusting the say-so of the Chinese government, rather than deferring to science?
What evidence do you have that the virus can't be a product of gain-of-function research, when some virologists have come out saying that it wouldn't be that hard to conceal this fact?
You're asking us to prove a negative: that it isn't natural. Yet you won't provide any proof of your positive statement that it is natural? What is your virology expertise? What associations do you work with that do BSL 4 research? What is your qualification in gain-of-function modifications to viruses? Are you a virologist or epidemiologist?