birdup.snaildown
Greenlighter
assclass said:My feelings are hurt when we dont use facts to make policy.We live in a dangerous new world where people's feelings are more important than facts.
You're confusing me.
assclass said:My feelings are hurt when we dont use facts to make policy.We live in a dangerous new world where people's feelings are more important than facts.
I agree, but cops have much more power, so their actions have more impact, also in hectic situations some of the impartial disappears. All in all, there's no good way to tackle this specifically, I mentioned it, because it's an aspect that doesn't show up in stats.I'm sure there are some racists cops in the US. There are racist teachers too and racist journalists. These people need to be dealt with on an individual basis. It doesn't reflect on teachers or cops who are not racist.
I'm not going to just assume that a significant portion of police are racist, but (even if they were racist) they can still act impartially. Racist teachers aren't going to expose themselves as racists in this climate and neither are cops. Neither group can get away with it.
I again agree. That's why I like to talk about the specific incidents from an almost purely legal perspective.We don't know.
@dalpat077 Good to see you back brother, I haven't seen you around in awhile, hope you've been well and staying safe and healthy, I was thinking about you awhile back.Statistically correct? Maybe. Neutral? No way. Just read the notes. Exactly what I'm talking about.
Add up "Hispanic", "Other", and "Unknown". The numbers don't look that black (no pun intended) anymore. Add "Black" to that and then compare it to "White"?
Narrative baby! Narrative!![]()
Agreed. Unless they get on the stand, in this case, or hold a press conference and explain themselves, we are indeed never going to know why they did what they did. We are left to wonder and hope the judicial system gets it right. Before CCTV and cell phones I shudder to think what went on behind the scenes.I'm sure there are some racists cops in the US. There are racist teachers too and racist journalists. These people need to be dealt with on an individual basis. It doesn't reflect on teachers or cops who are not racist.
I'm not going to just assume that a significant portion of police are racist, but (even if they were racist) they can still act impartially. Racist teachers aren't going to expose themselves as racists in this climate and neither are cops. Neither group can get away with it.
Police in the US are crucified - and branded racists - for accidentally killing people... maybe this hidden racism that is raging inside people like Chauvin and Potter suddenly drives them to kill... or maybe they legitimately fucked up. We don't know.
American police are definitely harsher in the US than in Australia, but if you zoom in there are lots of areas that aren't heavily policed. Cops act differently in small towns than they do in Detroit.
Opportunity exists.
But that's been my argument all along. That there are all sorts of contributing factors, which should be analysed. You can't just arbitrarily exclude data because it doesn't suit your argument.No. That is not statistically significant, particularly when you consider the fact that we aren't taking into account all sorts of other crimes and contributing factors.
No? Police are not the primary agency responsible for reducing violent crime?
Again, not an argument I've made. The argument I've made is that US police kill too many people.I don't believe black people are being shot disproportionately simply because they're black.
No, he had it in his hands. At any time when the policeman showed up he could have dropped the gun, surrendered with his hands up, and been questioned by the cop or been arrested but he made the choice to keep the gun, run with it, and threaten or keep holding the gun. He was still holding the gun milliseconds before he was shot.Didn't the kid drop the gun before they shot him, though? If the gun is not longer being pointed at you, you the need to shoot has been eliminated.
Kinda like playing hide and seek with yourself isn't it?But that's been my argument all along. That there are all sorts of contributing factors, which should be analysed. You can't just arbitrarily exclude data because it doesn't suit your argument.
No? Police are not the primary agency responsible for reducing violent crime?
Again, not an argument I've made. The argument I've made is that US police kill too many people.
This is getting silly. This debate has basically become: me "US police kill more people than similar countries" you "They aren't racist". I appreciate the civil discussion, but you're just not arguing the same subject as me. It's baffling.
No, he had it in his hands.
I saw on the news yesterday, how he was holding the gun milliseconds before being shot, they had paused the video frame, and showed the full unedited video.please indicate on this image (of adam toledo just before he was shot) where the gun is "in his hands".:
![]()
thanks.
alasdair
I saw on the news yesterday, how he was holding the gun milliseconds before being shot, they had paused the video frame, and showed the full unedited video.
You gotta love that thumbnail that you posted. The media or you had to go frame by frame to find the 0.2 seconds where his hands were up and the gun was out of sight.
If you shoot a gun at a cop do not be surprised when you get shot and killed.
I saw on the news yesterday, how he was holding the gun milliseconds before being shot
If you shoot a gun at a cop
Hah! Based, and true. Did you actually read the article? This crazy girl threatened to kill her mum and herself.Racist? Or do they treat even white kids this bad?
![]()
'You did it to yourself,' officer tells 9-year-old girl pepper-sprayed by police
"Please don't do this to me," the child said to the police officer in Rochester, New York. "You did it to yourself, hon," the officer replied.www.nbcnews.com
She is 9.Hah! Based, and true. Did you actually read the article? This crazy girl threatened to kill her mum and herself.
That is not how it works when dealing with violent criminals/suspects, and the threat of the officer or others being hurt or killed by the suspect, especially if the person is a violent criminal, in a gang, threatens police or others, etc.all of them.
in the eyes of the law, they’re all innocent until proven guilty.
when your argument is, well they appear to have committed a crime so it’s ok to shortcut the system and for the police to execute them, you’re throwing due process and constitutional rights out the window.
alasdair
The cop that killed toledo, I can feel more for than Chauvin. Maybe its because the full video shows him crouching down at the end feeling shitty, and preforming cpr, and trying to save him.
He still shouldn't have shot the kid, who in no way threatened the cop with the gun, or started aiming or shooting it at him.
If she is, or was actually being abused, and not just crazy and making threats of violence and self-murder towards herself, there are any number of ways she can report the abuse.A 9 year old child trying to run away from home and wants to kill herself and her mom? No way she might be being abused and needs help. Pepper spray her. Show her the world doesn't give a fuck even more.
Where do you expect a 9 year old to learn that? Where does a 9 year old even learn about suicide ?If she is, or was actually being abused, and not just crazy and making threats of violence and self-murder towards herself, there are any number of ways she can report the abuse.