Oooh a BA! Let’s all kneel to that!bachelor's degree in law enforcement in 2006.



Oooh a BA! Let’s all kneel to that!bachelor's degree in law enforcement in 2006.
Education and intelligence doesn't matter when you let your emotions override your ability to perform your job.Officer Derek Chauvin's education and training (from Wikipedia) (so if it's inaccurate don't blame me).
"He served in the United States Army Reserve from 1996 to 2004, including two stints in the military police between 1996 and 2000. During that time, he also attended Inver Hills Community College from 1995 to 1999 and later transferred to Metropolitan State University where he graduated with a bachelor's degree in law enforcement in 2006."
The Defense is off to a terrible start. Anyone else see the first 2 witnesses testify? Mr. Nelson dropped the ball and didn't prepare his witnesses at all. They both looked foolish and were chewed up on cross. Lordy mama I wonder if Nelson is setting up an appeal for his client to receive a new trial on the basis of inadequate council once the guilty verdict comes in.
They were testifying as to his 2019 arrest ( no violence on that one ) as to : How the use of opioids affected Floyd's behavior in the 2019 incident. The judge has limited any testimony on that prior arrest. Both witnesses looked almost foolish in their testimony as they couldn't even remember details and didn't understand NOT to answer a question if an objection is made. The talking heads are agreeing now that Nelson is off to a very bad start. I didn't want to see this. I wanted Nelson to be magnificent in presenting the defense as I was hoping to gain a better perspective of the whole thing. It's early yet though and I hope to see Chauvin testify but I fear Nelson will have already talked him out of it ( if he even wants to ) as he won't be able to withstand the cross examination.His big was use of stigmatized drugs in the defence ? Just curious , too lazy to watch the whole thing , the media and the layman can’t be trusted to give an accurate report as they don’t understand drugs (including antidepressants, ADD meds, marijuana , caffeine and alcohol )
Thanks !
They were testifying as to his 2019 arrest ( no violence on that one ) as to : How the use of opioids affected Floyd's behavior in the 2019 incident. The judge has limited any testimony on that prior arrest. Both witnesses looked almost foolish in their testimony as they couldn't even remember details and didn't understand NOT to answer a question if an objection is made. The talking heads are agreeing now that Nelson is off to a very bad start. I didn't want to see this. I wanted Nelson to be magnificent in presenting the defense as I was hoping to gain a better perspective of the whole thing. It's early yet though and I hope to see Chauvin testify but I fear Nelson will have already talked him out of it ( if he even wants to ) as he won't be able to withstand the cross examination.
Hey void. The above 3 matters ( Covid, fentanyl, and cigarettes ) have been deemed ( so far ) as having no bearing on what happened.And How did it affect this ? I heard some people argue that , the covid , the fentanyl , the fact that he was a cig smoker , made so that Floyd couldn’t handle the pressure (I dunno if it’s true or not )
What did they say exactlyHey void. The above 3 matters ( Covid, fentanyl, and cigarettes ) have been deemed ( so far ) as having no bearing on what happened.
Have a pleasant day. I am going to quit watching for awhile myself. I expected Nelson to come out with a bang and so far it is a bust. I have only watched LIVE coverage today and have been mostly watching it after the fact as all the stations are replaying testimony. I wanted so much to garner a different perspective on this ( and maybe it's coming ) but I am unimpressed so far.@Pumpkin2021.
Thanks. Great unbiased coverage! Thanks! (Not joking by the way).
I've been unable to watch anything today and have something to take care of in a few minutes so will have to catch up tomorrow.
Thanks again.
Just that the experts agree that those 3 stipulations were not the Cause of Death. What really is the issue here is HOW Floyd died. Would he have lived continuing to smoke ciggies? Yes. Would he have lived on the dose of Fentanyl and methamphetamine he was on at the time? Yes. Would he have survived with the Covid virus he was carrying? ( he was asymptomatic ) Yes. Would he have lived if Chauvin had gotten off of him at the 5 minute mark? Yes. Did Chauvins extra 4 minutes on his neck and shoulders kill him? Yes. This is from medical experts and the Autopsy results.What did they say exactly
You're making assumptions here too. Let's examine...You're assuming intent in this case. Which there wasn't.