Conspiracies Bill Gates Denies Coronavirus Vaccine is 5G Mind Control Chip

[Xorkoth]

Bill Gates: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent …”

Access to reproductive health services and education lower birth rates, particularly unwanted pregnancies. Furthermore, increasing the level of health care greatly increases the expectation of children living, further decreasing birth rates as parents do not just keep having as many kids as possible hoping that enough with survive. He is describing how in first world countries, birth rate per capita tends to drop to reach homeostasis (or even eventually a slow reduction as in Europe). This is an example of choosing to interpret a quotation in a way that suits your narrative.

 

[Buzz Lightbeer]

Surprisingly interesting video, this is the main study he mentions: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf
It basically says that there is a correlation between the amount of vaccines given and an increase in rate in paralysis, they couldn't prove there's a causality but they indicate that it's very likely.
I will drop this link here with comments on the study mentioned: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/13/htm it mainly points out that there are some serious flaws in the development and analysis of initial statistics, plus, it's India............ For completeness, here's the reply to the reply. In general it's pretty obvious that vaccinations were a net + on the amount of lives saved, the paper in question even mentions this. So I have to guess that the whole story is somehow connected to Bill Gates in that the Indian government allowed Gates to help with it's polio program, and they used vaccines resulting in higher paralysis rates?? But I mean.... This is like me making the connection to Gates myself because it wasn't mentioned in the video, and it's the whole premise of accusations, maybe it was mentioned elsewhere.

So, it's the Indian government organizing a polio vaccination campaign, saving MILLIONS of lives by doing so, and then we need to apply some twisted logic to connect all these dots based on ONE paper (over a 20 year span, and other (Indian) scientists had their doubts about it) to evil mastermind Bill Gates

Enlighten me where I went wrong @JGrimez I'm legit interested in this topic, I will absorb any reasonable information you throw at me.

 

[Buzz Lightbeer]

The rest of the video is about tetanus and Christians, should be good fun, maybe some other time

 

[JGrimez]

In general it's pretty obvious that vaccinations were a net + on the amount of lives saved

I would not automatically take this assumption as a fact. It may be incorrect.

This is a speech by investigative reporter Del Bigtree, proving that all vaccines are not properly tested for safety or are proven to be effective, if we adhere to the scientific method.
He has won lawsuits against government agencies so his science is sound and all claims can be verified:


'The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety'

 

[JGrimez]

Bill Gates' promoted the book 'How to Lie With Statistics'

 

[Buzz Lightbeer]

They successfully eliminated polio in India, basically forever... come on man

 

[JGrimez]

They successfully eliminated polio in India, basically forever... come on man

Polio was virtually eradicated when people ceased gallivanting in feces.
How Plumbing (Not Vaccines) Eradicated Disease

And in the process of "eliminating polio" they paralyzed an extra half a million children? - "NPAFP is a disease that is clinically indistinguishable from polio and twice as deadly that is caused by the live, weakened, polio viruses in the vaccine."

 

[Buzz Lightbeer]

Polio was virtually eradicated when people ceased gallivanting in feces.
How Plumbing (Not Vaccines) Eradicated Disease

And in the process of "eliminating polio" they paralyzed an extra half a million children? - "NPAFP is a disease that is clinically indistinguishable from polio and twice as deadly that is caused by the live, weakened, polio viruses in the vaccine."

Wrong, it IS distinguishable, apparently:

[PDF] Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance: the surveillance strategy for poliomyelitis eradication To achieve poliomyelitis eradication, the World Health Organization recommends that countries conduct surveillance for cases of acute flaccid pa

AFP surveillance substantially increases the sensitivity of the surveillance system and allows it to detect paralytic poliomyelitis due to wild poliovirus transmission in the population and helps to monitor progress in polio eradication when polio exists in a country as well as when polio is...

www.semanticscholar.org

can't find the full paper rn but I can find hundreds of other sources, abstract says enough already.

And in the process of "eliminating polio" they paralyzed an extra half a million children?

This is disputed, was the point of my post. Some other doctor here says (interesting article either way, summarizes a lot of key info):
"Inadequate sanitation, insufficient hygiene, human habits and population density have likely created an ideal storm for virus transmission. Among these viruses are some capable of causing NPAFP. This is on top of the many non-viral causes."

The point is that the connection between NPAFP and the vaccine is so thin (except the proven NPAFP rate per vaccination or something). You have nothing except the one paper, it's all there is, and it's some vague correlation based on shady stats that nobody else has cared enough about to draw similar connections, strange huh for tens of thousands of children every year

 

[cduggles]

Access to reproductive health services and education lower birth rates, particularly unwanted pregnancies. Furthermore, increasing the level of health care greatly increases the expectation of children living, further decreasing birth rates as parents do not just keep having as many kids as possible hoping that enough with survive. He is describing how in first world countries, birth rate per capita tends to drop to reach homeostasis (or even eventually a slow reduction as in Europe). This is an example of choosing to interpret a quotation in a way that suits your narrative.

Thank you for writing this... I almost responded but then saw this little gem.

 

[✿Dai₷y✿]

As much as I hate to disagree with you:

Don't make the same mistake that I made and as @alasdairm so kindly pointed out in one of my earlier posts. A lot of these conspiracy theory videos etc. are made by or broadcast by some "ZXY987 Network broadcasting from Donkey Shit City, Republica de Las Paranoias" (after having very carefully and craftily edited of course). Not saying CNN & FOX & Co. are angels of course. But you do get worse!

Yeah sure they are but I'm the spirit of being on topic which is Bill Gates weighing in on this, does anyone seriously expect his exposure to clear anything up at all for people who think there's something in this?

Of course fucking not, theres always going to be conspiracy theorists because people in power are never ever transparent.

 

[emkee_reinvented]

Didn't he take over Linux to. Or is that a false rumor?

 

[JessFR]

Yeah sure they are but I'm the spirit of being on topic which is Bill Gates weighing in on this, does anyone seriously expect his exposure to clear anything up at all for people who think there's something in this?

Of course fucking not, theres always going to be conspiracy theorists because people in power are never ever transparent.

There's always going to be conspiracy theorists because some people much prefer the idea that the world is orderly but run by malevolent entities you can fight, than the truth which is that its run but inept morons who barely know what they're doing and that bad shit regularly happens for no good reason with noone to blame.

 

[JGrimez]

People don't prefer that there are psychopathic cliques running governments and politicians are merely their pawns.

Your attempted 'explanation' of "whoops sometimes bad things happen" completely ignores a large proven segment of how things operate in this world. Imagine being led to believe that powerful people making covert plans is somehow illogical or unbelievable - especially in the light of so much classified information that has leaked. The power of psy-op brainwashing.

For eg, thinking that 9/11 happened due to incompetence. How come nobody in the US was held accountable for their negligence? None of your phantom inept people were charged or prosecuted.

 

[JGrimez]

Wrong, it IS distinguishable, apparently:

[PDF] Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance: the surveillance strategy for poliomyelitis eradication To achieve poliomyelitis eradication, the World Health Organization recommends that countries conduct surveillance for cases of acute flaccid pa

AFP surveillance substantially increases the sensitivity of the surveillance system and allows it to detect paralytic poliomyelitis due to wild poliovirus transmission in the population and helps to monitor progress in polio eradication when polio exists in a country as well as when polio is...

www.semanticscholar.org

can't find the full paper rn but I can find hundreds of other sources, abstract says enough already.


This is disputed, was the point of my post. Some other doctor here says (interesting article either way, summarizes a lot of key info):
"Inadequate sanitation, insufficient hygiene, human habits and population density have likely created an ideal storm for virus transmission. Among these viruses are some capable of causing NPAFP. This is on top of the many non-viral causes."

The point is that the connection between NPAFP and the vaccine is so thin (except the proven NPAFP rate per vaccination or something). You have nothing except the one paper, it's all there is, and it's some vague correlation based on shady stats that nobody else has cared enough about to draw similar connections, strange huh for tens of thousands of children every year

You only need one paper if it's accurate. When you look at the politics behind this then you can easily see why that paper would be 'disputed'.
It's easy to dismiss science when it doesn't fit one's preconceived notions.

 

[sekio]

I find it funny that there are observed cases of acute flaccid paralysis in nonvaccinated children too.
[ref]: Of 37 cases with vaccine status reported from the CDPH, CHCO, and PCH cohorts, 34 (92% ) had received all recommended vaccines and 3 (8% ) were unvaccinated because of personal belief exemptions.

 

[finitelifeform]

I'm not sure about mind control chips per se, what is concerning however is Bill's ascent to health and social policy power and influence through his wealth, connections and of course his own foundation. He's linked heavily with what is going on during the alleged 'pandemic'. He's been involved for decades only the global pandemic narrative that would, and has, changed the world hadn't been triggered just yet. Having said that, Bill Gates has funded all global pandemic simulation exercises of recent years and been the main facilitator of them having occured. The one I'm sure most people are familiar with is the most recent coronavirus pandemic simulation exercise that coincidentally happened only a few months before the 'outbreak' in China. Before this one he funded and facilitated many others.

It is concerning how the topic for many years has been a global pandemic scenario and that Bill Gates has been actively involved while attempting to get biochips out into the general population, biometric IDs, vaccines and otherwise alter the landscape for social and health care. It sounds innocent but when you alter these areas, you alter peoples lives at the same time and you can conveniently make changes on a mass scale that otherwise wouldn't happen. The global health emergency we now face is down to the fact that the new prescribed policies in place deem it necessary to drastically alter society because of some existential threat to peoples health and wellbeing. Bill Gates is central in this area, as are many other extremely wealthy and powerful figures. It seems when you have more money than the rest of the world, you tend to setup 'philantrophic' foundations to then find ways to use your money and influence to get your fingers into all the pies that make up reality for the rest of us.

In regards to mind chips, it is becoming apparent that we are drawing closer to intefacing with computers through some sort of mind/brain/computer connection. Elon Musk is one key advocate for this technology. But this is only the limited mainstream awareness of this technology. It's going to happen at some point in the near future. It's not hard to see how this can then be used for ulterior motives. All you have to do is look at how computers changed everybodys life but now how that technology also controls everybodys life all the way down to your smartphone. What is most concerning is how the majority of people who would have one implanted/installed/whatever wouldn't know anything about it, much like how most people don't understand how a website works, how networks work, how computers work etc. We live in an age where science and technology is everything but at the same time nobody understands anything about that science and technology, except for a few. I believe Carl Sagan can be thanked for my butchered quote of his.

 

[Buzz Lightbeer]

You only need one paper if it's accurate. When you look at the politics behind this then you can easily see why that paper would be 'disputed'.
It's easy to dismiss science when it doesn't fit one's preconceived notions.

The politics? You mean, eradicating polio from India?
Mate, one paper yes, yet you only ''believe'' that one and choose to ignore all other stuff. You're guilty yourself of what you accuse others of. That paper didn't even prove a causal relationship, and as sekio and I said, there are other causes for NPAFP too. I wanted to believe but the key is in not going in blind beforehand

 

[JGrimez]

You mean, eradicating polio from India?

Protecting the vaccine industry. If this incident is indeed true it would be disastrous if it became accepted public knowledge. One reason why fact-checkers are using strawmen to try and debunk it.
Similar to why another CDC whistleblower came forward, Judith Zimmerman, exposing how Utah health authorities covered up some of the high numbers of autism rates (I wonder why they would obfuscate those numbers?).

 

[Xorkoth]

It's wild to me how people have vilified Bill Gates so hard when he's one of the few billionaires actually using his wealth to do something positive for the world, most notably massively reducing case counts and deaths due to malaria. Yet to many, it is self-evident and beyond discussion that he is anything but an evil satanic beast bent on world destruction, mind control, and pretty much all of the other ills befalling the world, real or imagined. I'd be pretty sad if I were him.

He got rich because he was the CEO of Microsoft. He then started a foundation to try to help people in Africa and elsewhere. There's nothing mysterious about why he's involved in world health organizations.

 

[dalpat077]

It's wild to me how people have vilified Bill Gates so hard when he's one of the few billionaires actually using his wealth to do something positive for the world, most notably massively reducing case counts and deaths due to malaria. Yet to many, it is self-evident and beyond discussion that he is anything but an evil satanic beast bent on world destruction, mind control, and pretty much all of the other ills befalling the world, real or imagined. I'd be pretty sad if I were him.

He got rich because he was the CEO of Microsoft. He then started a foundation to try to help people in Africa and elsewhere. There's nothing mysterious about why he's involved in world health organizations.

True story (in bold). Funds are requested of the Foundation and paid to the The Global Fund who oversees the distribution of said funds. Ask me how I know (or rather don't). The oversight is ironclad so if nothing else the funds are used for their intended purposes (there are many) (this unlike funds being directly paid to government organizations and pilfered away to the tune of billions on an annual basis).

Our Partners

If we are going to win this fight, a sustained effort from more of us is essential....

www.goodbyemalaria.com

Anyway. For sure not a man, so far as I can tell, that's trying to KILL OFF the population!

To be very honest (and I've noted this before but got a slap on the wrist for it but I'll say it again): as to WHY (all) these people do this type of thing is beyond me. There's (globally) too many of us, they'll/we'll never ever be able to create enough employment opportunities to ensure that everybody has a job and is able to support themselves and their families, and that's all there is to it. But that's why he has a Foundation and I don't I guess (aside from the obvious i.e. funds).

The above all being said (the above paragraph anyway):

I've been putting a lot of thought into this questionable patent and I have to say that after putting in such thought: could be it's not that bad an idea in light of what I've just said above. As I understand said patent (and in my own words): users are monitored and rewarded (presumably in something like Bitcoin?) for certain actions. And the monitoring is done NOT by implanting chips in peoples heads (for goodness sake) but monitoring of electronic devices (cellphones, those wearable devices, computers, notebooks, whatever, you get the picture). A person could therefore be rewarded for, as an example, clicking on a particular advertisement or web page or whatever. What could this mean? Well couple that with the global push to ensure that everybody on the planet has Internet access (possibly eventually totally free Internet access). Imagine what that could mean to those that I referenced in my above paragraph? And before you laugh out loud: you'd be surprised to know that in Africa there's a phenomenon that exists that even people who cannot eat have mobile phones! I shit you not!

And after such thought: I think I've come to realize that the only reason I don't like Bill Gates is because he did away with Windows XP!