• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: Xorkoth | Madness

Toxic masculinity isn't real

Male and female sexes are distinct from the male and female principles, there is no inherent toxicity in either.

Male toxicity is a term in political theory that is in actuality individual human greed. Everyone exhibits it and to ascribe it to one sex is simplifying things. All humans have a propensity to be greedy and oppress others to gain power and possessions.
 
Male and female sexes are distinct from the male and female principles, there is no inherent toxicity in either.

Male toxicity is a term in political theory that is in actuality individual human greed. Everyone exhibits it and to ascribe it to one sex is simplifying things. All humans have a propensity to be greedy and oppress others to gain power and possessions.

Try telling that to the 'woke' generation mate...
 
i feel if there is a hell im going,
👇
its haunted me for years
IMO, this is hell. Doesn't get any worse, ime. Whatever it is that haunts us.

OT:
I would agree that over-masculinity is conscious and embraced by ass holes, be they man, woman or child. I mean, some tops in the L community adopt some undesirable masculine traits as an affectation re role-model.
Am I looking at this right? 🤔
 
Ptah, have you had any kids yet? I swear the things that come out of even toddlers is sometimes quite startling. Little Hitlers from the cradle (one of my own, BTW). :cool:
 
This is something we can agree to disagree on.

I specified that I meant the west by saying there's no oppression. You're straw-manning here once again.
"Oh, you said there is no oppression!"
Yes, I did. I specified it to mean western societies. Can you argue against it?
all good homie, just some healthy banter
 
I think this whole hormone angle misses the point. Toxic masculinity has nothing to do with hormones and it has nothing to do with being "too manly".

Toxic masculinity is a label for culturally reenforced expectations of how men should behave that are harmful to society. Men included.


All the guys here who are terrified that normal expressions of sexuality make them gay? And that's bad because.... The idea of them being gay is intrinsically undesirable?

That's an example of toxic masculinity hurting males. It's guys having anxieties and fears that are totally pointless because they fear how they'll be seen if they aren't "male enough" according to some dumbass cultural ideas of how men should behave.
Well, that's homophobia, specifically.

"Toxic masculinity" is an attempt to generalize the concept of "homophobia" to reflect the fact that many cultures have a construction "gay" which men try to avoid being seen as even though those cultures don't always use the same concept of "gay". For example, in central Asia and ancient Rome, "gay" is closer to meaning "submissive" so performing cunnilingus is "gay" but topping a guy is not. What these cultures have in common is a social norm of exclusion of those determined to be unmasculine with a culturally assumed association between unmasculinity and sexual behaviors.

This exclusion norm leads to social rituals where individuals are pressured into toxic behaviors in order to avoid being seen as unmasculine, to wit "gay". The theory is that social norms of masculinity in some cases are enforced by reference to a (usually small) group of excluded males who are subject to ritual abuse. What is important is that the norm works by enforcing the fear of masculinity loss. In a sense this is a purity norm. The sexual norms are continued to emotional norms so that in the US men will avoid close friendships with each other and in central Asia men will avoid being subservient to women because this is seen to suggest the unacceptable sexual behavior, sort of like how women wearing revealing clothing suggest promiscuity, an un-normative trait.

This generalization may be hoped to shed light on Western norms, but a big problem is that the words "toxic masculinity" just looks like "toxic" + "masculinity" and so people think that:
  • toxic masculinity is the theory that masculinity is toxic
  • toxic masculinity refers to any masculine behaviors that are toxic
  • toxic masculinity refers to hormonally or neurologically influenced toxic male behaviors
  • toxic masculinity refers to any socially encouraged toxic behaviors of men
none of which is accurate.

While I'm at it I might as well throw in my shower-thought hypothesis that Christian antisexuality became popular partially because it shut down Roman toxic masculinity by stigmatizing the behaviors used to enforce it; specifically, Romans expected men to be promiscuous and sexually dominant.
 
Last edited:
👇

IMO, this is hell. Doesn't get any worse, ime. Whatever it is that haunts us.

OT:
I would agree that over-masculinity is conscious and embraced by ass holes, be they man, woman or child. I mean, some tops in the L community adopt some undesirable masculine traits as an affectation re role-model.
Am I looking at this right? 🤔
ive known some ppl like that,
i was just couldnt control my emotions in arguments a few times only when drunk
i was never a sexist women hater or anything, im a fool, i havent done it scence, i had a frend who would hit his girlfrend a lot and there kid, shits not right
 
Ok, I realize this is an extremely controversial and sensitive subject so please hear me out before you crucify me.

I was listening to a podcast and this subject was brought up.

Toxic masculinity isn't really a thing.

If a man is being "toxically masculine" it has nothing to do with masculinity. That person is just a piece of shit. If you beat women, display dominance to the detriment to others or any other signs of "toxic masculinity" you are simply a fucking asshole. Period. It has nothing to do with hormones or being a man. Real men do not hit women (in 99% of cases).

There has never been the concept of toxic femininity. In my view, extreme femininity is generally seen as a good thing by everyone else (my own opinion is a little more complex). Everything is duality. You can't have toxic masculinity without toxic femininity. Females can be extremely toxic and abusive, too. Again, there is no such thing as toxic masculinity - that person is just a fucking asshole piece of shit!

And to be clear: NO I am not trying to condone or excuse men who are assholes or abusive. I am NOT trying to explain domestic abuse or anything of that nature. I am simply playing devil's advocate and being logical about things.

I DO believe in things like the patriarchy to an extent, I DO believe women in general are oppressed even in these modern times.

However I DO NOT believe masculinity itself should be called toxic. It has nothing to do with toxic behaivor.
 
Also, I really hate the term "nice guy". It implies kindness in males is cringey and abnormal. "Nice guys" aren't bad because they are kind - it's various other reasons and they end up being toxic in their own way.

Can't be toxic, can't be nice.... what a men supposed to be? Are men more criticized for their behavior than women? Toxic, alpha, beta, nice guys.... I haven't heard any similar terms to describe women or create some weird hierarchy for their personalities
 
Last edited:
There are expected roles for women, too, and I'm sure women have their own stuff to deal with. But men have a lot to deal with, too. We're all just trapped in the society we were born into, and pressured to fit into those roles. I'm thankful that these days, in America at least, I can be whoever the fuck I want. I don't care if people disapprove. There are a lot of changes in the world today, and some of them are terrifying, but this is one I like. We are more free to be who we want to be than ever before. Well maybe not ever, I wasn't alive in all times in all cultures, but it's more acceptable in my culture to be who you want to be than it probably ever has been. A lot of people are becoming who they want to be, and some might have to explore to find it. Some people are scared by that change, but I think it's beautiful.
 
I think this whole hormone angle misses the point. Toxic masculinity has nothing to do with hormones and it has nothing to do with being "too manly".

Toxic masculinity is a label for culturally reenforced expectations of how men should behave that are harmful to society. Men included.


All the guys here who are terrified that normal expressions of sexuality make them gay? And that's bad because.... The idea of them being gay is intrinsically undesirable?

That's an example of toxic masculinity hurting males. It's guys having anxieties and fears that are totally pointless because they fear how they'll be seen if they aren't "male enough" according to some dumbass cultural ideas of how men should behave.

It's nothing to do with testosterone, it's just destructive gendered cultural standards. That's it.

Generally speaking though no I don't think almost any women exhibit toxic masculinity since the very idea is about conforming to destructive ideas of what it means to be a man. If you're not a man you aren't being pressured to conform to those ideas anyway.

The mistake people make is they think toxic masculinity is an attack on males. It's not. It's an attack on bad cultural norms about what it means to be a man. Norms that hurt men and women alike and are completely arbitrary.
You are being very selective. First, regardless of any definition we pick for the term, it is bandied about very freely and fluidly in media, in academia and in people's conversation. And it is very often applied to masculine traits that are largely intrinsic Iand based on a combination of our biochemical make up andevolved neurology. I see competitiveness labelled toxic. I see being less talkative, less emotionally expressive, less eye contact labelled as toxic when what they are is not female tendencies. Boys are routinely corrected out of natural male behaviour--being rambunctious, loud, risk taking, aggression.

Masculinity and anything perceived as masculine is constantly under attack. The converse is true as well. Behaviours that are frowned upon become gendered as masculine, since masculinity is toxic after all. I always hear about "manspreading" but have only ever seen it occasionally in sullen teenagers of any gender, whereas I see women with bags spread about them, who do not move them even on a full bus, yet we have no derogatory word about all women because many do this. I hear mansplaining almost exclusively as "I don't have to hear your rebuttal because your a man". The actual phenomenon of know-it-all's, and people who try and explain something a person already knows well and didn't ask about is something men and women both do. I would argue that feminist ideology indoctrinate the behaviour into women. I would also argue that men aren't valued intrinsically as beings with value, we are valued for skills, accomplishments, status, providing. In that context if a man sometimes wants to be seen to be knowledgeable and hopefully useful is that really so toxic? What's women's excuse for being perpetually in lecture mode?

Toxic masculinity isn't a useful concept not just because it has no definition that people stick to, but because it is applied in a blame fashion as an individual failing that springs from another ideological fancy, the patriarchy, and somehow that always parses out to not hold 51% of the population. The half who do most acculturation of children, the half who do most teaching, the half who tend to control and administrate social functioning, the half who most psychology and psychotherapy was built from and for, the half who write all the rules and criticisms about gender and sex., that half somehow bears no responsibility for any of these cultural, psychological, ideological shackles men bear the burden of. The discourse of toxic masculinity is one of the meanest in spirit, punitive and judgemental. It never treats as legitimate rules men are raised with, just like you didn't, you bad ically belittled men if they fall prey to silly ideas of manhood. Manhood is rigid and narrowly defined and heavily policed by men and women. It is an impoverished austere existance compared to the wide open field that comes with a culture wide full time validation industry for female identities, roles, development mean ours, dress, etc. The very idea that people with so much freedom and so much authority and a monopoly on unquestioned revealed truth about gender would castigate and belittle men for the lives we are dealt is abhorrent beyond all reason. It is pure malevolent pathological misandry.

Women's discourse never starts with even the question, let alone onsideration of the value of male ways, the functions they served and often still serve. Men do every single one of the heavy, dangerous, body destroying jobs. Do you think it would be easy to do those jobs if they were reconstructed in feminine ways out of being stoic, idealizing toughness, being insensitive to suffering and buttoning down there internal lives to get th shitty but necessary job done? Nothing masculine is ever valued just as the incredible societies that evolved over the years and have steadily become more just, egalitarian, rational, safe, and aspirational for centuries should also be acknowledged in the discourse on the so-called patriarchy? But that doesn't happen because we, our whoke culture, is generations derp into the business of denigrating masculinity. Misandry has no time to be honest about men.

In anthropology. When you study a culture, you are supposed to try and leave your norms at the door and whatever you are witnessing, even if it looks silly, pointless or superstitious you are supposed to treat it as existing for a reason and uncover that. Most of the time, a cultural feature that looks absurd to us, in its roundabout way provides a value to the culture. When we train dogs, we observe their behaviour and reactions with the assumption there is a valid reason worth understanding so we can interact more productively with the dog. We give dogs more credit and benefit of the doubt than men. We give Tribes who believe ghosts live in trees and you can make curses out of snot are better validated than men.

Feminism's deconstruction if manhood, masculinity, maleness is toxic, its hate based and it starts with its conclusions and generates discourse arguments to reach the conclusions. It is not difficult to observe because there is nothing more common in feminism to look at a situation and find oppression, misogyny, and patriarchy at work and to find the same in the opposite situation or any variation contemporary feminists feel things are worse than ever. My government is feminist, named half the cabinet for women, speaks out harshly against men and for women and backs it with policy and spending. The education system is run by and fine tuned for females and their general learning styles. As a result, at every single level, men are failing, dropping out and are a shrinking minority. Not only are learning methods not where their strengths are, but they are fed a steady diet of how lousy they are, how dangerous and predatory they are, how low their empathy is, how they don't cooperate properly, how they can't understand consent, how they aren't really to be trusted with childcare, how they are violent, cruel and control women in a rape culture they supposedly own and designed for the control and torture of women. Meanwhile, aside from the education crisis with males, the vadt majority of violence victims are male, half of domestic violence comes from wives, the vast majority of suicides, addictions, overdoses, arrests, charges, convictions and sentences are male(even when compared by equal crime, they are heavily penalized by virtue of being male. 95% of homeless people are men. Men and boys are murdered and go missing at a rate of 4 to 1 compared to women and girls, but only the women and girls get talked about. There is an international academic, media infused, bureaucratic ideological propaganda producing culture defining apparatus that works full time year round, decade after decade, run by women and devoted to writing the narratives we live by that are based on gathering entitlements, privelege and power for women and leveraging it through a vast religion based on misandry and shaming men. Women have institutions within every institution, they have extra laws and policies, extra rights, they control the family. Their ideology offers no place for men, no sympathy, no understanding, no inclusion, no pathway out of the doghouse. Feminism actively fights to retain spotlight, attention, media and funding always in their demands and tries to suppress, discredit, dissemble or shame any attempt to address the many many crises that are absolutely gendered and it is men suffering. There is no place in a fair just world for the manipulative, controlling, shaming feminist lens called toxic masculinity. It does nothing but twist and distort. It doesn't honour men, doesn't validate the worlds that shape them, doesn't examine maleness with any honesty, or any science or other discipline for that matter, it doesn't work to make a world where different masculinity can flourish. What is most toxic about masculinity is the trauma it has suffered for decades under the autocratic rule of feminism. It was corrupt and hateful by design and cannot be tweaked into usefulness. We need deprogrammiing from all of it if we are to be fair and inclusive to nen and honour their role in the world and our species.

I've typed this all out on a crappy phone with a onscreen keyboard that is a cross between haunted and senile. As well, I've typed with fervour. The combination may be a mess.

The topic is close to my heart. I've worked with and fought for resources for men who are homeless, addicted, mentally ill for years and had my eyes opened wide to the systemic disparities and prejudices and how hard women work to keep it that way. Feminism is more corrupt doublespeak than anything Orwell came up with to satirize with. I consider feminism criminal and fascist and the greatest danger we face in the immediate times. I'm also aware that Nothing along those lines from the mildest suggestion to a 3am manifesto has a hope in hell of gaining any traction. I've just become fed up and will speak out angrily and vehemently anywhere I can. I come by it honestly. I spent most of my life on the left, a feminist, an activist, I've read my Foucault and kristeva. The perspective I have, I got on the inside. I still do, as the whole social work industry is women and explicitly taught using feminist socialist oppression victim models with hyper focus on women and groups who often are actually victims thst women politically align themselves with to retain oppressed status. Social work, health services, gov't grants and policy, family courts and and our police forces codified men as the problem to deal with. It's an ugly ugly world. Most days I'd happily see it razed to the ground.
 
No? Because it sure seems like a suspicious amount of the time even when women are doing exactly the same job, the pay decreases.
When does that happen? Even the phonebook sized study the feminists do annually only shows a gap when you add up all the male warned dollars and female earned dollars. When hours worked, time off, chosen profession is factored in, there is virtually no gap. There are a few select places where men tend to make more, and a few where women tend to make more. But this myth that women are making 73 or 82¢ for a makecdolkarscwork needs to be put to bed as it isn't supported by data, or in other words the propaganda isn't supported by reality.

Another thing no one talks about in this fucking gap nonsense? 80% of all money spent is spent by women. Or do we talk about taxes and services? Men make a net contribution of taxes to society to the order of six figures, I read, compared to women who are net deficit, they use more government services than the tax they pay.

So you have virtually no gap. You have men's main motivation with money is to give it to women. You have a society paid for by men to serve women. What more could we possibly do to make the world feel more fair to poor oppressed women?
 
If toxic masculinity exists, so does toxic femininity.



It is more common in Africa, but nobody says "African toxicity" do they?

It is problematic to apply the label toxic to a gender or race.
All violent crimes against women have been steadily declining for fifteen years, and they were always the least frequent crime category. They look like a lot more because no other victims and no other crimes matter to people. This is a fact in Canada, it is recorded in all our data gathered at stats can and our gov't ignores its ok wn information and wages campaigns, makes policies and spends as though there was a rape apocalypse going on.

I don't understand how we became a world that has no interest in facts. When we just gave into fundamentalist ideologues. When was the last time you did some fact checking in feminist information? When I find things actually annotated half the time the notes are fake, or they are circular leading back to more rhetoric from the same sources. Some of the most famous rape numbers that have been repeated ad nauseum my whole life were tracked back to an editorialist who made her numbers up because they felt intuitively truthy to her. I read one famous feminist study that was being quoted as the proof of rape culture and showed all women were being assaulted. If you stopped and read the study, the crucial question which was yes or no was all inclusive from violent left for dead rape, to have you ever felt uncomfortable when you thought a man was looking at you. There was a long list of potential experiences including hugs that didn't feel right, being hit on by a guy you weren't interested, been whistled at, had an argument with boyfriend where he raised his voice, all the wY to violent assaults as nd gang rapes. You were to answer yes or no if you'd ever experienced d anything like anything in the list. And for this, men are being crucified in a culture where the crime considered most vile and unacceptable is violence against women. Men are trained from toddler hood it's lije the first rule of civilization, never hurt women. They've always been a special class, not oppressed. Why does everyone buy this bullshit cooked up by a gang of borderlines raging with persecution complexes? Whenever someine tries to feed me a line my eyes go wide and I say, where the hell do you live because it ain't like that around here? If women were treated as men are society would declare a crisis and devote its every resource to fighting it. But I find there are many, not jyst women, but MN en too who take a grotesque satisfaction in the idea of male suffering, male failure. Facebook is opposed to protecting the gender category if men from hate speech. The boss of the censorship division went in record in Wired saying she wanted to protect women's rights to hate men and shout it out. A particularly virulent hate mongering feminist wrote in the Washington Post a couple years ago that women should have not just the right to hate men, but that it was a responsibility. They very literally talk about us the way Germans talked about Jewish people in the thirties. And everyone seems to think it's fine.
 
Japhy Ryder said:
I don't understand how we became a world that has no interest in facts.

I blame the left. They increasingly insist that feelings are more important than facts. As long as they get what they want, distorting a million facts along the way doesn't matter.
 
Ok, I realize this is an extremely controversial and sensitive subject so please hear me out before you crucify me.

I was listening to a podcast and this subject was brought up.

Toxic masculinity isn't really a thing.

If a man is being "toxically masculine" it has nothing to do with masculinity. That person is just a piece of shit. If you beat women, display dominance to the detriment to others or any other signs of "toxic masculinity" you are simply a fucking asshole. Period. It has nothing to do with hormones or being a man. Real men do not hit women (in 99% of cases).

There has never been the concept of toxic femininity. In my view, extreme femininity is generally seen as a good thing by everyone else (my own opinion is a little more complex). Everything is duality. You can't have toxic masculinity without toxic femininity. Females can be extremely toxic and abusive, too. Again, there is no such thing as toxic masculinity - that person is just a fucking asshole piece of shit!

And to be clear: NO I am not trying to condone or excuse men who are assholes or abusive. I am NOT trying to explain domestic abuse or anything of that nature. I am simply playing devil's advocate and being logical about things.

I DO believe in things like the patriarchy to an extent, I DO believe women in general are oppressed even in these modern times.

However I DO NOT believe masculinity itself should be called toxic. It has nothing to do with toxic behaivor.



Ok, I realize this is an extremely controversial and sensitive subject so please hear me out before you crucify me.

I was listening to a podcast and this subject was brought up.

Toxic masculinity isn't really a thing.

If a man is being "toxically masculine" it has nothing to do with masculinity. That person is just a piece of shit. If you beat women, display dominance to the detriment to others or any other signs of "toxic masculinity" you are simply a fucking asshole. Period. It has nothing to do with hormones or being a man. Real men do not hit women (in 99% of cases).

There has never been the concept of toxic femininity. In my view, extreme femininity is generally seen as a good thing by everyone else (my own opinion is a little more complex). Everything is duality. You can't have toxic masculinity without toxic femininity. Females can be extremely toxic and abusive, too. Again, there is no such thing as toxic masculinity - that person is just a fucking asshole piece of shit!

And to be clear: NO I am not trying to condone or excuse men who are assholes or abusive. I am NOT trying to explain domestic abuse or anything of that nature. I am simply playing devil's advocate and being logical about things.

I DO believe in things like the patriarchy to an extent, I DO believe women in general are oppressed even in these modern times.

However I DO NOT believe masculinity itself should be called toxic. It has nothing to do with toxic behaivor.
Hey I am glad I spotted this post ... was just musing about certain gender snares myself, and I hope they are relevant.

I think there is such a thing as "toxic masculinity", but I believe that men are also victims.

“Masculinity" is almost entirely ideology, not biology. It's about how men should act ... what they should do. It seems to me it must be learned.

Femininity and" traditonal" female roles - being the mother, the wife, the one who stayed at home - did not need to be learned. Femininity just fucking happened to you. And given the freedoms that us first world women now enjoy, femininity seems almost like a natural toxin,. No effort required. Yet, well ...

Whether you want to be a mother or not, your body decides to rock and roll … you start menstruating. Some women may diasagree, but somehow you lose your bold, jocular childhood confidence.

Menstruation is just the start. No-one really tells you how to have an orgasm, for example. Onanism is not quite so straight forward for girls. You read Cleo, youfind your clitoris, you fool around ... then you think, oh God, if anyone saw me (teenage girls are always getting looked at - whether pretty or plain - you are getting assessed. I wasn't pretty. Boys felt entitled to casually call me an "ugly cunt". That's when I went punk ... the vomiting noises and the comments on what a dog I was didn't bother me once I actively decided to go weird.

Anyway, moving on. You start having sex. I didn't have anything approaching an orgasm ever from penetrative sex. Some women can ... I'm not one of them. My boyfriend was wonderful ... I adored him... he adored me ... but he was unhappy. WHY wasn't I having orgasms when we fucked? Enter the faked orgasm ...

What it must be like, to be a man! I don’t suffer from gender dysphoria, by the way – I’ve always accepted my fate, but to be honest I so often wonder what I might have done, had I been a man…

NOT having to spend 30 to 40 years dealing constant barrages of blood and discharge and all sorts pain, ranging from “some discomfort” to crippling agony .

NOT having to worry about getting pregnant, and of course

NOT being pregnant at all

NOT spending months with strange big painful breasts

NOT and being about twice your normal size for months on end

NOT having to waddle around on burningly sore swollen feet

NOT having your body marred by ugly purple stretch marks

NOT having to go through “labour” (what a euphemism that word is – given the absolutely unbelievable PAIN, which makes your moan and scream and plead in animal terror )

NOT having to bleed for weeks afterward from your torn vagina and NOT having to breast feed for months or years …

NOT having to give up sleeping …

I remember the uncontracepted mothers from my Catholic schools. Thirty years old - with six, eight, ten (in one case THIRTEEN) children.

Thirty years old looks like youth these days. By 21st century standards, these young women could've passed for 50 years old.

I know what youre' thinking don't blame biology: blame the Catholic church .... but there was no cheap safe effective contraception for ANY women until the 1960s.

I give thanks to science - largely a masculine province - for making it possible for women to avoid being raped and laid waste by their biology.

Okay, to men ...
I am not an anthropologist but I imagine the notions we still have concerning what is naturally "masculine' do have some basis in biology and physiology.
 
Last edited:
Hey I am glad I spotted this post ... was just musing about certain gender snares myself, and I hope they are relevant.

I think there is such a thing as "toxic masculinity", but I believe that men are also victims.

“Masculinity" is almost entirely ideology, not biology. It's about how men should act ... what they should do. It seems to me it must be
learned.
BUT FEMININITY IS NATURALLY TOXIC...
Femininity and" traditonal" female roles - being the mother, the wife, the one who stayed at home - did not need to be learned. Femininity just fucking happened to you.

Whether you want to be a mother or not, your body decides to rock and roll … you start menstruating. Some women may diasagree, but somehow you lose your bold, jocular childhood confidence.

Menstruation is just the start. No-one really tells you how to have an orgasm, for example. Onanism is not quite so straight forward for girls. You read Cleo, youfind your clitoris, you fool around ... then you think, oh God, if anyone saw me (teenage girls are always getting looked at - whether pretty or plain - you are getting assessed. I wasn't pretty. Boys felt entitled to casually call me an "ugly cunt"....)

Anyway, moving on. You start having sex. YOU'RE MEANT TO LIKE IT but it's impossible to feel entirely free of worry about getting pregnant.
Despite contraception, many women get pregnant anyway .., I didn't get pregnant by choice myself ...
THEN THERE'S THE PLEASURE PROBLEM ...

I didn't have anything approaching an orgasm ever from penetrative sex. Some women can ... I'm not one of them. My boyfriend was wonderful ... I adored him... he adored me ... but he was unhappy. WHY wasn't I having orgasms when we fucked? Enter the faked orgasm ...

What it must be like, to be a man! I don’t suffer from gender dysphoria, by the way – I’ve always accepted my fate, but to be honest I so often wonder what I might have done, had I been a man…

NOT having to spend 30 to 40 years dealing constant barrages of blood and discharge and all sorts pain, ranging from “some discomfort” to crippling agony .

NOT having to worry about getting pregnant, and of course

NOT being pregnant at all

NOT spending months with strange big painful breasts

NOT and being about twice your normal size for months on end

NOT having to waddle around on burningly sore swollen feet

NOT having your body marred by ugly purple stretch marks

NOT having to go through “labour” (what a euphemism that word is – given the absolutely unbelievable PAIN, which makes your moan and scream and plead in animal terror )

NOT having to bleed for weeks afterward from your torn vagina and NOT having to breast feed for months or years …

NOT having to give up sleeping …

I remember the uncontracepted mothers from my Catholic schools. Thirty years old - with six, eight, ten (in one case THIRTEEN) children.

Thirty years old looks like youth these days. By 21st century standards, these young women could've passed for 50 years old.

I know what youre' thinking don't blame biology: blame the Catholic church .... but there was no cheap safe effective contraception for ANY women until the 1960s.

I give thanks to science - largely a masculine province - for making it possible for women to avoid being raped and laid waste by their biology.

Okay, to men ...
I am not an anthropologist but I imagine the notions we still have concerning what is naturally "masculine' do have some basis in biology and physiology.
PS shit I am writing a fucking thesis here ... but in "25 words or less" .... men no longer have to race around hunting and gathering ... women can be "doers", we can have careers, we have choices ... we're not pregnant all the time, chained to a kitchen sink, and dying nearly as often as we used to from childbirth complications.

The contemporary female "role" - at least in Western. secular countries, is nowhere near as rigid, as prescibed, as stereotypifying, as the male role.

Supposedly no-one will take me to task if I am "unladylike", if I sleep around, if I assert myself , if I speak a lot, if I speak loudly ... etcera ....

Men pay a sort of lip service to all this new female liberty ... but how hard it must be, how threatening ....and why so?

Not necessarily because of male "entitlement", although there's some of that. But surely there's also a genuine injustice at large -

Because what is expected of men is "masculinity", and masculinity has barely evolved an iota for centuries.

Men are still despised if they cry. Men are despised if they sucuumb to distress. Men are despised if they let feelings interfere with their mission. Their mission is supposedly action, action, doing doing ... it's naturalised, but it aint natural.

Boys are still expected to be blase about literally get killed in action, if their elders, the patriarchs, presidents and so forth, decide to stage a war.

Whenever I watch films about trench warfare during WW1 or read military history ... I just can't help but fucking marvel at the fact that these sane young boys, who must have been absolutely shit scared ... not to mention the irresistable, repitilian instinct that every animal on the planet possesses ... with every neuron and nerve in their bodies SCREAMING to RUN THE OTHER WAY ... practically none of these boys failed to go over the fucking top.

It's meant to be "natural" for men to have courage and strength and so forth ... but such things are completely against all nature....

Oh shit. More than 25 words. Got to get on with the marking....

Final thought though: when men feel they can't live up to this insane standard of hardness they feel shame, which is the most primal, most dangeous, most dreadful emotion possible. Guilt is easy in comparison. I read once that "we feel guilt for what we've done: but we feel shame for what we are.

People close to me, including my mother, have committed suicide. And it was shame that made them do it.

Men kill themselves more often than women, especially young men.


Masculinity is toxic. It needs to be superannuated the fuck out of the scene.


 
Last edited:
MrsGamp said:
Masculinity is toxic.
MrsGamp said:
FEMININITY IS NATURALLY TOXIC.

Some men rape bodies.
Some women rape minds.

Neither masculinity or femininity are toxic.
Genders aren't toxic. Races aren't toxic. Sharks aren't toxic.

This guy is toxic:

toxic-avenger.jpg
 
Well, in the context of our current nuclear, women are still largely left to it by men when it comes to the most physically taxing part ofthe having children - the terrifying exhausting and also, frankly, often tedious five years or so before the child can talk properly, be reasoned with, and left alone for long enough for Mum to at least use the toilet on her own

Post-natal depression, I am convinced, is usually the result of the INSANE sleep deprivation new mothers in nuclear families must contend with.

If men were permitted to stay at home too and really help this might change.

Failing that, if it was considered alright to have one's mother or sisters come to help out, even for two or three months until the new mother had recovered from her confinement, it might help.

But we privilege the sanctity of the "the relationship" above everything in our nuclear family model ... and mothers and babies pay very dearly,.
 
Top