Jabberwocky
Frumious Bandersnatch
I've noticed that a lot of people here believe in weed as a cure-all and recommend it in all types of situations - especially for coming down from or withdrawing from just about anything else. However, given that this is a harm reduction forum and there is a large amount of scientific literature on the harmful effects of weed especially on younger people and people with a predisposition to mental illness, I'm wondering whether the advice to have some weed for whatever your problem is is actually responsible and ethical advice.
For example, people would go mental if anyone recommended meth as way to get over your benzo / opiate habit, but recommending weed to a young person might be equally dangerous vis a vis possible psychosis and other problems.
I write this as a former smoker who attributes his adult psychiatric problems to overdoing weed as a teenager. I know there are a lot of weed lovers out there but let's not make this an ideological discussion....points for scientific references...
(There's probably an equivalent post on the ethics of harm reduction for the people keen to recommend their preferred psychadelic/disosiative/ empathogen as the correct cure for everything).
For example, people would go mental if anyone recommended meth as way to get over your benzo / opiate habit, but recommending weed to a young person might be equally dangerous vis a vis possible psychosis and other problems.
I write this as a former smoker who attributes his adult psychiatric problems to overdoing weed as a teenager. I know there are a lot of weed lovers out there but let's not make this an ideological discussion....points for scientific references...
(There's probably an equivalent post on the ethics of harm reduction for the people keen to recommend their preferred psychadelic/disosiative/ empathogen as the correct cure for everything).