No I was looking at swine flu, which is what I assume you were talking about cause I assume you're not saying Spanish flu was nothing.
Also something doesn't make sense here.
CDC numbers were one of the ones I relied on in forming my original reply.
I dunno what to tell you about your specific link, but I recommend you look into the number of people swine flu potentially infected and how many died.
Particularly how many died because by that measure alone we can already easily see that covid19 is significantly worse.
I have found a couple different numbers, one appears to be based on total confirmed cases and deaths, the other is an estimated actual cases and deaths resulting from a CDC study.
Using the numbers from either results in a fatality rate well under 1%. The numbers in the enclosed link from the CDC do, so God knows why another CDC link says something else.
One thing is for sure though, it's been a couple months and at least 150,000 are dead, probably more because of how much of the reporting is limited to hospital cases.
And that is way way more than there were in similar recent pandemics in similar time frames.
A summary of key events of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and the CDC's response activities between April 2009 and April 2010.
www.cdc.gov
And it being more infectious isn't really here nor there. Sure more infected with the same death count means lower case fatality ratio. But it's still waaay more people dying than normal.