JessFR
Bluelight Crew
CFR for ordinary coronaviruses, the ordinary human ones that cause the common cold is up to 6% in certain circumstances.
In certain circumstances? Wtf is that supposed to mean.
CFR for ordinary coronaviruses, the ordinary human ones that cause the common cold is up to 6% in certain circumstances.
Except it was ALSO widely reported at the time that those numbers would likely change as time went on.
That people don't pay any notice to that disclaimer is their fault. It's the unavoidable consequence of data taking a while to become more accurate.
We really don't seem to know just yet what the true mortality rate is. Or more accurately, there probably isn't one because your mortality rate is dependent on various factors, probably including the state of the health care you get. Hence the numbers being all over the place.
All that matters is, was there good reason to believe it was substantially more deadly than the common flu? Yes. Is there still? Yes.
I'm not saying it's less deadly than the flu. Someone else said that.
What I'm saying is the media looks at the data, picks the highest estimate possible because scaring people gets clicks and makes revenue, and they run with it.
The people who trust the MSM are fed these exaggerations and fabrications of doom and gloom because they trust things if they're on TV. This is ignorant, yes, but that doesn't absolve the MSM of blame for exploiting that ignorance to generate fear just so they can make more money.
If the media actually reported the truth with no sensationalism they'd sell fewer papers, get fewer clicks, and make less money. Can't have that now can we?
You know, I believe there is a bad virus out there that does kill people but I cannot shake the feeling in my very DNA and soul that tells me something else is going on here.
We need to figure out what that “something else” is and quickly.
Our freedoms and Liberty are being taken away day by day.
We will soon be in a position where there is no return.
indeed Jess Indeed0.66% mortality is NOT less than the flu. It's substantially higher.
God this thread is a cesspool of bullshit.
like in vulnerable populations, don't be facetious Jess, you know full fucking well what that means. it means it is not a general case, the statement has limited universality and is accurate within certain bounds, Stop playing games it is very tiresome.In certain circumstances? Wtf is that supposed to mean.
Well I can't attest to what the abstract concept of "the mainstream media" said. I can say that I personally don't recall seeing any news articles about the 2-4% mortality rate that didn't also explain that that was based on the current numbers that were likely inaccurate, and didn't include remarks that in time they'd likely drop.
So I certainly don't feel mislead in that regard, but perhaps I'm not getting my news from the same sources.
Five seconds on DDG...
![]()
The latest coronavirus death rate is 3.4% — higher than earlier figures. Older patients face the highest risk.
Experts have predicted that the fatality rate of the disease will decrease as the number of confirmed cases continues to rise.www.businessinsider.com
![]()
China's coronavirus could have same death rate as Spanish flu outbreak in the UK
The Spanish flu pandemic of 1918 was “the deadliest in history”, infecting around 500m worldwide and killing 20-to-50m.uk.style.yahoo.com
![]()
15 MILLION people 'will die in best-case coronavirus scenario'
In the most disastrous scenario, the death toll could reach a staggering 68million including hundreds of thousands of deaths in Britain and the United States (file photo).www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
Chilling coronavirus chart shows UK death rate is outpacing every country including Italy
THE coronavirus death rate in the UK is outstripping every other country suffering from the pandemic at the same stage, including Italy, where patients died at a rate of one every two minutes over the weekend.www.express.co.uk
The death rate from the seasonal flu is 0.02%, not 0.1%.Correct it's higher than the seasonal flu which is 0.1%
Nobody is inflating COVID death counts by including patients who died of other causes. Autopsies are more reliable than diagnoses in almost every situation.the death rate that is easy to measure is the CFR however the CFR is increased by catching and throwing in died with not of COVD-19.
Meanwhile, in real life, mortality rates decrease during recessions.More people will die from the damage being done to the economy than the virus itself. Calling it now.
This has gotta be the funniest bullshit I've seen in a while. The entire world economy is run on models. Ever heard of the Black-Scholes equation? If "models" weren't reliable things would have fallen apart a long, long time ago.We've crippled the world economy based on MODELS.
The simple explanation that Germany has tested a higher fraction of infected than Italy has, of course, must be ignored, because it wouldn't allow you to feel like you're smarter than the experts.there is no chance that the flavor of COVID-19 circulating in Italy is 5 times more lethal than the virus circulating in Germany. ZERO chance, so you have to think harder what these numbers mean.
Right yeah, I don't read news from sensationalist tabloids.
Although strictly speaking your first link includes the kinda disclaimer I've seen.
"Though the latest numbers mark an increase in mortality, experts have predicted that the fatality rate of COVID-19 could decrease as the number of confirmed cases rises"
That's the kinda remark I was talking about that I've seen in lots of places.
But not all mainstream media is all the worst of sensationalist crap.
It's about what gets the most hits though as I've been saying.
If you look you can find more sensible coverage - although the FT's graphs were exaggerated to all hell too and they're certainly not a tabloid - but what gets more hits? Outrage porn.
The Daily Mail is the most popular newspaper in the UK and the Mail Online got about 200 million monthly unique hits as of 2014, which I'm sure is only higher now, and is very popular worldwide including the US and Australia.
It's also notorious for fake news and scaremongering. But it is still ridiculously popular.
It proves my point, that the coverage which gets the most attention is sensationalist at best and downright false at worst. That's what people read and share. So it's what the biggest media outlets in the world largely pump out.
Appealing to the lowest common denominator is a good business strategy. Tabloids do this very well.
Should I be surprised that you didn't read the articles you posted? From your link:Five seconds on DDG...Well I can't attest to what the abstract concept of "the mainstream media" said. I can say that I personally don't recall seeing any news articles about the 2-4% mortality rate that didn't also explain that that was based on the current numbers that were likely inaccurate, and didn't include remarks that in time they'd likely drop.
![]()
The latest coronavirus death rate is 3.4% — higher than earlier figures. Older patients face the highest risk.
Experts have predicted that the fatality rate of the disease will decrease as the number of confirmed cases continues to rise.www.businessinsider.com
The death rate from the seasonal flu is 0.02%, not 0.1%.
Meanwhile, in real life, mortality rates decrease during recessions.
Should I be surprised that you didn't read the articles you posted? From your link:
"The death rate is likely to change further as more cases are confirmed, though experts predict that the percentage of deaths will decrease in the longer term since milder cases of COVID-19 are probably going undiagnosed. "
Roughly the level of intellectual honesty I've learned to expect from conspiracy theorists.
Well yeah that's probably true. But if you deliberately look for shit news, you'll get shit news. The existence of shit news doesn't mean though that all news coverage is shit. Or at least not equally shit.
The point in making is that there obviously is media, and personally I'd argue it's part of the mainstream, that isn't nearly as exclusively sensationalist crap.
Bullshit, ILI concurrent covid, cardio concurrent covid = COD COVID 19 paths are doing this right now in the real world. Wake the fuck up.The death rate from the seasonal flu is 0.02%, not 0.1%.
Nobody is inflating COVID death counts by including patients who died of other causes. Autopsies are more reliable than diagnoses in almost every situation.
you do know the story of LTCM, an model based company...Meanwhile, in real life, mortality rates decrease during recessions.
This has gotta be the funniest bullshit I've seen in a while. The entire world economy is run on models. Ever heard of the Black-Scholes equation? If "models" weren't reliable things would have fallen apart a long, long time ago.
OK way to totally miss the point. which is the raw numbers are meaningless without knowing what those numbers mean.The simple explanation that Germany has tested a higher fraction of infected than Italy has, of course, must be ignored, because it wouldn't allow you to feel like you're smarter than the experts.
Could you post %ages?0.66% mortality is NOT less than the flu. It's substantially higher.
God this thread is a cesspool of bullshit.
You know, I believe there is a bad virus out there that does kill people but I cannot shake the feeling in my very DNA and soul that tells me something else is going on here.
We need to figure out what that “something else” is and quickly.
Our freedoms and Liberty are being taken away day by day.
We will soon be in a position where there is no return.
I don't know how much international news the rest of y'all read on a regular basis, but I tend to go through papers/sites from a whole load of countries around the world. And the lead stories in pretty much all of them are roughly the same: national leaders failing to respond quickly enough, a lack of PPE for health workers and face masks for the populace, a terrifying shortage of desperately needed ventilators, and massive contention and discontent about which scientific advice to follow or the validity/wisdom/folly of temporarily suspending national economies for the sake of social distancing, self-isolation and "flattening the curve".
Which is not to excuse any of the stupidity and shortsightedness that's being uncovered along the way, but does suggest that the issue is perhaps a little more systemic and fundamental to broader international economic and political structures than the behaviour individual personalities within it (much though I may loathe to admit it myself...)