nuttynutskin
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Messages
- 10,736
I've done a lot of research on this. There are two aspects to this to differentiate: developmental and metabolic. Developmental status covers things like bone density, lung capacity, and oxygen metabolism. Those things are determined during puberty and into early adulthood. If a person is developmentally male, they will have more physical advantage than developmental females, for the most part. Males have more density, more innate musculature, larger lung capacity. If someone is developmentally male and they complete their growth, then switching to female hormones will not affect their innate capacities. Estrogen in particular is pro-matrix forming in the bones (and why women get osteoporosis in middle age when estrogen tapers off). A male that is 6'4" who becomes female will still remain 6'4". He/she will have a longer stride for running, larger lungs for swimming, longer arms and muscles for throwing, etc. That will never change.
Then there is the metabolic aspect. This is determined by hormone status, fitness status, nutrition status, etc. A person who sits on the couch all day is not going to have the same metabolic status as someone who trains daily, regardless of their sex.
You can enhance metabolic status, you can't change developmental status. And this is the reason why most MTF trans are outperforming females in the women's category. They have more developmental advantages. We see this over and over with biological males coming out on top in women's sports.
The grey area you're alluding to is the biological males who started hormone therapy before or during puberty, like hormone blockers, etc. Their advantages may be less clear because they are more developmentally female than the group I mentioned above.
If someone like Caitlin Jenner competed in the women's category, she would clean house, and that would be unfair.
The first group, IMO, should not be treated just like women. They are not the same as other women. What they choose to call themselves is irrelevant because they have developmental advantages. We all know it, we all see it, yet we're supposed to pretend we don't and just call them women like any other female athlete. Cognitive dissonance at its finest. I won't subscribe to it.
Exactly... People seem to think it's just about hormones and forget or ignore the developmental status. I was gonna say something about that earlier but you articulated it a lot better than I would've. lol