Now we need to fear the LGBT community because pedophiles, eh?
The LGBT community need to fear the pedophiles.
"Oh I have no problem with them, but they need to make sure to ward against the pedophile incursion"
Yes, exactly.
"I can't stand the LGBT community because they didn't stop the pedophile incursion"
Hopefully it doesn't come to this. I have faith that enough people in the "community" (it's not even really a community) will pushback against this.
Sounds familiar to why we need to fear immigrants... because sex trafficking/rape.
^I see this constantly. Conflating immigration with illegal (undocumented) "immigration". They are completely separate. We should fear sex trafficking/rape from groups of random people easily traversing a border where we cannot keep track of who enters. Legal immigration doesn't have this problem because we can vet and track people. Then there are completely separate issues relating to unrestricted legal immigration.
As to attacks against white men... give me a fucking break. Attempts by women and minorities to equalize the power imbalance that has existed for a long fucking time (and until recently the imbalance was unquestioned and extreme) is not an attack on white people.
Big presuppositions there. Let's just say that grouping people together and judging them by their skin color is not conducive and many would say racist. Also it's not white men specifically, it's also white children (see Covington), white women..
I get that maybe things aren't quite as rosy for you as they were before, yeah me either.
Did you just assume my race? lol. I'm Jewish and whether I count as "white" is up for dispute. I wouldn't be accepted at a white supremacist rally, but I can differentiate between white pride and white supremacy. I will speak up and defend any race that is being persecuted, which includes whites.
The difference is I don't think I deserved to have advantages over other people based on the simple fact of how I was born.
Yeah well you know who has advantages? Tall people - they get paid more. Should they cut off their legs? Or how about good-looking people? They get paid more, they are more accepted (regardless of race), should they acid their faces or feel ashamed in general for winning the genetic lottery? I find the whole basis to this ideology flawed and counterproductive. In our society a beautiful black woman is more privileged than a butt-ugly white male. And one thing I will say if there's any legit privileges, the upper hand is in favor of Jewish people not white people.
Calling the attempt to remove white and/or male privilege a "genocide" makes mock of the actual genocides that have occurred.
I would never call it a genocide. But the term "war" is much looser. You can say that there is a war against white men (although I would say there are 2 separates wars, against white people and all men in general).
No, we're just leveling the playing field.
The issue is that instead of lifting people up, we're doing that by taking others down. Others who may have never done anything wrong, simply for the actions of people a long time ago, and based on their skin color. That's racist discrimination.
So you don't think bring born a white person in this country gives you some automatic advantages, and has since it was created?
Being born the dominant race in any country will give you advantages. Mixed race Japanese people are looked down upon in Japan for eg, it happens to different degrees for different reasons all over the world. And we need to stop living in the past too and appreciate what we've created today, a relatively equal society. The most successful demographics in the USA currently are East Asian-Americans and Indian-Americans. That is not a result of a white supremacist country, I'm sorry. Also I'm going to mention again the amount of power Jewish people have in the US relative to their population %. But if you wish to consider them "white" then that will support your narrative (though they personally would not, unless politically expedient).
I can get pulled over for a traffic violation and never once think the cop might hurt me.
Far more white people than black are killed by police, and in respect to proportionality <that's the case in NYC at least. I heard someone explain it like: if a cop kills a black person, the potential backlash and outcry is so extreme that police will restrain themselves (as they should do anyway). But if they shoot a white man, nobody really cares it's just another white person (I guess this is part of leveling the playing field?)
I can enjoy full consideration for any job and not be immediately passed on some of them for my race (or gender).
Some places you wouldn't get considered unless you were Asian. Or Jewish. There's no white supremacy, but what people do do sometimes is stereotype or profile other groups (unfortunately) based on repeated patterns of behavior. This white supremacy myth drives me mad though.
I could care less if we roll back the age of consent a bit. 18 always seemed a bit "old" for "adulthood" IMO, especially with people going through puberty at 12, etc these days. 16 seems rational to me.
I'm not talking about ephebophilia, I'm referring to prepubescent children. They're teaching LGBT sex education now to children in kindergarten. I'm not in favor for teaching them anything sexual, even cis-gendered heteronormative sexual themes. It's a slippery slope and many can see the writing on the wall. The MSM has published multiple pedo-friendly or pedo-apologist pieces, and I've seen other articles talking about how little kids understand the concept of consent. Then there's the whole trans-age/identifying as a little child. Together it's a recipe for disaster. I may be (hopefully) completely wrong but just be aware of it. There's already some pretty reprehensible stuff going on, like parents brainwashing their very young children into thinking they're trans, or allowing pre-pubescent children to get on hormone blockers when they really should be allowed time to reach sexual and emotional maturity.
The LGBT community isn't a community.
Yeah I wrote that above before I read this and I agree. I was recently watching an interview with a lesbian who was hammering this point home because she disagreed that trans women were women. This little schism between intersectional feminists and TERFs is pretty interesting. But I'm concerned that the "pedo activists" are going to subtly insert themselves into this community/agenda/movement/whatever you wish to call it. I was even told back in 2016 that they planned to introduce a "P" into the acronym to refer to "Pedosexuals", a friendlier term. Then less than a year later the P appeared officially - to refer to Pansexuals (which to me is basically bisexual). I remember seeing another "P" also but I forgot what it referred to. Check out the increased number of explicit themes in media for young kids, the "drag kid" phenomenon with children like Desmond is Amazing and Lactatia.
cduggles said:
I don't think the Sandmann case is the hill I'd die on for this issue.
Covington was a big deal because it was so public and exposed so blatantly how vicious the MSM can be. Reporters didn't do their jobs, people actively denied video evidence, and many called for violence against these children. Doxxing, punching, school shooting, a Disney producer even tweeted a photo of throwing a white MAGA cap-wearing child into a wood chipper. The response was literally insane and the media outlets responsible DO deserve to be sued. We cannot treat innocent people that way, even if they are white and support POTUS.
