N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet
I'd be interested in evaluating an azido (Nsub3) group in place of the main ring system chlorine. I've seen nitro. Another EWG that is of interest to me is CFsub3. I'm sure they've all been made & evaluated. Too potent or toxic?
Organic azides do not tend to be the most stable compounds, to the point where inorganic azide salts and low-molecular weight organic azides tend to be shock-sensitive explosives.... not to mention azide salts as well as several organic azides being fairly toxic.
Trifluoromethyl groups shouldn't pose any such problem. I know of trifluoromethyl analogues of nordazepam (triflunordazepam) and clobazam (triflubazam), but these never saw market adoption, probably because you'd only see a modest increase in potency at best, while requiring a harder to obtain precursor.
Interestingly, benzos containing a trifluoroethyl group on the 1-nitrogen atom did see pharmaceutical use. One of these is halazepam (N-fluoroethyl-nordazepam), which was quickly withdrawn from the US market again because it didn't sell, however. The other and much more interesting one is quazepam. Quazepam and its metabolite 2-oxoquazepam apparently exhibit much higher selectivity for the sleep-inducing subunits of the GABA receptor than other benzos, similar to the z-drugs zolpidem and zaleplon.
Anyone had any first-hand experience with [atomoxetine]?
I once took 80mg and it made me feel like I'd been hit by a truck while simultaneously having the flu. In retrospect it's probably a massive overdose but I was young and dumb...
According to the book QD 1 A355 no. 45 p. 117,
![]()
MP-809
Is "particularly effective in the treatment of neurotic depressions" and "is only a weak MAOI."