• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The 2018 Trump Presidency thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
There was only one phototographer who took that famous photo of Trumps empty inauguration and he said it was taken at 11:04 am around the same time as Obamas inauguration pics at 11:30 am. I just watched something about this 2 wks ago.

Even the stands at his parade were empty. You can't lie and say that was before the parade started because the parade was in full swing when the pics were taken. His parade was so weak it was sad to watch but funny as fuck.

FUCK TRUMP 2020
 
Last edited:
There was only one phototographer who took that famous photo of Trumps empty inauguration and he said it was taken at 11:04 am around the same time as Obamas inauguration pics at 11:30 am. I just watched something about this 2 wks ago.

Even the stands at his parade were empty. You can't lie and say that was before the parade started because the parade was in full swing when the pics were taken. His parade was so weak it was sad to watch but funny as fuck.

FUCK TRUMP 2020

Yeah it was like that second iteration of Unite the Right where only four national socialists showed up, all hiding their faces and afraid to talk to CNN reporters out of fear they would lose their Chik Fil A jobs.
 
and it didn't stop trump from asking for the photos to be edited to make the crowd look bigger.
I'd like to see your source for this. MSM via anonymous sources?

The bigger point is that if we're arguing about inauguration crowd sizes still to this day instead of Trump waging bloody regime changes then I am pleased.
Still early days of course and while NK seems like a win, Iran is still a big issue.
But this kind of stuff is just so inconsequential and a lot of it is sensationalized bullshit by a dishonest media, weaponized against the administration by the intelligence agencies.

Newt Gingrich said:
I have been writing a lot about the power of a big-choice election in November.

This week, Texas Republicans won a special election for a state Senate seat in a district along the Mexican border. Every Republican campaign in the country should study this race carefully.

You may not have read about this GOP victory, because the liberal national media is not exactly excited to report that Republicans reclaimed a seat they had not held in 139 years. The liberal media is especially shy about reporting on a Republican victory in a district that Hillary Clinton carried by nearly 12 points in the 2016 presidential election.

From the left's standpoint, this victory is even more frightening because the district is 73 percent African-American and Hispanic.

Furthermore, at a time when people are touting gigantic Democratic voter turnout and lagging Republican participation, this special election runoff had twice as many voters as the last Texas state Senate special election runoff in February 2015.

In fact, the turnout for this race went up from 26,207 in the first round of the election to 44,487 in the runoff, according to Sam Taylor with the Texas Secretary of State?s Office. The Republican candidate received 23,576 votes to the Democrat?s 20,911.


This Blue Wave might turn out to be a Red Tsunami.
 
NK seems like a win, Iran is still a big issue.

You're insane. NK is the HUGE fumble; many different administrations should have nuked them back to the stone ages; Bush and Clinton and now Trump are fumbling majorly on this, and I could count other administrations going back as well. Iran is slowly crumbling; their regime is falling apart, the people are panicking, their money is becoming worthless as it should be. What are you on? Like seriously, please tell me what drugs you take. It must be some good stuff.
 
I'd like to see your source for this. MSM via anonymous sources?
nice assumption but incorrect. i already included a link but maybe you missed it.

the source was the uk guardian who established what happened from trump administration documents they obtained based on a freedom of information act request.

alasdair
 
nice assumption but incorrect. i already included a link but maybe you missed it.

the source was the uk guardian who established what happened from trump administration documents they obtained based on a freedom of information act request.

That's nice, I'd still like to see it. Should be publicly available.

Captain - you need to calm down. I don't quite believe it either but it may be possible to de-escalate situations peacefully.
 
You're insane. NK is the HUGE fumble; many different administrations should have nuked them back to the stone ages; Bush and Clinton and now Trump are fumbling majorly on this, and I could count other administrations going back as well.

You've advocated nuclear war with NK many times without once explaining how that would be a good thing. I'll take some extraordinary convincing before I agree with unleashing nuclear weapons against a third world nation. How doea this really benefit anyone?

It seems like you still think the US is the global cop :|
 
Sometimes the right thing isn’t easy and it’s going to cost a lot of lives.

Or we can wait a while so the death count only moves up, seems pointless.

the Kim regime will go on indefinitely. If we would have gotten involved in WWII earlier we could have saved Russia, prevented a lot of misery.

Just think about the untold horrors that are now going to unfold because we sat around and did nothing. Inaction is getting harder and harder to defend as we move forward in time.
 
Last edited:
considering how well vietnam turned out and resentful japan is; don't you think moving in wearing black pajamas style would be more appropriate then nuking a bunch of repressed citizens and painting a target on our back?

(scorched earth is easier to deal with i know, just looking from a humanitarian p.o.v.; N. korean citizens might show some appreciation for it even with trump in office 8o)
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I agree with General McArthur's sentiment on the matter near the end of the 'war'. He wanted to nuke the China/Korea border into oblivion so they couldn't receive aid from China again for decades. The war would have ended right then and there.

Of course, that's a bit extreme. I just admire the man's gall, and his devotion to a complete and total victory.
 
Sometimes the right thing isn’t easy and it’s going to cost a lot of lives.

Or we can wait a while so the death count only moves up, seems pointless.

North koreans probably use the same logic (or lack thereof, frankly) in saying why they should nuke LA and washington.
Think of how many lives would be saved. Seriously.
How many million innocent people have been killed by the USA in the 21st century alone?

Captain.Heroin said:
the Kim regime will go on indefinitely. If we would have gotten involved in WWII earlier we could have saved Russia, prevented a lot of misery.

Just think about the untold horrors that are now going to unfold because we sat around and did nothing. Inaction is getting harder and harder to defend as we move forward in time.

It's exactly the same mentality people always use to justify mass slaughter of innocents.

American lives are worth no more than north korean lives.
 
Sometimes the right thing isn’t easy and it’s going to cost a lot of lives.

Or we can wait a while so the death count only moves up, seems pointless.

the Kim regime will go on indefinitely. If we would have gotten involved in WWII earlier we could have saved Russia, prevented a lot of misery.

Just think about the untold horrors that are now going to unfold because we sat around and did nothing. Inaction is getting harder and harder to defend as we move forward in time.
it's pretty easy to consider nuking millions of people "the right thing to do" when your ass is at safety in sunny california, isn't it?
 
North koreans probably use the same logic (or lack thereof, frankly) in saying why they should nuke LA and washington.
Think of how many lives would be saved. Seriously.
How many million innocent people have been killed by the USA in the 21st century alone?



It's exactly the same mentality people always use to justify mass slaughter of innocents.

American lives are worth no more than north korean lives.

We've got a communist (Anarcho-Communism is not possible, you can't control the means of production without threat and use of violence, and the Anarcho-Communist idea seems to be violence is good as long as the perpetrators don't have a title/political office) against the mass slaughter of innocents.
 
^ weak sauce heaped on weak tits.

not to mention shades of trump.

at least when a communist does something it's accountable and expected. run and hide from the truth by rattling cages and contributing nothing of significance. <--- is this treezy z, JGrimez or trump i'm referencing... hard to tell.

donald trump quote from las vegas: "Today's Democrat Party is held hostage by left-wing haters, angry mobs, socialist fanatics, 'deep-state' bureaucrats, and their fake news allies."

very inspirational mr president. thanks for being such a great influence to children and teenagers all over this great nation.

on more news: Trump's Friday tweet likely staves off a confrontation between the president and his own intelligence officials, who have publicly and privately warned of the dangers of revealing classified intelligence. Democrats have attacked the initial decision to release the documents as reckless, arguing it could endanger international intelligence partnerships and sources. Trump told the Hill in an interview earlier this week that he had decided to release the documents in part at the urging of conservative Fox News TV hosts.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/21/trump-russia-documents-carter-page-comey-834665
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top