• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Mass Shootings and Gun Debate 2018 Thread

I don't really need a an argument when it comes to gun rights.

It's reference the constitution the law of the land. Revision to it might make u a tyrant.
 
Right but just in general changing the constitution could make u a tyrant especially as beautiful as it is now

Could you please stop talking like an adolescent, if you're going to contribute to CEP?

If not, we'll make correct grammar and spelling part of the rules. And I'll be proud to infract you.

You make perfectly good, law abiding, gun toting citizens look like morons. Please stop.
 
^ But you dont have any power on CEP therefore could be in breach of rules yourself and have your modgun taken away.


:(
 
^ ^Snobbery is so passe my dear. Its supposed to be fun. Its in the guidelines. Maybe ammend that bit and you will get your wish.

;)
 
Last edited:
In a constitutional republic wanting to change the constitution on which the republic is founded on is a sign of tyranny.

That's all
 
I said something similar to this to you recently, but I'm gonna rephrase it and say it again.

If you're gonna argue with someone who believes in something you disagree with, do it with someone who at least argues it well.

And in case that's not clear enough, no, arguing that you shouldn't change a constitution to remove passages that weren't even there to start with is not an example of a good argument.

Especially since even if you argue that the bill of rights is early enough to be considered original, it was a while later before they got applied to all the states too. Originally the bill of rights only applied to the federal governments actions.
 
Top