the guardian said:Trump's bid for Sydney casino 30 years ago rejected due to 'mafia connections’
A bid by Donald Trump to build Sydney’s first casino was rejected 30 years ago after police expressed concerns about his links to the mafia.
News Corp revealed on Wednesday morning minutes of the New South Wales cabinet that show police had warned the state government against approving a 1986-87 bid by a Trump consortium to build and operate a casino in Darling Harbour.
Trump, in partnership with the Queensland construction company Kern, was one of four groups vying for the lucrative project. The NSW government dumped it from the process on 5 May 1987, along with two other bidders.
At the time, the state treasurer, Ken Booth, said he had received reports on the bids from the police board, the state’s Treasury, the Darling Harbour Authority, and an independent financial consultant.
“I wish to inform honourable members that in light of these reports the government has decided to eliminate three tenderers from further consideration,” Booth told the state parliament. “These are the HKMS consortium, the Federal-Sabemo consortium and the Kern-Trump consortium.”
The public was not told the substance of the NSW government’s concerns. Booth said the reports “contain confidential and commercially sensitive material” and refused to make them public.
Now, under rules that declassify NSW cabinet papers after 30 years, summaries of the various reports on the Kern/Trump bid have come to light.
The documents, obtained by News Corp, show the Kern/Trump group was one of three deemed “dangerous” by the police board. “Briefly stated, the Police Board considers that HKMS, Federal/Resorts/Sabemo, Kern/Trump, are unacceptable,” the summary of the police report said.
“Atlantic City would be a dubious model for Sydney and in our judgment, the Trump mafia connections should exclude the Kern/Trump consortium,” a summary of the police board’s report said.
The cabinet papers also show there were doubts about the viability of the Kern/Trump bid. A report prepared by the independent contractor, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, found the Kern/Trump bid was one of two that were “not financially viable”.
The report found that revenues for the casino were overstated. “The proposal is financially viable on the basis that the projected financial structure is reasonably based,” a summary said.
“However, projected casino revenue estimates are not soundly based and the quantum of the potential overstatement is so material that the tender is not financially viable. Also, the tender is not financially viable on the basis of expected returns to equity investors.”
The Darling Harbour Authority, which assessed the design of Trump’s proposed casino, was largely supportive. It described Kern/Trump casino design as “rich, attractive and well-integrated” and said it would have “strong public appeal”.
The casino control division also gave Kern/Trump “unqualified certification” for the running of a casino in NSW.
One of the chief critics of the proposed casino at the time was the Rev Fred Nile, who is still a sitting member of the NSW upper house.
When the government announced its rejection of the Kern/Trump bid, Nile described the process as a “disaster” and pushed for the NSW government to scrap the casino entirely.
Nile told Guardian Australia he had raised concerns about possible organised crime links with the planned casino. “We certainly wouldn’t have wanted any connection with organised crime,” he said.
“We talked about that and there was always problems – casinos attract prostitution and other things.”
He was also strongly opposed to it having poker machines. “Which upset [Kerry] Packer, because you make a lot of money from the poker machines,” he said. “We were able to get the government to pass the law that there would be no poker machines in the Crown casino.”
I didn't vote for trump, I live in the uk.
Trump did so well in elections because he is an overweight, insulting, sexist, self obsessed man so he got a lot in common with the average American. Lol
I said Americans not just trump voters.
More than two-thirds of men and almost six in 10 women are overweight or obese.
UK named as world's largest legal ivory exporter
Nice coverage of the spread, Mel22!
I'm curious if the support of white supremacists will waver or perish after his tepid denunciation of their ilk.
Any thoughts?
Not sure why you keep lying. White power is bad...mmkay. I have only defended free speech. Yes I'm Jewish so I don't like Nazis. I also speak 8 languages including 3 European languages 3 Asian languages and Hebrew. I honestly do not personally know anyone else that has more respect and admiration for other cultures than myself, and hey guess what that includes American culture (of where I am a citizen). None of that really matters though, people should be able to present their opinions here without being personally attacked or character assassinated.Liquid and others have expressed sympathy or admiration for the cause of US white nationalism, more than once, so I'm gonna call him and others nazi sympathizers or fascist apologists or some other combo. Liquid, as is his weird way, can't even say anything negative about a white power movement, once he's taken a position. And he's Jewish. Who knows.
Does that mean that you assumed what I was thinking and what I was gonna say, which is what you chided me for doing previously? Tsk tsk.totally called it.
Trump does not fuel hate. Your character assassination to advance your own agenda does.
One could argue that ignoring them and preventing them any "canvas to paint" would be effective and take as little effort as possible.
Notice how the media began it's campaign to paint Trump as a racist as soon as he started gaining traction during the election?
If anyone continues to think that Trump is a racist - I would honestly like to know specifically why.
They can see things however they want. They already see the world through their own shade-of-fucked glasses, doesn't make it right. I can see your point though, but I think that these sort of "monumental" moments actually help to empower them and nourish their growth even more.As sick and delusional as they are, they are clever and organised enough to always find something to paint regardless. They will feel the resistance weakening, and see it as a victory. I believe it would only serve to further empower them, and help their numbers grow.
fair.Even if we ignored them, do you think all those undercover hateful whackos who haven't yet grown the balls to show themselves would do the same? I doubt it.
The thing is if they spew it and no one is there to witness it then what does it gain them? If there is no media coverage, or at least less, what good is it to their cause? Safer? They already feel plenty safe, they are too dumb to know when they are in trouble.Safety in numbers is a thing here. I can't see how allowing them to feel even safer and spew their hate more freely could be anything other than a very bad fucking idea. I mean, nothing is certain, but allowing them to go forward with this shit unchallenged just feels like an unacceptably dangerous gamble at best.
true.Social consequences and strong resistance keeps a lot of these pussies quiet and in their place. I feel like it needs to be a priority to always make it crystal clear that there is no place for this shit in society, and as they scream louder, we must as well just to be heard.
And anyway, actually getting people to just ignore them is simply not realistic. This is violence. This is hurtful and scary. Expecting people not to react and resist when these psychos come marching through their community is just not gonna work. Too many people are just way too uncomfortable with this, and rightfully so.
tl;dr, but I caught this part and
fucking LOL.
That is all. Carry on.
I doubt it will even waver a little bit, let alone perish....this kind of hatred is complex and runs very deep. Trump didn't turn kind, balanced people into racist scum - these snivelling little pieces of trash just finally felt enough safety in numbers to crawl out of their ratholes a little. Unfortunately, a bunch of them managing to get into the WH is obviously helping this along in a big way.
mel22 said:Safety in numbers is a thing here. I can't see how allowing them to feel even safer and spew their hate more freely could be anything other than a very bad fucking idea. I mean, nothing is certain, but allowing them to go forward with this shit unchallenged just feels like an unacceptably dangerous gamble at best.
I support those that stand against them, and will do as much as I can to resist them each and every time they come anywhere near my fucking community.