♥ Lady Bug ♥
Ex-Bluelighter
Would you really be so callous as to discriminate against these unfortunate disabled people?
♥ Lady Bug ♥;14075883 said:Would you really be so callous as to discriminate against these unfortunate disabled people?
I dont think its callous to state that you wouldnt. Thats like saying its callous to say you dont find over weight people attractive. Honestly for myself, physical attraction wouldnt be there id be more likely to brush them off in a social area where there are other options. With sustained contact however, that would probably be subject to change. I dont think its insensitive to state that physical attraction take precedence in the likelihood one would approach a stranger to take a chance
I dont think its callous to state that you wouldnt. Thats like saying its callous to say you dont find over weight people attractive. Honestly for myself, physical attraction wouldnt be there id be more likely to brush them off in a social area where there are other options. With sustained contact however, that would probably be subject to change. I dont think its insensitive to state that physical attraction take precedence in the likelihood one would approach a stranger to take a chance
Yeah but what if someone with a disability like these is actually attractive?
Depends on you define attraction. I find the standard human form to be attractive; physically fit, symmetrical in a way... im assuming you just mean shes got a pretty face? There is more to it then that for me. You can call it shallow but face or body alone isnt enough its a whole package deal, i most likely wouldnt consider it, cant say for sure but thats how i feel on the matter.
Yeah I guess we judge physical attraction is diferent ways. A beutiful body and face and a nice personality could be enough to make me skip the no arms/legs part.