mydrugbuddy
Bluelighter
I think you just might enjoy it! :D
Watched the recent Star Wars earlier. Things wrong with it: Fin. And the fact that all not-Vaders have been shit and this one is no exception. Fin. Few other niggles but mostly alright. That fukkin' Fin better pick up in the next two though![]()
Just read there's a biopic of Miles Davis hitting the cinema screen. Honna have to check that out.
This reminds me I forgot all about that James Brown movie- will have to check that muthafucka out asap
Watched the recent Star Wars earlier. Things wrong with it: Fin. And the fact that all not-Vaders have been shit and this one is no exception. Fin. Few other niggles but mostly alright. That fukkin' Fin better pick up in the next two though![]()
I watched it only a couple of months ago, managing to avoid any spoilers in the meantime. I'd expected it to be brilliant from the reviews and hype but found it to be a bit shite! I still love Star Wars though, so I will consume any film they throw at me for the foreseeable future.
I watched the 2013 remake of Evil Dead on Film 4 the other night. It was really very good, a million times better than the 1981 original which seems laughable in comparison as it has dated so badly, but in the new film the overall quality, tension and action sequences were ratcheted up right from the start and sustained right the way through the film keeping you hooked on the edge of your seat throughout.
There are some slight variations in the plot, one of the group of friends plans to use the time spent miles from anywhere to quit unspecified drugs, and a lot of the first apparent siteings of the demons are initially rationalised away as some kind of drug withdrawal induced delerium. When the evil spirits get unwittingly summoned (Christ the guy reading "that book" aloud was one dumb fucker) and possesses its' hosts one by one this in particular is so much better done than the original, where the special effects were pretty much limited to insanely applied make-up, and those demon eyes and voice have also been improved upon. All the action sequences are way better too. They could have made an equally crap cheap and nasty remake, glad they made the effort to produce a decent film.
Just watched the remake myself and although I couldn't disagree more on the relative merits of the original (it's a classic for a reason) I would agree they did a great job with the remake. The fact that the producer, writer/director and star of the original are all involved in the new version would suggest that - as Sam Raimi himself has noted in interviews - it's probably closer to what he wanted to achieve back then but given it was his first film and basically thrown together (for just $10000 if memory serves) I don't think it's entirely fair to make direct comparisons as far as the technical side does. What made the original so good was the energy and relentless tension which was very original at the time - and this is just what the newer version achieves for audiences that have had 35 years of horror flicks inspired by the original Evil Dead to desensitise them to stuff that just wouldn't have been possible back then. The original is the original and it is a legend in its own lifetime, but the remake is a belter as such things go I would agree.
.