• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

How Telepathy Could Be Real

LandsUnknown

LandsUnknown

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
1,076
Location
United States
I have a theory of how telepathy could not only be plausible but also how it may work. I was reading about a principle known as quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement essentially means that when subatomic particles become paired, when the state of one is changed........ the other particle instantly and automatically changes despite how far apart they may be. In the future, highly advanced computers could be made that utilize this principle. It could instantly and automatically transmit massive amounts of information throughout the world. However, is it possible that these computers already exist........ and right within our brains 8o If our brains have some subatomic particles that are somehow entangled with subatomic particles in another person's brain or even with particles of everyone in the human race........... it would mean that this information would be instantaneously transmitted from one person to another 8o I am not saying that I have any real evidence for this being the case, other than what seemed to be appeared to be telepathic experiences that have happened in my life. However, I feel that this theory could explain the existence of telepathy. I don't know, just maybe and something to think about.
 
The development of telepathy on a widespread level will probably be very gradual. Lately I've been experimenting with delivering images, which I think - according to some studies I've heard about that are based around telepathy - starts with just sort of thinking about, visualizing, and mentally projecting either a simple image or a complex one. I'm also pretty sure that getting more involved than that - i.e. sending an actual "voice message" requires calling upon your higher self. Often times my higher self isn't willing to send something like that out there. It's like I don't have enough energy.

There was one time in my life - a very interesting and disturbing time - in which I felt that telepathy, on the magnitude you're talking about, was real. Imagine connecting your energy directly with another person's third eye chakra, forming an energy connection with their heart (through their tongue) and connecting back to their third eye chakra. With a mass of energy, all of a sudden you're reading everything within this person's Akashic Records and transferring data from your own. The energy linked here is theoretically so powerful that an entirely new language could be born.

Or at least that's the theory. I've never been able to word that shin-dig this well until now...

~Rigel
 
In order to answer that question, you need to be able to answer the question "What is a thought"

If the only principles at play in the operation of a brain were the physical principles we currently understand (electrical and chemical processes) then the answer is no. A thought in this case is a statistical process involving chemical reactions and interactions, concentration gradients, and threshold potentials localized in the complicated structures of an individuals brain. The minuscule fields associated with the movement of electrical charge cannot couple to another brain in such a way as to replicate that electrochemical complexity in another. Basically, telepathy has no conceivable physical mechanism based on our current understanding.

For the sake of argument though, lets say there is some mechanism — yet unknown — by which a state in the brain capable of becoming entangled can give rise to a thought in an individual. Lets also assume that through some unknown mechanism one causes these states to become entangled with another brain, well then telepathy still wouldn't work because of the no-communication theorem. This theorem proves the impossibility of transmitting information using entangles states. It's a pity too because entangled particles seem to suggest the possibility of faster-than-light communication, but turns out that's not gonna work.

We'd have to revisit the assumption made by science that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of the brain to explain telepathy. Basically, if consciousness can exist without a brain then it wouldn't be such a stretch to construct hypothesis about how consciousness can interact with more than one brain. Pure speculation as far a science is concerned. That hasn't stopped people from using their experience to construct detailed models, but these require assumptions and tests that are beyond the scope of current science.
 
I like the idea but I wonder how this would actually work. There's no real evidence that thought can be considered a type of subatomic particle so I don't really know quantum entanglement would produce telepathy. Thought seems to be an emergent phenomena based on the totality of the work brain rather then isolated into discrete particles. So, even if we shared a subatomic connection, there's no assurance that something like thought could be translated and transmitted as particle interaction.

Interesting idea mate :)
 
that's not how entanglement works. it rather means, that if two particles share a causal connectivity, you can make conclusions about one by looking at the other. there is no instantaneous communication in the physical world.
 
here's the thing about telepathy - it's not AT ALL like having a cell phone in your head. it's like being so in love with someone you think the same things - it's absolute connection. normal human minds can't take having that, then turning it off, switching to another. it's insane - don't try it.

i did at one point do some experiments with ketamine and telepathy, just images. we'd connect via chat and one of us would put up an image then we'd both IM the ketamine and the other would try to guess the image. it worked so well it was scary.
 
iridescentblack said:
The development of telepathy on a widespread level will probably be very gradual. Lately I've been experimenting with delivering images
Click to expand...

I once received 22 out of 25 images in a row. That was interesting, but it was so effortless, just like I thought of it naturally. I seem to have some latent tendency towards telepathy, anyway.
 
Ninae said:
I once received 22 out of 25 images in a row. That was interesting, but it was so effortless, just like I thought of it naturally. I seem to have some latent tendency towards telepathy, anyway.
Click to expand...
Are you talking about an actual scientific test? Like was it for some kind of study?
 
Bagseed said:
that's not how entanglement works. it rather means, that if two particles share a causal connectivity, you can make conclusions about one by looking at the other. there is no instantaneous communication in the physical world.
Click to expand...

This.

Quantum entanglement is definitely neat if you're into physics, but where it counts, transmission of information, it unfortunately falls short. I'd love if it didn't but it does. Quantum entanglement can't be used to transmit information, it just doesn't work like that.

Telepathy almost certainly doesn't exist, and here's two reasons why.

1. The lack if any known physical phenomena to explain the transmission of information consistent with everything else we know.
2. The lack of scientific evidence despite attempts to find it, when evaluated by people with an sufficient grasp of scientific method, and the pitfalls of confirmation bias and statistical probability.

Believe me, id love it if it were real, id love to believe in it. But gotta go where the evidence is, and it's not here.
 
Last edited:
If one day the evidence suggests that despite everything we thought we knew, it turns out telepathy probably does exist. I'll be delighted and happily change my mind.
 
I sometimes think I can communicate using telepathy with my girlfriend. I then realize that my schizoid tendencies are flaring up and I need to take my pill.

Most people that believe in telepathy have some form of schizophrenia or thought disorder IME.
 
The principle of quantum entanglement is notable as such- if 2 particles are entangled, no matter where they are in the Universe, if one changes spin the other changes also instantaneously, independent of the speed of light. This is indicative of some sort of underlying fabric hidden from our direct view, as in our observable universe is a downstream ripple of some sort of fundamental underlying structure that lay outside of time, from which time is only a function.

Please correct me if this is a flawed explanation for this quantum phenomena.
 
What I mean to imply is that both entangled particles may actually be 'reflections' of the same switch that underlies the observable phenomena.
 
There is a mental formula or things to be in place for it to take effect, Consider it a certain set of achieved realizations and acknowledged acceptances from yourself. Many of you are all very close at certain levels as it is an individual journey for the most part. I have read alot threads and listened even more to what I could for one night if you all are interested to reboot this topic in a new thread to narrow and condense all of your key points on what is actually relevant and key, I will join you after few pages and help keep you heading the right way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top