• CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

CD Social V. Dab or Die Tryin'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeaahhhhhh, I was placing the wax on the rim at first. Once I learned that the closer the better the hit, my face has been molten ever since. Dabs..... are... awesome. One hitter quitter type shit, and they last soooo long...



Definitely think I'm gonna invest in that Donuts one when I'm able to. This one'll do for now, though, what with the extra atomizers that came with it.
 
Jibult said:
Yeaahhhhhh, I was placing the wax on the rim at first. Once I learned that the closer the better the hit, my face has been molten ever since. Dabs..... are... awesome. One hitter quitter type shit, and they last soooo long...
Click to expand...

Welcome to the darkside, we're going to cut your flower consumption down to zero :) JK I'm glad you're enjoying it. Nice to switch things up though eh? If you go a week or two without flowers try them out again and it feels... different. Everyone complains about smoking hash all the time and raising tolerance to flowers, but I honestly don't feel it if I cut flowers out completely for a bit then go back. Always get a different body high when I smoke weed now no matter what the strain is, and hash feels more in the head no matter what strain it is... feels like a cleaner high I guess but I still like smokin' weed. Variety is the spice of life

Also check out this slab Bubbleman posted on instagram - it's a hash rosin from 11 year old cured IWE. Shit's SO red from THC turning to CBN over the years. I'd still smoke it though, probably stoney as fuck lol - Photo cred to @bcbubbleman on instagram

TUYa73R.png
 
Last edited:
ok guys i'm taking suggestions for a new thread Version.

our social moves pretty slow and the same thing over and over can lead to depression IMO

i thought interactive thread titles may spice things up a bit. what ya think, m8s?
 
Blank said:
ok guys i'm taking suggestions for a new thread Version.

our social moves pretty slow and the same thing over and over can lead to depression IMO

i thought interactive thread titles may spice things up a bit. what ya think, m8s?
Click to expand...

I miss pot or not, but I know it didn't get a lot of submissions. Was cool to see what everyone was smoking on across bluelight while it lasted.

Not gunna lie though I like the social thread more, even if it's the same thing over n over. I dig it. I feel like the people who consistently post here are the ones that really know their shit and give good feedback on whatever the topic is compared to some of the other threads I see in CD (no hate). That's just personal opinion though, and I also feel like some of the best questions / cannabis talk get posted on here. Pretty much zero trolling/flaming going on here too which is a plus. God bless CD Social

I also liked the "post a pic of your glass" or whatever threads, but those didn't seem to last either. I know there's a group on here that's really into the heady glass scene but doesn't seem like a big enough audience to keep an active thread going. Definitely enjoyed talking glass though on here with Felonious Monk and the others through the social thread. Awesome to see other like minded people who are into the art side of things.

Tough question though. It's hard to come up with something that everyone can engage in.
 
Last edited:
Jibult said:
Yeaahhhhhh, I was placing the wax on the rim at first. Once I learned that the closer the better the hit, my face has been molten ever since. Dabs..... are... awesome. One hitter quitter type shit, and they last soooo long...



Definitely think I'm gonna invest in that Donuts one when I'm able to. This one'll do for now, though, what with the extra atomizers that came with it.
Click to expand...

I'd like to welcome our latest convert, Jibult, into the 710 brotherhood.

May your dabs always be swift and true.
 
^I think I'm with you on all that. I kept meaning to submit something to Pot or Not too but I kept forgetting..

I kinda like the social as-is, it's developing into the daily hangout for the real stoners of Bluelight. I like how DaDankyDank has started bringing in more Hash Church and IG stuff, makes me feel like social media doesn't happen in a vacuum, that there's other intelligent people following the development of this culture. I can definitely make more of an effort too, if you're feeling like we need a bit more Spice Blank.

I love sharing glass too, some of my glass is just unique and publicly attached to my name/face that I was hesitant to post it here publicly. There's definitely some I could share though, I don't think I've posted a pic to BL though, I'll have to figure out hosting.
 
lol no i meant as in "CD Social V. *....*".

as in i'd change the thread title version to spice things up cuz opening the same titled thread just seemed boring in that this particular thread moves slow so we don't get to see a title change in months..
 
V. Red Eye Club

V. Red Eye District

V. Mile High Club

V. Hella High Club

V. Mile Stoned Club

V. Mild Stoned Club

V. Mild High Club

V. Mild High Cubs

V. Wild High Club

V. Wild High Cubs

V. Stoners Gone Mild

V. Greenlight

V. Green&lighters

V. Purplelight

V. Sticks and Stoners

V. Dabspeed

V. Potluck

V. Weednesday
hmm... might be it for now..
 
Last edited:


at around 13 minutes this guy "medicropper" talks about testing and lab results being bogus, or at least vastly inflated. He does make a good point about weed that is claimed to contain 20-30%+ THC, saying that even if you had 100% trichomes you still wouldn't have 100% THC because the trichomes contain fats and lipids.

What do you guys think
 
^ Only watched one minute, but he was talking about old Federal gov't testing in that part around 13-14 minutes. I'm not sure how MK Ultra? or whatever the fuck he is talking about, is relevant to today's testing.

And to answer his question, yes I believe buds to contain that much THC.
 
w01fg4ng said:
^ Only watched one minute, but he was talking about old Federal gov't testing in that part around 13-14 minutes. I'm not sure how MK Ultra? or whatever the fuck he is talking about, is relevant to today's testing.

And to answer his question, yes I believe buds to contain that much THC.
Click to expand...

Probably because it's not relevant... I have no idea where you got MK Ultra from my dude, he does not mention anything related to that at all... the only thing he talks about is testing and chromatography. He mentions government but doesn't specify whether it's federal, state or local. Also doesn't specify whether he is talking about public or private labs and tests...

anyways, was just wondering if anyone knew about current testing standards and regulations, if any, and how they have changed. Seemed like he was talking about something specific happening, like a change in regulation or something.
 
Mafioso said:
Probably because it's not relevant... I have no idea where you got MK Ultra from my dude, he does not mention anything related to that at all... the only thing he talks about is testing and chromatography. He mentions government but doesn't specify whether it's federal, state or local. Also doesn't specify whether he is talking about public or private labs and tests...

anyways, was just wondering if anyone knew about current testing standards and regulations, if any, and how they have changed. Seemed like he was talking about something specific happening, like a change in regulation or something.
Click to expand...
OK I've a got a minute now to answer your question...

At 14 minutes and 5 seconds he specifically refers to the "Federal Government". He then goes on to say how shady testing is and uses no references other than the "Federal Gov't" at 14:05.

Just like the laws vary by state, so do the testing procedures and requirements. There will be no universal testing standards until it becomes Federally legal.

With that said, Colorado has the highest testing standards for BHO production in the world currently (our ppm is the lowest). We also test for things like pesticides that are not suppose to be above a certain level either.
 
he's saying is the calibration on the tests are deliberately off, which could be true, but then it sounds like he thinks THC is only in trichomes and is overlooking the THC content of the resin that nugs can be soaked in. the one thing all the 25%+ THC strains I've tried had in common was that they were all so damn resinous it was more like handling a cinnamon bun than a nugget--scissors completely gummed up by the first snip, so much finger hash had to keep a ramiken of ISO around just to wash up after handling, and when you torch it the green doesn't start burning for a few seconds while the resin sizzles off! I have no doubt that stuff can hit 30% THC considering how much of it is not even plant green but resin.
 
w01fg4ng said:
14:09 to be exact.

This dude sounds like a conspiracy theorist.
Click to expand...

you're hilarious dude, where do you get MK ultra

thujone said:
he's saying is the calibration on the tests are deliberately off, which could be true, but then it sounds like he thinks THC is only in trichomes and is overlooking the THC content of the resin that nugs can be soaked in. the one thing all the 25%+ THC strains I've tried had in common was that they were all so damn resinous it was more like handling a cinnamon bun than a nugget--scissors completely gummed up by the first snip, so much finger hash had to keep a ramiken of ISO around just to wash up after handling, and when you torch it the green doesn't start burning for a few seconds while the resin sizzles off! I have no doubt that stuff can hit 30% THC considering how much of it is not even plant green but resin.
Click to expand...

Ok, yeah I feel like it could be true either way. Like maybe he isn't right about THC only being in the trichs, but it really does seem like he observed a big change in the testing procedures and results in his growing career. When you say you have no doubt, how do you know(fuck my question mark doesn't work lol),, there are many "tests" that are fraudulent because of things like what medicropper talks about. Cannabis wouldn't be the first industry to fudge the numbers on test results.

I guess I'm mostly curious about what sort of standards, if any, that labs must meet. Is there anything from keeping one from raising or lowering the threshold..
 
Mafioso said:
I guess I'm mostly curious about what sort of standards, if any, that labs must meet. Is there anything from keeping one from raising or lowering the threshold..
Click to expand...

None. No standards. Especially in California. There's ONE lab that qualifies under ISO standards, but nobody uses that lab. (in California, I think WA requires ISO certification) SC Labs and Steep Hill have TERRIBLE chain-of-custody procedures--I've had clients send them samples that they "retest" 3 times before they figure out that a sample that's high in CBD is not OG Kush (and even then they had to be told it was supposed to be high CBD).

Cannabis testing labs have a vested interest in delivering results that support their clients being good growers, and there is no standards or transparency (growers want their weed to be 30% THC with no pesticides, even if it's 20% and dirty af). This conflict of interest has lead to a statistical improbability--since their results are public info in Washington state, somebody was able to figure out which labs are honest and which are bullshit by how many dirty results they gave out...
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...in-state-failed-no-pot-at-all-says-scientist/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top