• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

Mass sexual assaults on New Year's Eve

Without borders and boundaries you have to spend your time trying to ward off advances from competing interests who see what you have and are willing to try and take it from you.

we have competing interests trying to take from each other now, only more forcefully than they would be able to otherwise. borders generate war more directly than religion. borders stifle economic competition, since differing jurisdictions with different laws are exploited by wealthy business only, who in turn undermine the legitimacy of state sovereignty when they offshore tasks to circumvent local law (which is the ONLY reason businesses offshore). borders imprison populations, making rule of law arbitrary, which means that whoever can take and keep power in any state are justified in doing whatever they like to do so. this causes poverty and starvation.

the ONLY people borders protect are those who shit on them
 
Not even going to bother replying to the rest of your post after this nonsense. Ever heard of the great wall of China?

What does this have to do with anything? Sure, a wall is an effective type of structure. What is your point? We are not talking about the physical reality of a wall, but are talking about the imagined idea of culture and borders.

But you basically prove my point. You are unwilling to see an alternative. Dismissing this as nonsense seems to indicate that. Obvious failing even for you SS.

And what alternative? In the real world you have murderers, rapists, opportunists who don't give a flying fuck about your morality, ethics or any hippy bullshit. Without borders and boundaries you have to spend your time trying to ward off advances from competing interests who see what you have and are willing to try and take it from you.

What do criminals have to do with borders and culture? Are you saying that the fact we have criminal elements in all societies mean that we should form countries and exclude people from them? What the fuck are you talking about? :D I see that you really haven't thought through your opinions after all. I'm not saying we should do away with rule of law. I'm saying that we should not value the shared imaginings of people over the people themselves. Can you honestly not understand that?

I look forward to you not responding to this nonsense too.
 
I'm saying that we should not value the shared imaginings of people over the people themselves. Can you honestly not understand that?

Yeh and I said I don't care, that culture is more valuable than people.
 
'But Hollande rejected the idea, saying: 'It is intolerable that in our country citizens should feel so upset and under assault because of their religious choice that they would conclude that they have to hide.'

How long ago did the country ban the burqa?

Here's an article about how it was a victory for tolerance and how brave the government was for banning a religious garment from the public.
 
How long ago did the country ban the burqa?

Here's an article about how it was a victory for tolerance and how brave the government was for banning a religious garment from the public.

i could be wrong, the way i remembered it - they didn't exactly ban the "burqa"

Not that it makes any difference because it was the same result, France banned anything that was a "religious symbol" iirc
 
As someone said very early in this thread, it's easy for us to point at the group of people who committed these assaults on new year and say they're wrong. And use it as a ground to criticise them. However in the west we've been educated about other cultures and belief's, and how to behave. They haven't, it's not good to allow this to become ground for us to start saying we shouldn't let them in.

I'd personally rather not have them here (brutally honest) however we (the west) have blown their homeland to bits. I don't agree with war either and I think basic humanity says we now must let them in because of what we've done to their homeland. However that's creating a whole host of other problems. All because of warmongering leaders with their own underlying agendas...
 
i'll call what i think end game is. it will take 20 years or so, but eh. some will call me conspiracy theorist. w.e the world is getting poor;

this here is an invasion of Europe . End game is - they (world super-powers) want EU as one nation - United States of Europe. the new police state will be easier to control that way. there will be no such thing as privacy.

it's believed that Germans / EU don't have guns - this is false. Citizens don't have guns of the scale of USA sure, however guns are still in circulation in Germany and EU. it's going to get (much more) messy, plus, if citizens want to get guns, they will get them even if the Governt. wants to disarm their citizens
 
Last edited:
As someone said very early in this thread, it's easy for us to point at the group of people who committed these assaults on new year and say they're wrong. And use it as a ground to criticise them. However in the west we've been educated about other cultures and belief's, and how to behave. They haven't, it's not good to allow this to become ground for us to start saying we shouldn't let them in.

I'd personally rather not have them here (brutally honest) however we (the west) have blown their homeland to bits. I don't agree with war either and I think basic humanity says we now must let them in because of what we've done to their homeland. However that's creating a whole host of other problems. All because of warmongering leaders with their own underlying agendas...

if we really want to help the refugess we would deport the migrants and help the refugees.

yes their culture is different. that is no excuse to bring their rape culture / treatmeant of females like dogs with them. that is no excuse to be let off the law of the land they are in and not face punishments for crimes. just like everyone else
we could help them without destroying our society, culture and progress these last 200 years in the process

note: these attacks are nothing new. only difference this time is the main news sources haven't been able to cover them up anymore
 
Last edited:
^this is like the typical phrase the leftist use when there are immigrants committing rapes. The other phrase is "oh its just a minority committing the crimes" lol

Yes, there are germans/french/spaniards/italians etc.. who commit crimes and rape. Its EXACTLY for this reason that we do NOT need to import ADDITIONAL potential criminals within our country when we already have our own criminals.

The fact that in my country immigrants make up roughly 50% of the inmates and they "only" account to 10% of the population demonstrates that there is something very wrong about this "multicultural utopia".

Is it so difficult to understand?
 
Last edited:
i could be wrong, the way i remembered it - they didn't exactly ban the "burqa"

It's a good thing we have public record, then innit?



Not that it makes any difference because it was the same result, France banned anything that was a "religious symbol" iirc

So the French Jews you speak of are illegally wearing the kippah in the first place?
 
yes, most likely. that is if i recall correctly.

doesn't excuse the fact that French-Jews are targeted for bashings and stabbings.
 
My Name is Al-Haashim Kamena Atangana and I have been reading in recent weeks sexual Assaults that have been occurring At York University. I just wanted to suggest a few changes within the Canadian laws that will help prevent sexual assaults from happening in the future.

Just to introduce myself I am a Muslim born in Montréal, Quebec 33 years ago. I was born in a Christian Family and I have decided to embrace Islam in 1998. I do allot of Islamic Outreach Programs downtown (yonge and Dundas).I am from African Carribean Ethnicity.

I wanted to mention that the reason why these sex attacks are continuously happening is because the Canadian laws, which gives too much freedom to women, are the cause of these sex attacks. It has been revealed that every 5 seconds a woman is being sexually assaulted in North America. Women in North America are falling victims of the Democratic Freedom that you they passionly believe in. The reason why a woman gets raped is because of the way she dress. Women dress so provocatively so much that they receive too much attention for themselves and that attention at times leads to death.

If the law enforcements and the Canadian politicians were very serious about solving this problem, they would introduce laws that would make it illegal for women to dress provocatively in the streets. It is true that many people would object to this if that were to happen. and this will definitely create protests and opposition. However by arresting sexual predators is not going to solve the problem because as long women continue to dress like this there will always be perverts and rapist who will continue to remain on the loose.

I am suggesting that Toronto becomes the first City in North America to introduce laws that would make it illegal for women to dress provocatively. If we do this the other cities would follow.

You should take your example from the way Muslim women dress. Why does Muslim women who wear long dress and covers her head aren’t targeted for sex attacks? Why is it that Rapists and sexual predators only target women that dress so provocatively? Because Muslim women have nothing to show in regards to her body.

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/16/muslim-clerics-letter-to-the-sun-about-preventing-sex-assault
 
Top