• H&R Moderators: streaM Freak

Is meat inherently unhealthy?

BAD FAT however you want to break it down. Whatever name you want to call it or whatever definition you want to assign to it has NO PLACE in ANY DIET.

There are really, really obviously diets that meet people's health needs that include animal products or vegetable products like coconut. Even across the really wide range of dietary advice given by qualified dietitians, most advise minimising saturated fat, not eliminating it completely. So the question of whether you mean saturated or trans fats when you yell BAD FAT at me like a toddler having a text-based tantrum is actually really important to establishing what you're trying to get across.

There is not good food that contains bad fat otherwise it would be a good food. There is a reason they are called BAD fats because they are BAD, this also means there are GOOD fats which are ok to eat. Which means there is NO need for bad fat and you cannot have a diet that consists of them
http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/national/resource/healthy-living-pyramid

Even if you ignore what I've been saying about individualised dietary needs, this is demonstrably untrue. You can go back to the most basic population level dietary advice given... here, here's the bloody food pyramid. You can't get more simple or institutionalised than that. http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/national/resource/healthy-living-pyramid Look, meat, yoghurt and cheese! All of these contain saturated fats, which are commonly labelled "bad fats" by people trying to convey nutrition principles to idiots who need things presented at PlaySchool levels of health literacy.

If you look beyond genPop guidelines, there are numerous people whose individual health needs make it a good idea to eat even more foods high in saturated fats - the person recovering from starvation I mentioned in my previous post, bodybuilders, children, people who struggle to extract protein or calcium from plant-based sources, people who really like dairy and would be depressed if they had to remove it from their diet, the list goes on.

No matter how you cut it there are plenty of diets that dont require you to be a food nazi that have all the necessary things any person would need regardless of any level of consumption based on the persons needs health or any of that

Yes, again, this was my point.

You saying its ok to have a soda or candy bar every so often when a person is following a normal diet has nothing to do with your main argument which was there is no bad diet.

Just re read my posts. Maybe have a few deep breaths first.
 
In all honesty I think some people just need to convince themselves that it's ok to eat garbage so they don't feel so bad about it. By Sixbucket's arguments eating Crisco out of the jar isn't inherently bad so it's probably futile to keep arguing about it.
 
Last edited:
Even if you ignore what I've been saying about individualised dietary needs, this is demonstrably untrue. You can go back to the most basic population level dietary advice given... here, here's the bloody food pyramid. You can't get more simple or institutionalised than that. http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/na...living-pyramid Look, meat, yoghurt and cheese! All of these contain saturated fats, which are commonly labelled "bad fats" by people trying to convey nutrition principles to idiots who need things presented at PlaySchool levels of health literacy.

Again you completely miss the point
Are there cheese and meat that has bad fat in it? Of course there is. Its not good for you and shouldnt be consumed!

When you buy meat and cheese you make sure to avoid processed garbage so that you dont get the bad fats! I already said there are plenty of foods that contain bad things that you should not eat! Hell they have been making an argument for quite some time that the food pryamid needs to be amended to clarify these things

Bread is on the food pyramid too that doesnt mean its ok to eat white bread!

What is the point of bringing up coconut? Thats an example of good fat and has absolutely nothing to do with your defense of the consumption of bad fats?

And its illagoic and uneducated dietary thinking like yours that has caused over half of america to be obese.

And im not have a "tantrum" im trying to correct the wrong things youre saying so people dont come here and eat processed garbage cheese and yogurt and 98% fat walmart meat because they see you said it was ok because cheese and meat are on the damn food pyramid

There is no list that goes "on and on" that would call for you to eat saturated fat when there are plenty of good and healthy sources of fat for you. I under get where you get these things from
 
Last edited:
Again you completely miss the point
Are there cheese and meat that has bad fat in it? Of course there is. Its not good for you and shouldnt be consumed!

Literally all meat and almost all dairy contains saturated ("bad") fat. If you eat these things, then you have a level of so-called "bad fats" in your diet. As long as it's a moderate quantity, this is permitted by almost all dietitians.

When you buy meat and cheese you make sure to avoid processed garbage so that you dont get the bad fats! I already said there are plenty of foods that contain bad things that you should not eat! Hell they have been making an argument for quite some time that the food pryamid needs to be amended to clarify these things

You seem to think that saturated fat in meat is a product of processing? It's not - everything you buy fresh from a butcher contains saturated fats. A coconut that you cut straight from the tree contains saturated fats.

The food pyramid was recently amended - I linked you to the 2015 revised version.

What is the point of bringing up coconut? Thats an example of good fat and has absolutely nothing to do with your defense of the consumption of bad fats?

Coconuts are high in saturated fats. So are palm nuts. Coconut oil is almost entirely saturated fat, just like animal fat, and is believed to raise LDL cholesterol. Google it if you don't believe me. Still acceptable to include coconut in a healthy diet, as people in South East Asia have been doing for millennia.

And im not have a "tantrum" im trying to correct the wrong things youre saying so people dont come here and eat processed garbage cheese and yogurt and 98% fat walmart meat because they see you said it was ok because cheese and meat are on the damn food pyramid

Most people coming here seems to have higher levels of both language and health literacy than you do, so I'm pretty sure they'll be just fine at picking up what I'm actually saying.

There is no list that goes "on and on" that would call for you to eat saturated fat when there are plenty of good and healthy sources of fat for you. I under get where you get these things from

Lol. You better be a strict vegan who excludes coconut and palm oil, or you're basically talking out of your ass.

In all honesty I think some people just need to convince themselves that it's ok to eat garbage so they don't feel so bad about it.

Eh, I've already explained what my diet generally consists of, and I think you'd struggle to call it 'garbage'.

By Sixbucket's arguments eating Crisco out of the jar isn't inherently bad so it's probably futile to keep arguing about it.

You are correct that I do not think there is anything morally wrong with eating Crisco out of the jar. I'd still advise people not to do it, because it's not a wise health choice for almost anyone.

Maybe Mycophile should come back and explain my points again for you? They seem to go over your head when I say them.
 
All meat contains bad fat? Have you ever heard of turkey meat before? Low fat turkey meat has literally no fat in it at all. Chicken like turkey meat has such a minimal amount that it its normally burned out during cooking and has little to no value

No i dont think thats where saturated fats come from but its much higher in processed foods as well as sodium

Considering that no one agrees with you except for a person who misunderstood what you were trying to say I would say my knowledge is on point

I use the paleo diet and consume plenty of foods that consist of no bad fat because of the amount im supposed to consume as opposed to the amount of carbs I take in. So im not talking out of my ass at all

And youre now back trying on your statements. If you eat normally and take care of yourself then yes, in moderation technically you can consume anything you want I never dispused that. But you have said time and time again that "no diet is unheritely unhealthy" and thats just completely wrong

Eating something in moderation does not count as a part of your diet. Thats why people who eat properly or stay on strict diets call things like eating candy bars "cheat meals"
 
Eating something in moderation does not count as a part of your diet. Thats why people who eat properly or stay on strict diets call things like eating candy bars "cheat meals"
Uh, what?!

Dude, you're the one talking about "good" fats vs "bad" fats.
Sixbouquets is saying that things aren't that black and white. I don't understand the hang-up here.
 
Why, yes.

That's not much of a question.
I'm not being aggressive, i have read the thread. It is painful to read, to be honest.

I wasnt being aggressive either, again I did nothing more then ask if you have read the thread. You said the poster is saying something thats black and white and its not.

The argument started with this:
There is no such thing as a diet that is universally unhealthy or universally healthy. The possible exception is trans fats, but even the kinds of foods that tend to be high in trans fats can be 'healthy' for some people with very specific dietary needs if you look at their total nutritional makeup.

And thats not true, there are plenty of diets that are unhealthy for you.
There is also no diet to my knowledge that would ever call for consumption of trans considering the fact there are plenty of good fats.

Its doesnt get any more black and white then that. The poster has said a bunch of things and ill admit we have gone off topic on various things but the fact remains there are plenty of unhealthy diets.
 
I think the problem with this debate is that there is food that is high in crap your body doesn't need but does have some nutrients. Like a Big Mac for example is high in sodium, preservatives and saturated fat but you're also getting a fair amount of protein. So not everything about a Big Mac is bad, but it would still be better to get your protein from a healthier source. That's not to say that you couldn't fit a Big Mac into an otherwise healthy diet once in a while, but at least here in the US a lot of people don't get moderation and half of their diet is fast food.

You are correct that I do not think there is anything morally wrong with eating Crisco out of the jar. I'd still advise people not to do it, because it's not a wise health choice for almost anyone.

ALMOST anyone? lol Tell me exactly who NEEDS Crisco. I've never heard of anyone with a Crisco deficiency. This is the problem with your argument. I get where you're coming from but you can't admit that there are "food" products out there that nobody needs, and I use the term food loosely.
 
All meat contains bad fat? Have you ever heard of turkey meat before? Low fat turkey meat has literally no fat in it at all. Chicken like turkey meat has such a minimal amount that it its normally burned out during cooking and has little to no value

Turkey contains small amounts of saturated fat, just like any meat or dairy product. You're right that the amount of saturated fat in some cuts of turkey is very small, but you are the one arguing that no one should consume any of this substance ever, not me.

I use the paleo diet and consume plenty of foods that consist of no bad fat because of the amount im supposed to consume as opposed to the amount of carbs I take in. So im not talking out of my ass at all

I hate to break it to you, mate, but if you're eating meat, you're eating saturated fats. I'm not judging (I'm the person who thinks there shouldn't be a moral element to what we eat, remember?) and it's entirely likely that you're eating in accordance to your body's needs. But if you think you're excluding absolutely all "bad" fats (or that you need to), you're simply wrong.

If you eat normally and take care of yourself then yes, in moderation technically you can consume anything you want I never dispused that.

You did dispute that. Repeatedly. Half the thread consists of you disputing that statement.

Eating something in moderation does not count as a part of your diet.

This is such a completely nonsense interpretation of the word "diet" that I am baffled as to what you are trying to say.

I'm not being aggressive, i have read the thread. It is painful to read, to be honest.

I know, right?

I
And thats not true, there are plenty of diets that are unhealthy for you.

Yes, there are plenty of diets that are unhealthy for you. There are plenty of diets that are unhealthy for me. There are plenty of diets that are unhealthy for Joe the Bodybuilder or Desiree the recovering bulemic or Evan the Toddler. My point has been that these diets - and their healthy equivalents - might be wildly different for each person. One person's unhealthy is another person's ideal consumption.

I think the problem with this debate is that there is food that is high in crap your body doesn't need but does have some nutrients. Like a Big Mac for example is high in sodium, preservatives and saturated fat but you're also getting a fair amount of protein. So not everything about a Big Mac is bad, but it would still be better to get your protein from a healthier source. That's not to say that you couldn't fit a Big Mac into an otherwise healthy diet once in a while, but at least here in the US a lot of people don't get moderation and half of their diet is fast food.

Exactly correct! Literally no one has been saying "It is a good idea for most people in Western nations to eat Big Macs all the time." No one. But a diet that includes a Big Mac every now and then within the dietary needs of the individual is not "unhealthy" just because that person's salt, preservative and fat intake for that period has disproportionately come from one item (putting aside the fact that Maccas is freaking disgusting).

And even if the Big Mac does contain more salt or fat or preservatives than an individual "shoul"d be eating, that doesn't make the Big Mac "bad". It's not sinful to eat the Big Mac even if doing so is a poor dietary choice.

ALMOST anyone? lol Tell me exactly who NEEDS Crisco.

I can think of plenty of uses for Crisco, but none of them involve nutrition.

I've never heard of anyone with a Crisco deficiency.

Nope, but there are definitely people who are advised to eat high fat meals for a period of time. I can't think of any instances in which a doctor would advise literally eating Crisco out of the jar, but as I said above I know someone who was advised to add sour cream (basically saturated fat) to their meals to gain weight. And that's just in the sphere of people I know personally.

This is the problem with your argument. I get where you're coming from but you can't admit that there are "food" products out there that nobody needs, and I use the term food loosely.

You're setting up a strawman. I never said anyone "needed" to eat vegetable shortening straight, or that doing so was a healthy food choice. I never said anyone "needed" to eat Big Macs or Snickers Bars or Pepsi or any of the other Ooga Booga BAD foods you're all throwing out there. I just said that, for some people with specific medical and health needs, higher than usual quantities of saturated fat might be a positive and healthy dietary addition. As such, it's incorrect to call these foods universally "unhealthy".
 
Ok, but how am I setting up a strawman? Do you not agree that there are things like high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oil, trans fats and countless additives that nobody needs and are bad for your heath? Because by your own admission there are no "bad" foods. The things I listed may not be foods in and of themselves, but they certainly fall under food products. I also don't understand why you keep adding "morality" to your argument because I'm just talking about it from a nutrition standpoint.
 
Ok, but how am I setting up a strawman? Do you not agree that there are things like high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oil, trans fats and countless additives that nobody needs and are bad for your heath?

You're setting up a strawman because you keep trying to say I'm saying people "need" foods that are generally unhealthy choices. I'm not - I'm saying that these food choices (and I'm talking about foods, not nutritional components like trans fats and high fructose corn syrup) may be "healthy" for people with specific dietary and caloric needs, like needing a really enormous caloric intake in a short period of time. In that context, yes, trans fats still have unhealthy effects on the body (specifically the heart) but it may be more important for that individual's health needs to prioritise kilojules, fats or salts.

It's also a weird tangent because most of what we've been talking about is the concept of the "unhealthy" diet, which is even further from nutritional components. As you yourself said a few posts up, it's perfectly possible for a healthy diet to accommodate moderate quantities of these "bad" foods and not suddenly become "unhealthy". And, as I've said at least ten times now, the idea of what "healthy" and "unhealthy" are vary wildly from individual to individual, so it's reductive and not particularly useful to label foods as inherently "healthy"/"unhealthy" or especially "good"/"bad".

Because by your own admission there are no "bad" foods. The things I listed may not be foods in and of themselves, but they certainly fall under food products.

There are no bad foods because eating is not a moral exercise. It is still totally possible for a food choice to be poorly aligned with an individual's nutritional and health needs and for it therefore to be not a great choice for them to eat it. I don't eat a lot of things because they don't meet my physical and mental health needs - this doesn't make them "bad" and it doesn't mean that they're "unhealthy" for every human on the planet.

I also don't understand why you keep adding "morality" to your argument because I'm just talking about it from a nutrition standpoint.

If you're calling something "bad", you're a assigning a moral value to it. "Bad" isn't a nutritional or medical concept.
 
No, this is what you said which is why we are having this discussion

There is no such thing as a diet that is universally unhealthy or universally healthy. The possible exception is trans fats, but even the kinds of foods that tend to be high in trans fats can be 'healthy' for some people with very specific dietary needs if you look at their total nutritional makeup.

Can I get by on a mcdonalds diet yes or no?
 
No, this is what you said which is why we are having this discussion

"There is no such thing as a diet that is universally unhealthy or universally healthy. The possible exception is trans fats, but even the kinds of foods that tend to be high in trans fats can be 'healthy' for some people with very specific dietary needs if you look at their total nutritional makeup."

Can I get by on a mcdonalds diet yes or no?

Key words: "universally", "I" and "get by".

I have no idea what affect eating heaps of McDonalds would have on you personally, because I know nothing about your physiology, general health, nutritional needs, mental health and other medical conditions. I know that eating McDonalds would be unhealthy for me, so I don't eat it.

However, it's a dumb question. Yes, you could probably "get by" on a McDonald's diet, because McDonald's is food and humans are capable of surviving on some really extremely inadequate diets for quite some time. You might not feel great, though, and you might pay for it in later life. As nutty pointed out, even McDonald's food has nutritional components that can be beneficial in some circumstances.
 
Top