Its been hypothesised reducing testosterone quickly might create an high oestradiol environment and hence: low test:high E2 ratio which can in some people be responsible for symptoms of gynecomastia....
Although in your case Test at 350mg was hardly high, plus you ran an AI which should have controlled E2..
Isn't high prolactin reputed to be modulated by estrogen, not the other way round..
Was your Tren really nandrolone, was your AI bunk, are you overly sensitive to E2..?
There seem to be too many anecdotal reports of gyno whilst using tren to just state manage E2, you manage gyno.. I don't know..??
Sorry GF I'll clarify scenarios:
******************************************
350mg test with NO AI = ZERO gyno symptoms, regardless of duration.
175mg test and 350mg tren = puffy and itchy nipples past 4 weeks, with or without the added or ongoing use of an AI (in my case exemestane, 12.5mg EOD. Even raised it to 25mg EOD after the first signs of gyno to no avail).
******************************************
So LOW test with the addition of Tren gave symptoms that didn't fade with the addition of an AI nor an increase of the AI dosage. HIGH test by itself gave no obvious symptoms.
Given my source for all my UGL gear, I'm as close to being certain it's legitimate as one can get without being the 'cook' themselves haha. My AI was sourced from a 100% legitimate online pharmaceutical company (and given Australia's import laws on certain prescription meds, it comes through customs fine lol).
And your last line is the main reason I brought it up once more - I absolutely trust your knowledge of these mechanisms above almost anyone else I know, yet my experiences (without supporting bloodwork, mind you) tell a different story. It's annoying when something happens that by our current understanding of how this shit works
shouldn't happen
