Sorry Si i was just doing my socratic conspiracist thing.
...
Si: i did read a lot of stuff about dunblane a while back, but it was very mixed up with disinformation (lots of tenuous stuff about george robertson that didn't seem to bear scrutiny) - seems likely there's something important there with the 100 years thing (some sort of royal link maybe), though this is usually answered by saying they made it secret to protect the names of victims (which seems plausible). As with the chemtrails the absence of something can't on its own be positive enough evidence for me - there's enough circumstantial to justify sustained digging to be sure - i'll check out the woman you mentioned to catch up.
To me the big paedo story right now which doesn't seem to be widely known is 'Govenrment pushes back paedo inquiry's report until after the next election' that i seem to remember hearing; not to mention 'BBC tries to push back the report into itself about paedos until 2016, after their charter has been renewed' (suggesting that the results are going to be damning); and then there's the one i put in the other paedo thread 'Dragons Den star who was advisor to cameron and osbourne (pig-fucker and the gimp/oik) charged with paedo offences from earlier this year' (story released on the same day as cameron announced those drones killings so hardly anyone noticed); plus all the harvey proctor 'i'm innocent! but i'm leaving the country just in case' stuff.
No need to apologise, again, my thread gets views while you guys jabber about chemtrails
I apologise for being snarky, whatever that is.
Yes, the gag order is said to have been to hide more than just the identities of the young people, all now in their 30's, 40's, 50's who might have been caught up in Hamiltons activities. But the names of people involved could easily be redacted & this precedent has been set many times. Papers are released so as to illustrate, for instance, a time-line of events without naming the persons involved.
Sandra Uttlley has incontravertible evidence that Thomas Hamilton was NOT killed by his own hand. The accepted narrative is that after shooting 16 kids & a teacher in the school gym, despite having considerable amounts ammunition left, he turned his gun on himself. But witnesses on the day, including an off-duty police officer whose evidence was for some inexplicable reason excluded from the enquiry, claim to have seen evidence that Hamilton was shot by someone else. Another witness, parents of a dead child, claimed to have seen bullet holes behind Hamilton's dead body, where he would have had no reason to fire rounds. This man was adept with his weapons, he shot on ranges regularly, he had many Police friends. He would not have fired into an empty wall with no targets in the area other than himself!
No-one knows why but it is suspected that someone encouraged Hamilton to visit the school with his guns & deliberately shadowed him to the school with the intention of stopping him from doing too much harm. Apparently, Hamilton planned to murder the headmaster in front of assembly, but when he realised he'd missed the assembly he flew into a rage & shot the kids in a fury. For some reason whomever shadowed Hamilton that day was armed & killed him before he could do any more harm. Despite the fact that this man would be a hero, no-one knows who he is/was...
Someone else killed Hamilton that day. His paedophile history & his paedophile connections have been covered up. WHO were his paedophile connections? WHO shot him if he did not kill himself?
Uttley says she has presented her evidence to every major paper in the country & not one of them will touch it. She has PROOF that Hamilton did not kill himself, but not one paper in this country will report it! Remember when Prince Harry served in Afghanistan & the worlds media played along & kept schtum until some Aussies got hold of the story? The newspapers & media outlets were TOLD that Harry was in Afghanistan & to keep quiet about it.
Even Uttley has had enough. She encourages me to continue her work & put me in touch with an investigative reporter from Exaro who is going to be seeing Uttley & get hold of all her evidence to go through. There's a lot of it, takes up a room. Big job. I may be able to help with the reading but that's about all I can do
Plenty of reporters working on the more prescient stories of paedophiles you mention at the bottom of your post. No-one wants to touch Dunblane even though paedophile stories are busting open left, right & centre. Why?
