• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Queen "disappears" Canadian Mohawk children, Maloney outs Prince Charles, Dunblane

More on exarro from Kerr (following on from the 60 minutes program) - http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5601/video-kincora-was-used-for-political-leverage-richard-kerr

Says Kincora was all about "gaining leverage over others for political reasons during the troubles"

...article about the badly recorded interview with Andrew Kerr - http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5608/richard-kerr-names-powerful-men-who-covered-up-kincora

It's impossible to highlight & copy from Exaro. Is this just me? But I thought I'd copy this bit out from the above link coz it's JUICY!

According to Kerr, amongst those who aided in the cover up of the Kincora Boys Home scandal in Belfast, Northern Ireland are :-
Lord Mountbatten, cousin to the Queen & great uncle to Prince Charles, chief of the defence staff 1959 to 1975, murdered by the IRA in 1979

Kerr also names, Sir Maurice Oldfield, Director of the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, Sir Anthony Blunt, also once of MI6, then a Russian spy.

But it's the naming of Mountbatten that I have been awaiting. This is another step closer to public outing of Prince Charles! More corroboration for my contention that the royals are riddled with perversion & paedophilia.

Burn it down!

edit - & this is Tom O'Carroll, author & the paedophile apologist in the 60 Minutes video - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tom-OCarroll/116341228413065?fref=ts
 
Last edited:
I'm just reminding myself. At the beginning of this thread the only time I could find mention of how Lord Louis Mountbatten was perhaps a creepy paedophile was on some worryingly unprofessional looking blogs & stuff. Now I've got mention of Mountbatten in an Exaro report. He is not exactly being fingered directly, but rather is being accused of suppressing or covering up complaints against MP's or other luminaries who were abusing children. Leon Brittan is accused of similar things, but he is also accepted as being a paedophile. I wonder how long it will be before Mountbatten is accepted as a paedophile too...

... & I wonder how long it will be before this starts creeping closer to people like prince philip (aka lucifer the greek), the pervy princes charles & andrew, & our dear queen herself..?
 
Si, I share your dream. But they are a slithery bunch. I used to read Chris spivey so stuff but he's away with the fairies. His monsters inc. article about the royals is pretty good. Forgot what I was going to say. Spivey, spivey, spivey what was I going to say?
Oh yeah, we can be ever hopeful sailed was outed albeit after his death . It's the blinkers folk have on that drives me mad. How they are all so interconnected. The thought police are gaining more powers .
 
But it's the naming of Mountbatten that I have been awaiting. This is another step closer to public outing of Prince Charles!

I've no love for Charlie Windsor whatsoever, but that is utter swivel-eyed tosh. Are you going to 'investigate' Savile's entire family at the same time? Why not Simon fucking Mayo while we're at it?

A tenuous allegation against one member of the Clan Battenhun does not an overarching conspiracy make. You're obsessed with nonces, and it's pretty disturbing.
 
You're obsessed with nonces, and it's pretty disturbing.

You're pretty disturbing.

Who was pouring scorn upon the the "Dunblane Conspiracy"? Perhaps whomever that was might want to have a look at the book Dunblane Unburied. The book raises so many questions regarding the investigation into Hamiltons actions that day that I don't know where to begin. I'm about halfway through the book, it turned up yesterday. It cost a couple quid. Not alot to pay for knowledge, is it?

Apparently, the papers that are held for 100 years are being held to maintain the anonymity of the children affected by Hamilton. But there is no precedent for documents to be held for 100 years unless there is the involvement of an MI6 agent. Documents usually held in secret by government for only 30 or 50 years. No documents are held in secret for 100 years that don't involve MI6 other than the Dunblane documents. Was an MI6 agent involved?

As I say, it's claimed that the documents are held to maintain anonymity of those affected. But Hamiltons autopsy report is also being kept secret. Why? No other people would be affected by disclosure of his autopsy results. Perhaps the report will show that Hamilton did not kill himself!

Some people seem to think that in fact someone armed was shadowing Hamilton that day & that in fact Hamilton did not kill himself but was interrupted in his rampage & killed by someone else. No-one can explain, as far as I can tell, why another person would have been near enough to stop Hamilton with a gunshot only 3 minutes after he began his massacre. During the Cullen enquiry some references to other wounds than the apparently self-inflicted head wound which killed Hamilton were made, of wounds to other parts of his body including his torso. How did he get these wounds? Hamilton had been wearing a hat & glasses which were next to his body. The hat had a hole in it. Did he remove his hat & glasses after he shot himself in the head? How? How else could the hat have had a hole in it? How else could it have been removed? Did someone tamper with the evidence, was his body moved or otherwise adjusted? One of the students claimed to have seen a Policeman kill "the bad man". No Policeman had attended the school before Hamilton had apparently killed himself other than an off-duty fellow who's evidence was bizarrely not heard at the Cullen Enquiry! So who was this Policeman the child saw & how did he come to be armed! If he were an MI6 agent, that might explain why he was armed & that would help explain the 100 year secrecy, but that does nothing to explain his presence on the day! Bullet holes behind Hamilton, where he would have had no reason to fire rounds were also found & remain unexplained. To me, if the exist(ed) they suggest that someone was firing back at Hamilton! Who, & why was he there, armed?

Contradictory evidence from witnesses & Police as to how many weapons he had, what sorts of weapons, how much ammo he had with him & how he had transported it to the school. CCTV footage regarding his movements leading up to the killings were lied about in court, by Police officers! Only 175 witnesses were called but well over 1500 were not asked to appear, & their evidence was never heard.

Then there's the sickening history of this guys paedophile behaviour, his connections within the Police in his area & his successful applications to own weapons which were aided by his contacts. Some suggest he was trading paedophile images for guns & favours & that he had many connections in high places.

Hamilton was also rumoured to be amongst the "friends of QVC" who had a suspiciously wide access to it's borders at all hours & that school is associated with prince charles & of course, that leads me right back to where we started, again...

These are just the tip of an iceberg FULL OF HOLES! The cover-up is so perforated that the entire debacle has been hidden from us for 100 years in a move that has no precedent!

Anyway, don't mind me, I'm not the author. If you doubt these words, go read all these instead!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dunblane-Un...=1437689411&sr=1-1&keywords=dunblane+unburied

314F0X9G86L._SX311_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've no love for Charlie Windsor whatsoever, but that is utter swivel-eyed tosh. Are you going to 'investigate' Savile's entire family at the same time? Why not Simon fucking Mayo while we're at it?

A tenuous allegation against one member of the Clan Battenhun does not an overarching conspiracy make. You're obsessed with nonces, and it's pretty disturbing.

Nice to see you round these parts again. Bit harsh to say obssessed with nonces and it's not disturbing to be interested in it imo; even if there are no further bombshell names to come out (and there are), the last 30 years worth of establishment paedophile covering up activity is still one of the biggests political scandals in history - we probably wont see how big a scandal for another 20 years when everyone's dead. They've more or less admitted now that deputy head of MI6, leon brittan and peter morrison (aide to thatch) were part of a paedo ring. I'm very interested in this story which could bring a whole house of cards down (or not) - pretty damn important (which obviously makes it important not to get sucked into unsubstantiated disinformation and guilt by association).

There have been persistent rumours of various sorts about Battenburg going back years that just wont go away despite best efforts (not bad for a cake); though i don't need to pretend that every/any royal family members are satanic paedos to know they're my enemy: up against the wall with 'em! (i wouldn't shoot them personally, maybe shove em against the wall for old times' sake, then let them go and make them live on proper benefits on a council estate)
 
One other reason a judge might gag documents for 100 years is if a member of the royal family were named in them! Just saying... coincidence I'm sure...

So is this an awesome cover-up or what? How many times has Dunblane come up over these past months & these 8 or 9 pages? Dunblane is the biggest, most obvious, most suspicious ever cover-up of establishment paedos & I've literally only just gotten into investigating it because I have only just discovered it. I had not idea how much of the Cullen enquiry had been controlled by "the crown". The crown chose which persons evidence was heard & which persons wasn't. The crown, through Cullen & his 100 years gag, controlled what little the public were to know about what was supposed to be an open public inquiry into an event about which every person in Britain had, apparently, a right to know!

Hamilton had a lot of wealthy visitors, often turning up in fancy cars, sometimes in chauffeur driven limos & who often stayed only a few minutes. No detailed investigation was made into these contacts who had been arriving to meet with Hamilton regularly in the weeks, months & years before his attack, & even on the day right before he killed all those kids. Who were these people who vistied Hamilton so regularly & conspicuously? Remember, Hamilton had been suspected of involvement in a paedo ring in the years prior to March 1996 & in the days before the internet, indecent images of children would have been traded face-to-face. There seems little doubt that he ran his kids camping trips to gain access to young children whom he photographed & video taped extensively. Is this why Hamilton had fancy ass visitors? Is this why he had sympathetic guns license supporters despite the widely held concerns about his behaviour both with his weapons & with children! He is known to have actually shot children on his little camping excursions with an air-rifle for fucks sake! How is it that he retained access to both children AND fire-arms despite many, many years of concerns & actual complaints about him? Hamilton had many mystery friends who it seems were also powerful people who turned up in fancy, chauffeur driven cars & it's thought that their background interventions is the reason he was getting away with this all this shit. Rich, powerful paedos! These people are not fucking dead! They're probably still swanning around in their fucking limos picking up indecent images or footage of children being abused or at the vary least, sadistically treated! Sadistic treatment of children, particularly boys, appears to have been Hamiltons personal kick...

The people who facilitated Hamiltons access to children & weapons have been completely ignored & over-looked by the inquiry!

The media have barely touched this story in close to 20 years now! What's stopping them, in light of savile? D-Notices, perhaps? Again? Still...
 
Last edited:
I've no love for Charlie Windsor whatsoever, but that is utter swivel-eyed tosh. Are you going to 'investigate' Savile's entire family at the same time? Why not Simon fucking Mayo while we're at it?

A tenuous allegation against one member of the Clan Battenhun does not an overarching conspiracy make.

So the rumours that charles mentor Mountbatten was a paedo, & charles infamously close relationship to savile do not quite do it for you, no?

Charles also gave succour to "his friend" Reverend Peter Ball who was arrested for abusing kids in the 80's & 90's & had to resign as bishop of Gloucester after being charged - from - http://www.activistpost.com/2012/11/the-prince-and-pedophile-charles.html

As reported by the Digital Journal, the Right Reverend Peter Ball is the most senior member of the Church of England to be arrested for offenses against children. Ball was arrested on eight suspected cases of abuse against boys and young men ranging from ages 12 to 20 during the 1980s to 1990s. Ball, who was the former Bishop of Gloucester, resigned in 1993 after he was served with a police caution for “committing an act of gross indecency against a teenager.”

Upon his resignation, Ball retired to Manor Lodge, “a wisteria-clad property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall.” Manor Lodge is a property of the Prince's Duchy of Cornwall.

In reference to his new living arrangements, Ball stated, “He (Prince Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house. The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person.”

Considering the connections and personal friendships maintained by Prince Charles, one must question whether or not Charles himself has had some experience in the underworld of pedophilia. At the very least, the Prince is the absolute worst judge of character who ever lived.

My basic contention is described above in bold, that there were too many connections between savile, charles, mountbatten to be a coincidence & this Rev Ball bullshit is just a little more icing on one stinky shit-cake!
 
I reckon big Bob maxwell is still alive and if he's not already dead he certainly didn't die in the sea that time. It would be easy for him to live his days out in luxury on the profits of the pension scheme and indeed the daily mirror. He's a man that would know a lot.
 
...My basic contention is described above in bold, that there were too many connections between savile, charles, mountbatten to be a coincidence & this Rev Ball bullshit is just a little more icing on one stinky shit-cake!

First i'm afraid i don't give much credence to people who talk about 'pedophilia' (inappropriate love of feet?). The rest sounds like guilt by association (in terms of prince charles himself) which is a blind alley that too often separates a journalist from a conspiracy researcher (albeit that there are plenty of the latter working in the manstream media and at least some of the former in the alternative 'conspiracy' world (lobster lobster lobster)). When you're talking about a small interconnected world like the elite it's possible to make those sort of connections between all of them about practically anything ('ooh, he went to the same school as that one, and they both worked for that bank, and they're cousins' etc) - this is the bread and butter of most of the conspiracy world, but it means little really and only serves to discredit the person using it.

Of course it's possible to draw attention to these connections in a more general sense of illustrating how class allegiance functions to maintain the status quo that benefits them (including covering stuff up that might interfere with the current setup, rather than because they're all paedophiles or satanists)
 
I've no love for Charlie Windsor whatsoever, but that is utter swivel-eyed tosh. Are you going to 'investigate' Savile's entire family at the same time? Why not Simon fucking Mayo while we're at it?

A tenuous allegation against one member of the Clan Battenhun does not an overarching conspiracy make. You're obsessed with nonces, and it's pretty disturbing.

More tenuous allegations..?

Not Saviles entire family/friends perhaps (thought is brother is also a known sex offender!), just the ones about whom paedo rumours have circulated for decades. I'm sure the relationship between Jimmy Savile & Ted Heath are pure coincidence just like the one between Savile & charles, & have no bearing whatsoever on organised paedophillia.

When I started digging into this smelly shit the Heath accusations were not being taken seriously. They are now.

from - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-33755726

The police watchdog is to investigate whether officers failed to pursue allegations of child abuse made against former
Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath.

A retired detective has alleged that claims were made in the 1990s but not followed up.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission will also look at whether a case was dropped when a person involved made the claims against Sir Edward.

Anyone with information is asked to contact police.

The inquiry was opened after claims made by a retired senior officer were referred to the IPCC by Wiltshire Police.
'Never spoken out'

Sir Edward died at his home in Salisbury in 2005 aged 89.

An IPCC spokesman said: "It is alleged that a criminal prosecution was not pursued when a person threatened to expose that Sir
Edward Heath may have been involved in offences concerning children.

"In addition to this allegation, the IPCC will examine whether Wiltshire Police subsequently took any steps to investigate these claims."

In a statement, Wiltshire Police said: "Sir Edward Heath has been named in relation to offences concerning children.

"He lived in Salisbury for many years and we would like to hear from anyone who has any relevant information that may assist us in our inquiries or anyone who believes they may have been a victim.

"Some people may never have spoken out about the abuse they have suffered but we would urge them to please contact us and to not suffer in silence."

The Sir Edward Heath Charitable Foundation, which operates the museum at Arundells, his home in Salisbury, said it welcomed the investigation.

"We wholeheartedly believe (it) will clear Sir Edward's name and we will co-operate fully with the police in their enquiries," a spokesman said.

Sir Edward led the 1970-1974 Conservative government and took Britain into what was then the European Economic Community.

His time in power was beset by industrial action and economic difficulties that forced him to introduce a three-day week.

He lost his leadership of the party to Margaret Thatcher in 1975 - something he never forgave her for and he refused to serve in her cabinet.

In his later years he became the Father of the House of Commons, the longest-serving MP.

He was a successful author, an avid art-collector and a world-class yachtsman.
 
Um, Si, that's about Ted Heath. Fair enough, it's of some substance, but it's completely unrelated to what I was addressing in my post.

I worry about you. I really do.
 
Ted Heath...the countries pm. He would have been well guarded. A lot of people around him therefore a lot of people knowing about his activities and doing nothing about it ...a la James savile of the Yorkshire moors, friend of Jack the Ripper...
 
This is the worst smell coming of the old school establishment-paedo cover-up shit-heap I've had the pleasure of wiffing yet!

Did you hear that Jersey & Kent have joined the Met & Wiltshire police investigating claims against him?

This ties in nicely with all that paranoid conspiracy theory shit that I was posting about months & months ago concerning the royals, savile & the hundreds of missing kids from the Haut de la Garenne in Jersey! How the skeptics scoffed when I posted about this! I got lots of David Icke comparisons for my trouble.

Icke must have heard about this Wiltshire madame, who dodged a court appearance for running a brothel by claiming heath was a customer, & one who enjoyed the younger items. She was later convicted but again claimed, this time in court, that heath was a client! This was early to mid 90's & apparently Icke started writing about heaths peado connections in the late 90's. I've never read Ickes work & I never shall. I tried but his whole writing style is unbearable, it's ridiculously sensationalist! I gave up before getting past the first few pages.

Um, Si, that's about Ted Heath. Fair enough, it's of some substance, but it's completely unrelated to what I was addressing in my post.

I worry about you. I really do.

Really? I worry about you if you fail to see the relevance but hey ho, crack on what..?
 
Last edited:
seeing you kindly edited your post to add a second line that increased it's overall politeness, & seeing we're at the top of a new page, I thought I'd edit your quote in...

So Ted Heath is related to Chas Windsor, then?

No, he isn't. So it has fuck all to do with my post.

Nah. Lemme spell it out for you. You scoffed at my tenuous assumption that the closeness of the relationship between charlie & savile is suspicious at the very the least!

Yet right here & on the TV today folk have been suggesting that the relationship between savile & heath points to exactly the same thing. That their relationship is suspicious!

I thought that relevant & that the relevance was clear as day.

I responded to your scorn at my assumption with evidence that others had reached a similar conclusion except they were looking at savile-&-heath instead of savile-&-charlie.

heath appeared on a savile show, charles did not. I'm sure that completely exonerates our future king.
 
Last edited:
I just puked a bit in my mouth. Thanks for that... he always repulsed me that man, long, long before all this shit. I saw him on some 80's ToTP, in the 80's... Urgh!
 
Top