Was it realistic for the guy in the bar to tell deniro to go fuck himself only to get stabbed with a pen by pesci?
What I'm saying was unreal was why was the guy mad at deniro to begin. With
I'm talking when pesci used a pen to stab a guy . but why was the guy mad at deniro for asking about a pen?,was it realistic?
Also he stashes his money in LA and then ginger gets it in las Vegas with his key
Are these movie flaws? Why put the money in LA and then ginger gets it in a las Vegas bank not the LA bank where he puts it earlier in the movie? Movie flaw
Pesci played a sociopath in the film, if you didn't notice.
The dude that got stabbed, he was irritated when de Niro's character simply spoke to the woman that he was obviously trying to seduce. de Niro walked away, and then interrupted again over a trivial pen. The dude obviously either had mob connections or acted like he did, and had to be the big tough guy when some clown interrupts his pussy-gettin' speech. So, he mouthed off to the wrong guy, and that wrong guy didn't even have to say a word for his sociopathic partner to do some pen-stabbing to get the point across that you do not speak to Ace like that without getting a few holes punched in you courtesy of the nearest pointy instrument.
Realistic to me. I've never seen this kind of thing happen but it's definitely stereotypical of early-to-mid 1900's mobster behavior.
As for the money stash.... I just don't know. I don't remember that discrepancy that you do. The movie's so fucking good that little things like that won't bother me until like the 30th time I've seen it.
What bothered me the most about this movie was when they took baseball bats to the brother of Pesci's character. I saw that scene when I was pretty young.... left a strong impression with me.