"the internet is an accelerator and force multiplier of opinion and perception. indignation is its rocket fuel."

alasdair

alasdair
"the internet is an accelerator and force multiplier of opinion and perception. indignation is its rocket fuel."
alasdair
Well I've just discovered that 1 p stuff and think everyone should have a little trip once in a while. I'd even recommend it to my son. It helps you notice stuff that you wouldn't have noticed while on a straight head if you understand me. See things in a new light is a powerful phrase.True, I was proselytysing for the swirlys but I had an open mind that someone might say "Speed saved me from despair".
but you need to frame your question more meaningfully to get any truly meaningful answers really.
I was hoping to draw out any passionate followers of the swirly messiah but I'm a little disappointed in the lack of devout followers. Apart from a handful of us it feels a bit like asking a class of trainee CID at Hendon about their drinking - "it's just a bit of fun and entertainment". Perhaps it's a question of age - maybe if you just start taking drugs when you're 14 out of nothing more than boredom you have a different outlook on them to someone who went to them as medicine.
^^^^agreed!Raasy said:Yet he seems to get away with religious bigotry time and time again because it's towards a Christian
It's disgusting the way Christians are treated on here.
Evey
Well yeah...but it's pretty disgusting how I was made to say the Lords fucking prayer for years in school assembly when I didn't want to. So some of us, rightly or wrongly, just see it as payback. You shove shit down my throat don't be surprised when I'm sick on you later on.
Vurtual said:You seem to have missed this bit of my follow up post: "Just a bit of cheeky wordplay based on how you can make statements like that about vague concepts like 'drugs' and 'religion' which don't mean much in reality; all depending on the specific size and shape of 'generally'."
I wasn't really stating anything i believed, i was cheekily serving your own generalisation back to you to illustrate it's meaninglessness
Vurtual said:I don't make a distinction between animals and humans - what are we, plants? fungus? It's insulting to evolution to pry us apart from the entire superorganism that is life i feel. The little bit of our brains/genes that separates us from the other mammals/crows is not that significant in the great scheme of things - our 'intelligence' sits on top of a whole evolutionary edifice of cognition which is shared by many animals (eg intution) - the bit that makes us different is interesting but on its own (ie without intuition), useless.
Vurtual said:It's also difficult to distnguish natural from artificial highs - is feeling awe from a massive pipe organ in a cathedral artificial? (pipe organs don't grow on trees); for that matter, isn't modern religion artificial, with all it's books and buildings? (Unless it ties itself to some hunter-gatherer shamanic religion which you could argue is more 'natural' (i wouldn't)).
...I'd disagree. There's a very distinct difference: A natural high has to be elicited somehow, largely from our perceived experience. An artificial high however can be elicited from no experiential external stimuli. Hence it's artificiality.
[/hr]
Wow.
If I dare call you anything but "Julie" I'm instantly infracted because I'm not allowed to disagree with your beliefs. Yet you can freely point and laugh if you disagree with mine. Stunning hypocrisy.
I also think you don't understand that we're referring to bigotry and abuse here, not just a difference of opinion.
--
Thread has become over inflated. I'm not victimised here. When Ceres loses an argument he turns to posting stupid memes, and sometimes Shambles chips in when he's in one of his moods. That's about the extent of it.
I'm done. N'night all![]()
Are you saying that bigotry/verbal abuse towards people with religious beliefs different to your own on this forum, is absolutely justified, because you're disgruntled about saying the lords prayer in school 40 odd years ago? Am I getting this right...
It's not like you were forcibly circumcised or anything.
I had annoying jehova witness's disturbing me before. I don't like it, I don't share most of their beliefs... but I at least accept not to abuse someone who I feel is making a mistake, and can politely tell them I do not enjoy being disturbed and to leave. I never see any need for abuse of any kind.
I'm actually quite shocked that a lot of posters on this board seem to have expressed that they believe bigotry and victimisation is acceptable; as long as it's towards religious people. Also quite shocked mods seem to feel the same way, and reflect this by flouting the guidelines completely to support the religious bigots.
Well the difference between our statements is that I actually believe what I'm saying. Yes it was a bit generalised, but I even admitted and expressed that in the original post:
"Drugs generally replace what you're lacking/missing in your own life and only make way to a host of other problems. People should always be looking to improve their own lives and negate their desire for drugs, rather than succumb to them.
Saying that, there is always a time and place for fuckery in a rich and diverse lifestyle."
Having studied psychology for a degree, I can tell you in that field it is considered to be quite a significant psychological difference between humans and animals, and most studies made on animals are ripped to pieces by critics.
I'd disagree. There's a very distinct difference: A natural high has to be elicited somehow, largely from our perceived experience. An artificial high however can be elicited from no experiential external stimuli. Hence it's artificiality.
Self awareness is quite a cool little adaption no doubt - in evolutionary terms it helps with planning, strategy, culture etc. My point is, when sat next to a rock, the difference between my brain and a chimp's brain is minimal - take away the self awareness (or whatever it is) and you've still got a pretty damn clever animal.
As to artifical highs: When i take a psychedelic, what happens doesn't come from nowhere - it magnifies what's already naturally in my mind due to experience - that's why it feels so natural (or weird). This is the same way (imo) that religious devotion, prayer, meditation, incantation etc can close out the world and magnify the divine that's naturally in your mind (it's the same 'divine' as the trip can give access to).
The question is too general as human beings are so complex. For instance some people may need drugs (medication) to survive n without it their quality of life will be deeply affected.
In the recreational sense then again the question is too general. We have human perception n we have that of the addict mind. For an addict the perception is different in that they feel a certain drug (drug of choice / poly drug use) is needed in order for the person to have any quality of life. We know that this perception is distorted because of the things that the addict may have to do in order to seek out out the DOC eg stealing / n lying.
Person whom is not an addict may think that life is shit if they do not have drugs at sometime during the week whether it's illegal, alcohol or whatever but may function without for the rest of the time. And there are the people who like drugs, can take them or leave them n enjoy life either way.
Over n out.
Edit your body also can release chemicals that these drugs seek to rectify if only people realise it for instance the body's natural opiate in preventing pain (why the body suffers pain in opiate WD because these have been depleted by the opiate in question.
Evey
for me life isnt shit its just boring and tbh heroin doesnt make it any less boring its just that it blots out houirs at a time. My best time with drugs was in 88-92 when i was raving and taking industrial amounts of good mdma and acid - if you asked me then if life was shit without drugs i would most likely have said yes.
Knowing the little i do about modern genetics i hesitate to attribute genetic causes to human behaviours - at best there's a genetic influence. The genes have to be understood as part of an interactive system that learns and changes over time - it's difficult to unpick what's due to the initial starting points of the genes and what is due to the experience of the complex system (person) in question (like the relationship between the first few moves and the finished board in a game of Go). According to current science genes aren't simply passive code but an active network - the switching of the genes is varied over time in response to the environment in a constant process of feedback (this switching can even be passed on to children) - the old fashioned fatalistic gene determinism of the 90s is pretty much dead (mainstream accounts of genetics don't seem to have taken this change on board yet) (sorry for the OT; you gave me a chance to get on one of my waffle horses).
I still get out when I can Shambles, but the last time was nearly 2 years ago, and having no mates meant i had to go on my own. No ones interested in me and my boring club music any more, weekends just easier to spend in a nod, waiting for death or redemption. I have 70mls to get shut of and they wont let me even consider reducing - choice of cold turk for the month or keep the handcuffs on, im just not in the position to go out.
Life is not shit without drugs, life is shit when you have a habit. Drugs should be used to enhance your life, not replace it.
I'd disagree. There's a very distinct difference: A natural high has to be elicited somehow, largely from our perceived experience. An artificial high however can be elicited from no experiential external stimuli. Hence it's artificiality.
[/hr]