When you said you have to learn things the hard way, you meant it. Ugh, I know the feeling, I don't stop until the excrement hits the air conditioning.
Funny how that works. Go big or go home. The thing about collapsing in dramatic fashion is that you have no choice in the matter; it's not a drawn out state of miserable limbo that can be lifelong. It's a total fuck up, and in the aftermath there's the clean slate to work with.
Harper hasn't been a Reagan or a Thatcher for you, eh? It's obviously your socialist healthcare system that's to blame.
Harper has got to be the most moderate right winger ever; but I guess he has to be to get/maintain power in the exemplar of liberalism. The vocal left up here hates his guts, but given the options we've had to choose from in recent times he's the only one that seems to have a stable, logical head on his shoulders. As my bro-in-law says; no one really likes Harper, he's just the only reasonable option right now. It is true that he's a hard guy to like; ice cold, smug, not someone I'd like to spend much time around.
I'm sure in the past you noticed my drift towards the right wing side of things, but I've mellowed quite a bit. I honestly think amps can drift one's thoughts to 'everyone for themselves', 'cut off the leeches' kind of shit. Almost Hitler-ish (liked his methamp). Anyways, I find myself in the most uncertain voting position I've ever had; it changes by the hour when I'm thinking about it.
If there's one thing our government knows not to mess with, it's health care. That's such a bedrock principle for what we stand for, to cut it is akin to shutting down food banks and watch people starve.
Even in the peak of my right wingishness I never thought we should reduced spending on health care. I still find it hard to believe the most wealthy nation in the world (US of course) has only recently started to implement socialized medicine/universal healthcare/obamacare/whatever it's called. The rest of the developed world has had it since, well I'm not sure, but I'm thinking it came in the 50s; long time anyway. That's the part that amazes me. What has me scratching my head to baldness in a total state of "does not compute" is the vehement backlash it's gotten. I know those Fox news folks are simply stupid but it's not just them. This day in age in the sole superpower the arguments against universal healthcare are a manifestation of undiluted greed and apathy for the less fortunate.
If there's someone here who disagrees with universal healthcare I know my schpeal is going to seem inflexible, but that's just the way it is. That's my view, and out of all political issues, that's one that is a bedrock principle for the rest of the developed world. No bankruptcy here because you have an incredibly expensive-to-treat illness, and the way we value our system, there never will be.
Sorry for getting overly passionate, I'm a bit drunk, and that just grinds my gears.
