Altered Perception
Bluelighter
I believe my account was unfairly locked and I have a complaint regarding the presumptive behaviour of the moderator who responded on my topic.
To avoid any misunderstanding regarding my rare medical situation I first gave a very clear and descriptive explanation outlining why I felt amphetamines may help me to get my life back after having been beddridden for so long due to chronic fatigue syndrome and hypersomnia causing up to 15 hours of sleep a day.
I explained that I only began to consider amphetamine as a last resort after mild stimulants like coffee and tea failed to benefit in helping me get out of my bedridden state. I also explained that I had a complicated neurological illness which has left me disabled and that i also suffer from a chemical sensitivity due to a damaged autonomic nervous system and for this reason I had avoided the use of any psychoactive stimulants in the past 15 years upon developing my illness.
All I wanted to know was pharmacological suggestions regarding harm reduction in specific to hyperthermia, blood pressure and tachycardia.
I expected some level of criticism regarding my choice to try and treat myself with amphetamines temporarily just until I could get back on my feet and I was willing to further elaborate why I arrived at this choice.
However it bothered me that right away the response I received from the moderator responsible for locking my thread, was a of a skeptical and presumptive nature presented to me in the form of the following reply:
"this is a truly poor tactic to justify to yourself continued overuse of powerful stimulants"
I informed the moderator they were mistaken and once again I found myself repeating my the initial reasons for arriving at this choice, which the moderator had clearly ignored earlier.
My reasons are for wanting to use are purely of a medical nature, there was no other "tactic" or "continuation" or "overuse" as I had been accused of.
Then once again the same moderator replied with more scepticsm saying "Really, I'm not sure what your goal is here. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is, well, a chronic condition, so why would you want the symptoms treated for just several hours total (eg, by trying meth "twice")?" despite the fact that I had already explained my first use would be to reverse my sleep patterns by using the meth to keep me awake during the day so I could sleep at night.
My second use would be for helping me gain just enough energy/motivation to clean the neglected and accumulated mess which had grown in the past year and taken over my room. I believe a cleaner room is the first step to at least psychologically moving forward and making a change.
One of the symptoms of my neurological illness is rapid heart rate when I stand up and to treat that symptom I have been taking the betablocker "metoprolol tartrate" for the last 15 years. But because metoprolol can have adverse effects with stimulants I substituted that for an alpha blocker on the day I had planned on taking the meth. I first started off by taking "carvedilol and then clonodine" as I believed they could potentially reduce some of the hyperthermia and neurotoxicity issues relating to meth as described in medical papers and on bluelight discussions while also reducing my postural induced tachycardia from my neurological illness.
Unfortunately before I even began to take the meth the "Carvedilol and Clonidine" caused a massive drop in my blood pressure. While my heart rate sky rocketed. At that point I realized I needed my usual dose of metoprolol to control my heart rate but because I had already taken the "Carvedilol and Clonodine" I wasn't sure if I could add a third betablocker to the equation without making myself worse. So I immediately called my doctor who turned out to be away on that day. I then began to drive myself to the ER but turned back halfway as I felt a little better.
But when i got home I was still feeling the need to take my usual dose of metoprolol to control my rapid heart rate so I jumped on the forums and posted on my own topic asking if there was anyone around to help me rather urgently.
Upon my post the same moderator who locked my topic, once again began making more presumptions, and this time assuming that I had not contacted my doctor before asking for help. And then the same moderator who had treated me with skepticisms and several presumptions throughout my topic once again posted another assumption that my medical urgency was related to meth rather than the betablockers I had taken as a precautionary measure. And stated that:
"While it's likely that your anxiety is causing increasing physiological alarm (in turn increasing anxiety, and so on)"
And then they locked my topic before I could even reply to any of the presumptions or accusations.
I sent the first involved moderator "seiko" a message explaining the actual reasons I had posted for help and expressed that locking my thread was not warranted. it has now been 4 days and the moderator has not bothered to reply back with any response.
I then also tried sending the same query message the moderator "ebola" who was actually responsible for locking my topic along with all the presumptions and skepticism directed at me. But all my attempts to contact them have continued to fail as they have maintained a full inbox preventing any members from reaching the moderator in question.
For the reasons outlined in my complaint and for the lack of further communication from the moderators involved I am now requesting a second opinion from a senior moderator or an admin as to the behaviour and the locking of my topic. Bluelight served the purpose of reducing harm and yet when i needed help the most i was locked out. There is nothing in the guidelines that say you can only ask for help prior to taking drugs and nay request during or post use will be locked. And ironically I never even got around to taking an active dose of meth as of yet, especially when my only means of support for safe use was unfairly locked.
The locked topic can be found here, thanks:
http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads/707353-How-to-avoid-hyperthermia-on-meth
To avoid any misunderstanding regarding my rare medical situation I first gave a very clear and descriptive explanation outlining why I felt amphetamines may help me to get my life back after having been beddridden for so long due to chronic fatigue syndrome and hypersomnia causing up to 15 hours of sleep a day.
I explained that I only began to consider amphetamine as a last resort after mild stimulants like coffee and tea failed to benefit in helping me get out of my bedridden state. I also explained that I had a complicated neurological illness which has left me disabled and that i also suffer from a chemical sensitivity due to a damaged autonomic nervous system and for this reason I had avoided the use of any psychoactive stimulants in the past 15 years upon developing my illness.
All I wanted to know was pharmacological suggestions regarding harm reduction in specific to hyperthermia, blood pressure and tachycardia.
I expected some level of criticism regarding my choice to try and treat myself with amphetamines temporarily just until I could get back on my feet and I was willing to further elaborate why I arrived at this choice.
However it bothered me that right away the response I received from the moderator responsible for locking my thread, was a of a skeptical and presumptive nature presented to me in the form of the following reply:
"this is a truly poor tactic to justify to yourself continued overuse of powerful stimulants"
I informed the moderator they were mistaken and once again I found myself repeating my the initial reasons for arriving at this choice, which the moderator had clearly ignored earlier.
My reasons are for wanting to use are purely of a medical nature, there was no other "tactic" or "continuation" or "overuse" as I had been accused of.
Then once again the same moderator replied with more scepticsm saying "Really, I'm not sure what your goal is here. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is, well, a chronic condition, so why would you want the symptoms treated for just several hours total (eg, by trying meth "twice")?" despite the fact that I had already explained my first use would be to reverse my sleep patterns by using the meth to keep me awake during the day so I could sleep at night.
My second use would be for helping me gain just enough energy/motivation to clean the neglected and accumulated mess which had grown in the past year and taken over my room. I believe a cleaner room is the first step to at least psychologically moving forward and making a change.
One of the symptoms of my neurological illness is rapid heart rate when I stand up and to treat that symptom I have been taking the betablocker "metoprolol tartrate" for the last 15 years. But because metoprolol can have adverse effects with stimulants I substituted that for an alpha blocker on the day I had planned on taking the meth. I first started off by taking "carvedilol and then clonodine" as I believed they could potentially reduce some of the hyperthermia and neurotoxicity issues relating to meth as described in medical papers and on bluelight discussions while also reducing my postural induced tachycardia from my neurological illness.
Unfortunately before I even began to take the meth the "Carvedilol and Clonidine" caused a massive drop in my blood pressure. While my heart rate sky rocketed. At that point I realized I needed my usual dose of metoprolol to control my heart rate but because I had already taken the "Carvedilol and Clonodine" I wasn't sure if I could add a third betablocker to the equation without making myself worse. So I immediately called my doctor who turned out to be away on that day. I then began to drive myself to the ER but turned back halfway as I felt a little better.
But when i got home I was still feeling the need to take my usual dose of metoprolol to control my rapid heart rate so I jumped on the forums and posted on my own topic asking if there was anyone around to help me rather urgently.
Upon my post the same moderator who locked my topic, once again began making more presumptions, and this time assuming that I had not contacted my doctor before asking for help. And then the same moderator who had treated me with skepticisms and several presumptions throughout my topic once again posted another assumption that my medical urgency was related to meth rather than the betablockers I had taken as a precautionary measure. And stated that:
"While it's likely that your anxiety is causing increasing physiological alarm (in turn increasing anxiety, and so on)"
And then they locked my topic before I could even reply to any of the presumptions or accusations.
I sent the first involved moderator "seiko" a message explaining the actual reasons I had posted for help and expressed that locking my thread was not warranted. it has now been 4 days and the moderator has not bothered to reply back with any response.
I then also tried sending the same query message the moderator "ebola" who was actually responsible for locking my topic along with all the presumptions and skepticism directed at me. But all my attempts to contact them have continued to fail as they have maintained a full inbox preventing any members from reaching the moderator in question.
For the reasons outlined in my complaint and for the lack of further communication from the moderators involved I am now requesting a second opinion from a senior moderator or an admin as to the behaviour and the locking of my topic. Bluelight served the purpose of reducing harm and yet when i needed help the most i was locked out. There is nothing in the guidelines that say you can only ask for help prior to taking drugs and nay request during or post use will be locked. And ironically I never even got around to taking an active dose of meth as of yet, especially when my only means of support for safe use was unfairly locked.
The locked topic can be found here, thanks:
http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads/707353-How-to-avoid-hyperthermia-on-meth
Last edited: