nuttynutskin
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Messages
- 10,736
Win...

Lol hahaha. Don't you just love Americans like Joeof. I swear to god Americans have got to be one of the most one dimensional, selfish, ignorant and dumb people on this planet. Their entire culture is based on greed and superficial wants, and their knowledge of the rest of the world is worse than a ten year old in another country.
Everyone should be allowed to carry again. Guns are illegal in some parts of the world, does that stop the criminals from getting a gun, no, they are criminals, the don't abide by the law. It only stops citizens, so I see where the dumb Americans are coming from.
What I don't get is; dumb, ignorant, colorful extra-large big mac, reality TV driven, money greed capitalistic bullshit American society trusts its citizens to arm themselves to the teeth with war type assault rifles, grenades, sniper rifles and night vision scopes, RPGs, long range scopes, .223 human purpose made killer bullets, large capacity magazines and explosives - BUT they do not trust their citizens with ....drugs. I mean companies that make washing machines and fridges also make missiles for war in America. That is the type of ideology this drungo above is brainwashed in. Heck, its citizens can probably by a cruise missile, ready for launch in case the robber manages to drive away. Yet, they can not be trusted with drugs. Funny ass shit.
It is not our society trying to disarm your cartoon fake free state. It is your society trying to change entire nations' laws and political systems. It is your country that enforces the rest of the world to keep drugs illegal, despite the rise of gangs and criminal elements. All for the chase of the capitalistic dollar. You think you are free? LOL really? I am not talking bout a M60 heavy machine gun...go outside and snort some Cocaine, then we will see how free you think you are. Your government spies on you, all of what you do electronically. You are brainwashed and American dumb. You are far from free...heck even in backward society like Iran's has more free elements than yours. They have drug laws light years ahead of your dumb ass country. How America has became such a unilateral force is beyond me...but like they say, every dog has his day.
Just saying. If the queen of england came to my house and started pushing me around I could put a stop to it. Could you...
I personally think its infringing heavily on our 2nd amendment rights.
They believe it will cut crime...but do not seem to realize that criminal acts committed with assault rifles are generally unregistered(illegal weapons) anyways, so in my opinion taking away rifles will just make it easer for crimes to be committed. They are basically striping the common man of a way to protect his family and property from armed aggressors.
The capacity for damage involved is outweighing actual every day crime in this case. If you're defending your home with an AR-15 or an AK you're extremely irresponsible. Unless it's an armored horde of paramilitary forces invading your home there's no reason to use a weapon that will cut through walls like a hot knife through butter at 200 rpm. .
I would need to see a link to believe this. New york is a nanny state but even this would be a bit much for them.
Why not? If you have a gun and are intent with hurting someone in their home...what's more frightening...a pistol or someone with a rifle? And 200 rpm is far off. Civilian model mags have less than a 30 round capacity. The average is 10 I believe. 5.56 might go through 1 wall at point blank but not 2. Nor through a neighbors house. That's more along the lines of a .50 cal. This I know from experience, as Iv operated the M2 for my profession.
RPM is a rate of fire though, not a mag size. But still, high powered rifles are an awful choice for home defense. I'm sure the most serious about home defense will say the same. Shotguns and pistols are far more practical, they don't have to be scary. They have to fire projectiles that deter or incapacitate a person.
I am actually fine with it I think people in NY should be allowed to elect into office and vote on whatever laws they want. States rights first and foremost.
Wait what? Doesn't this count as big government taking away divine rights or something? Why is it different for states?
^So how is an AR more useful than a shotgun or a pistol?
Also anyone who is confident in their skill as a shot would much prefer a rifle. I am in no way saying that a shotgun or pistol is ineffective. But a shotgun is messy and causes collateral damage where a pistol is less accurate than a rifle.
Using guns for home defense isnt even why the constitution allows them. The only reason we need the 2nd is to protect against a tyrannical government per the founding fathers. An assault weapon would be a very basic tool in the event.