ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop
- Thread starter MyFinalRest
- Start date
bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
A fitting epitaph considering the nature of the thread
superelephant
Bluelighter
"Bill Text
107th Congress (2001-2002)
H.R.2977.IH
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2977
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
October 2, 2001
MR. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
The President shall-- (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and
(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--
(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space."
Beginning around 4:20, a NASA scientist discusses how chemtrails are an ongoing project to study wind patterns within the ionosphere.
107th Congress (2001-2002)
H.R.2977.IH
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2977
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
October 2, 2001
MR. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
The President shall-- (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and
(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--
(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space."
Beginning around 4:20, a NASA scientist discusses how chemtrails are an ongoing project to study wind patterns within the ionosphere.
Last edited:
TruthSpeaker1
Bluelighter
12 saudi/afghani/pakistani men armed with box cutters took down the US/Nato's near trillion dollar air defence system and successfully flew 2 commercial boeing aircraft (which requires hundreds/thousands of hours of flight experience) into one of the largest/busiest air-traffic cities in the world all while coincidentally the US/Nato missle-interception system just so happened to be down for the duration of the attacks.
Project of the New American Century
Heritage Foundation
The question should more so be "how naive are you about the US-world diplomatic power relations that exist today?"
If you answered "huh" or "wtf you conspiracy nut" you either an intellectual who has been brainwashed or just brainwashed stupid.
Project of the New American Century
Heritage Foundation
The question should more so be "how naive are you about the US-world diplomatic power relations that exist today?"
If you answered "huh" or "wtf you conspiracy nut" you either an intellectual who has been brainwashed or just brainwashed stupid.
superelephant
Bluelighter
Thank you, good sir!
Missed this, you're welcome. I feel the background of those in the interviews gives them a unique authority on the subject.
Good to see you still around, hope you're doing well and all that other chummy shit lol.
almost forgot, consider this a request for a comment on my chemtrail post.
Last edited:
bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
Ah, the stupidity of people never ceases to amaze.
superelephant
Bluelighter
^ lol. ok. At least I don't have a boner for AGW. I bet you can't even finish without visualizing this video
But if you're so smart, (which you aren't, considering you posted a pretty damn elementary video concerning heart disease and conceded you found it informative. I also schooled you on polar bear populations awhile back, and that's pretty bad considering your fetish revolves around that sort of thing.) and they are absolutely not spraying anything at all, ever, then explain why meteorologist are having to explain to people that what's showing up on radar definitely isn't rain?
Now, I don't want to read your usually shit you post about how you're a pussy and don't watch vids/click links. Just watch the video.
There are a shit load of these on youtube, I picked the one close to where I call home.
But if you're so smart, (which you aren't, considering you posted a pretty damn elementary video concerning heart disease and conceded you found it informative. I also schooled you on polar bear populations awhile back, and that's pretty bad considering your fetish revolves around that sort of thing.) and they are absolutely not spraying anything at all, ever, then explain why meteorologist are having to explain to people that what's showing up on radar definitely isn't rain?
Now, I don't want to read your usually shit you post about how you're a pussy and don't watch vids/click links. Just watch the video.
There are a shit load of these on youtube, I picked the one close to where I call home.
bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
I'm glad you're so easily misled. Here's another youtube video for you, since you seem to find them so convincing there may be hope for you yet
[video=youtube_share;m5W6APS7D1o]http://youtu.be/m5W6APS7D1o[/video]
bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
[video=youtube_share;EhWpP-vPUcQ]http://youtu.be/EhWpP-vPUcQ[/video]
superelephant
Bluelighter
Yeah, I'm misled by weathermen and women when they are discussing the weather, right.
I don't see a weatherman/women in any of the videos you posted. I was specifically talking about videos that contain weatherman/women explaining what looks like rain on radar but isn't. There are a lot of those videos. (not just random people talking)
So, this where we cross the Rubicon, where the rubber meets the road. You either have to make the case for weatherman/women being entirely incorrect on the subject, or you have to concede that you don't know as much about what going on with the weather/radar and they are probably right. You can't simply post videos that have nothing to do with whether or not weathermen/women know what they are talking about.
superelephant
Bluelighter
bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
I find it quite hilarious that you dismiss the 120 years of climate science but so happily swallow a bunch of idiotic Youtube videos. Meh. Anyway, it's your (as in you wingnuts') thread, so go for your life I guess.
I do tip my hat to you though, this thread got me interested in looking at Youtube vids debunking "alternative theories" and I came across this cracker which has been keeping me amused for the last few hours. A thorough and withering take-down of the Ancient Aliens series from History Channel. An ex-housemate once downloaded the whole series and we smoked a lot of pot and laughed at it, so am very much enjoying seeing it debunked so effectivvely
[video=youtube_share;j9w-i5oZqaQ]http://youtu.be/j9w-i5oZqaQ[/video]
I do tip my hat to you though, this thread got me interested in looking at Youtube vids debunking "alternative theories" and I came across this cracker which has been keeping me amused for the last few hours. A thorough and withering take-down of the Ancient Aliens series from History Channel. An ex-housemate once downloaded the whole series and we smoked a lot of pot and laughed at it, so am very much enjoying seeing it debunked so effectivvely
[video=youtube_share;j9w-i5oZqaQ]http://youtu.be/j9w-i5oZqaQ[/video]
the toad
Bluelighter
Our cars leave "chemtrails" too... Smog... Chemtrails are water vapor and jet fuel smog... Not super healthy but not really any different than gasoline/diesel smog...
I worry more about depleted uranium and the "war on terrorism" and fukushima and tar sands and austerity and the rothschild banking system...
Also china will soon be the most powerful economy and then we might be held responsible for our reign of terror and if they use the same tactics we used in the middle east, theyre just gonna send in airstrikes and anyone with a gun and anyone nearby will be a target..
These guys got caught "throwing their weapons away"...
And the cannon fire from the chopper are all depleted (still very radioactive) uranium rounds.
Sorry to go off topic but chemtrails are such a minor issue even if it is happening...
I worry more about depleted uranium and the "war on terrorism" and fukushima and tar sands and austerity and the rothschild banking system...
Also china will soon be the most powerful economy and then we might be held responsible for our reign of terror and if they use the same tactics we used in the middle east, theyre just gonna send in airstrikes and anyone with a gun and anyone nearby will be a target..
These guys got caught "throwing their weapons away"...
And the cannon fire from the chopper are all depleted (still very radioactive) uranium rounds.
Sorry to go off topic but chemtrails are such a minor issue even if it is happening...
Last edited:
Escher's Waterfall
Bluelight Crew
Chemtrails, LOL.
squidhead
Bluelighter
I always thought "chemtrails" were the trails a person sees when tripping.8(
bloodshed344
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,576
Hmm, why are you spamming? Also, you're displaying quite the hubris even after I proved you wrong on this subject.
Yeah, they're real. Acting as if they aren't is crazy and puts you in the realm of conspiracy theorists.
Also, bit_pattern: Everyone knows Ancient Aliens is full of shit and the fact you spent 3 hours watching a video debunking it shows a slight delay in speed of thought.
bloodshed344
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,576
I don't believe they are significant or a real threat but they are definitely real and anyone denying that (bit_pattern) has a radical view of the world based on fantasy.