• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Can you see "Witchy" eyes?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ninae

Bluelighter
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,522
Call me mad, but it's something I've become increasingly aware of lately, as my "clairsentience" skills, or sensitivity to energies of all kinds has increased (my only psychic skill, as thank God I don't "see" or "hear" things - too much of a wussy).

Anyway, it's a very specific look, and I might as well have called it "demonic" or "dark or "evil, but I like to call it Withcy as I heard it described as such one time (to basically describe someone either actively involved with withcraft or dark forces, unconsciously in touch with that world, or maybe even just a remnant from a past life).

Though I like to be careful about being too judgemental when I speak of these things in relation to individuals, as their situation can all be so different. For many it can be just a temporary phase they go through and then have a complete change-around, while others seem to be born completely innocent and then are misguided in some way. So I am not making crazy judgement calls on anyone, okay. I am only trying to understand something that still is a mystery to me, and maybe others can help shed some light on (I'd also appreciate if I could get input from those who don't have TOO much against me or it tends to be a bit of a waste of time).

Anyway, the look I talk about occur mainly in women. Men have something similar, for sure, but as it's expressed in a masculine way it looks a bit different, and lacks the feminine energy and allure, so I am focusing mainly on women.

Most commonly seen on beautiful, charismatic women, with bright, beautiful, radiating eyes - at least the most successful ones - including many cleebrities, and wellknown loved beauties. I will name just a few, and this might cause quite a stir if they happen to be one of your heroines, but keep in mind most celebrities aren't really that worthy of worship. And no matter what else you might think, I think you'll agree it's all the same look - different eyes but same look behind them.

To describe it I'd say it's basicallly the opposite of an "angelic" look, or the look of a young, child - that is, pure, innocent, good, loving, harmless, and with a certain simplicity or opennness about it, as it has nothing to hide.

The "Witchy" look, on the other hand, can only be described as cold, with capacity for harm/evil, devoid of any innocence/purity, also with a certain complexity and mystery to it, like it has much to hide. They can also be very fascinating, indeed, with great charisma and magnetic powers, and also imbued with great power and intelligence. It is especially effective when occuring in bright, beautiful, radiant eyes - preferably in a female at the height of her youth and beauty.

So this should give you an idea.

I also peronally think this is one of the most fascinating topics out there, and have myself always held a fasicnation with this type of person - both female and male - as I have just recently realised. I guess also based on the law of attraction of opposites, as I find myself more on the other side of the spectrum. This is a very dangerous fascination, however, and I no longer feel so attracted by it now I can see it more for what it is, no matter how enchanting or spellbinding these people can be.

But when you start to gain access to the 4th dimension, the dimension of energy and energies that can be used to enchant and manipulate people, these things lose some of their power over you as you can see through them.

So to show you what I mean, I'll list some female celebrities I can see it in and think has it (some more subtly than others). And I am not directly accusing anyone of anything, as like I said it can be just a temporary state, among other things).

Anyway, here, are some of the more obvious:

- Madonna
- Joan Collins
- Vivien Leigh
- Faye Dunaway
- Priscilla Presley (in later years)
- Shannon Doherty
- Kate Bush
- HRH Princess Madeleine

There are more, just who I could think of now. You can look up pictures for yourself and should be able to see what I mean. You'll notice they all have the same "look" somehow. In this post I have decided to only show you examples of HRH Princess Madeleine, as she is one of the strongest example and so glaringly obvious, I think few could miss it.

So if you've just laughed off me up until now you should be able to see some of what I see, if you have some sensitivity to these things. But you need to be able to separate "positve", "evil" or "dark" energy from "negative", "good" or "light" energy, and good human qualities from bad ones, and be able to see it in someon eyes, their aura, or radiance, etc.

(It may all be one and the same on some level, but not in this world at present, so these things can be seen).

Moving on then...

(This thread will be based mostly on pictures as it shows it the best)

It all started so well...

prmadwebb2gs5.jpg


Can't see it in here here...in fact, she seems more on the side og good or of a positive orientation (influenced by her Mother and Sister who are nothing of that kind). She just looks like a respectable and friendly, young woman.

The change must have happened very gradually..but does seem to have been happening much faster leading to very dramatic changes over the past few years.

princess-madeleine-09.jpg


Something starting to creep in here...a hostile glint in the eyes.


HRH+Princess+Madeleine+Sweden+Monaco+Royal+gOsAcBMdMVol.jpg


Subtle, but it's there.


Madeleine+Sweden+Monaco+Royal+Wedding+Guest+WIDDTQPQvKll.jpg


Hmm...not so good...not so good at all.


princess-madeleine-03.jpg


Hmm...what's this then? High/mad on your own power comes to mind, among other things...not the most sane thing I've ever seen.


HRH+Princess+Madeleine+Swedish+American+Chamber+PUEfQk9It5_x.jpg


And here we finally really have it. The "witchy" look down to a "T". Sums up what I am talking about right here, so maybe now some of you harder to convince are starting to feel it.

Can you see it all in there? And in such radiant, mesmerisingly beautiful eyes (and notably very empowered now). Almost identical to Madonna's eyes at her most beautiful (though I think Madonna still has some love and warmth to her and is not so chilly). Becoming more and more evil and less and less good, Your Highness.


Madeleine1_zpse05ebee7.jpg


Yes, she has it.


460x.jpg


More of the same, she had it bad that day. And those EYES. NO ONE has eyes like that.


dpaphotos728820.jpg


Same thing. Looking more and more like the evil step-mother.

madeleine-estelle-etaar-aop.jpg


Ooh - royal madness? I guess they do everything better.


m2_2379213b.jpg


Aww, what a vision of true love. He looks like a rough, primitive, wife-beater type - with a witch of a wife who can keep him in line. Seems completely indifferent to marrying one of the most desired womenin the world, while her fake "loving" look is creepily chilling.

Wonder what what brought these two togheter, for sure wasn't love or happiness, and you'd think she could make a better catch. No doubt it has something to do with him being a heavy-weight Wall Street Banker, and daddy needing bailing out, perhaps? What is more, she is incapable of loving now.

See how much happier she looked with her previous boyfriend of many years who I believe she genuinly loved, and was a totally different person back then:

madeleine26n-3-web.jpg


And I saved the best for last

5955-princess-madeleine.jpg


Has all the look of some psychotically possessed. Can you say "panto villain"? Like the move cliche of the typical possessed evil psycho, it almost borders on the ludicrous.


Scary...

144039613-princess-madeleine-of-sweden-attends-the-world-wireimage.jpg


WTF is looking at you through those eyes? The exceptional beauty of them only makes it more creepy. I wish she'd wake up one day and find herself looking like Mo Slater.

Frankly shocked she can't find a way to hide it better, but I guess just counting on the lack of sensitivity and understanding of energies, or access to the 4th dimension where these things take place, by most (but this is becoming more common and more of a light is being shone on these things these days). But she seems to have lost control - or rather SOMEONE has taken control over her by now.

Her personal energy has also become sonsiderably stronger, she used to be more of a "background" type", but now it's more Joan Collins/Madonna level. She also has the chilling look of someone who has done something truly horrible and is comfortable with it. I can read people that well. Her change for the worse seems to coincide with her dying her hair dark and getting rid of her trademark blond locks, which frankly made her much more ravishing. Maybe the new spirit has more gothic tastes?

136056d1308315417-king-swedens-formerly-owned-bmw-m5-e39-sale-madde2.jpg



And what a vision she once was - used to be one of my favourite beauty icons, but no more now that she's a monster inside. But I guess those quality of bodies of that kind, especially living in Royal Mansions, are highly coveted by those high up in the demonic ranks. That's all the explantion I can think of right now.

What strikes me the most is that she seems devoid of any soul and that the sweet soul that once was Princess Madeliene is now gone, or long since pushed far into the background. I can only speculate on what agende is going on here, as this is not my speciality, but a sad thing to see, that's for sure.

I'm only curious to how many are feeling me here, or seeing the same, as you would have to be pretty blind. Ope to ideas and would love to hear anyone else's take on it (unless it's just to call me crazy and indulge your love of offending/insulting strangers on the Internet - such a constructive use of time).
Was planning to post pictures of others, but decided it would make the thread to long, and this was the most obvious example. Might include some of those in another post if I find a good one.

By the way, I've already been mediclly diagnosed as mentally unstable and someone who hears voices, so doubt my words will have any bearing on anything in the real world, but as many of us know that doesn't mean to say I am wrong.

So can anyone else see what I see or am I just crazy? I KNOW there is something to it though. Just from those looks and expressions in the eyes, these things don't come about from nothing.

Anyway, that's it for me for now. A little lesson on the world of evil, there, and I know at least some will be able to appreciate. Thought this turned out to quite an interesting little thread.
 
Last edited:
So I am not making crazy judgement calls on anyone, okay.
you seem, to me, to be doing exactly that.

there's a saying that, "when all you have is a hammer everything starts to look like a nail". i think that might be what's happening here...

alasdair
 
I may need to read more (preoccupied for extensive post), but I think you are just projecting, from what I have read.
This woman may have become accustomed in some way of being in the spotlight. Being observed does change the way a person tries to project themselves.

I'm not sure ... but are you suggesting demonic forces are at hand or something?

Perhaps.
Perhaps some level of corruption. But it may not be anything dire. May be pretty normal given circumstances. The ego...
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I was mostly expecting replies like these, and while much of it might be true it doesn't take away from the spirit or energy that is shining out of her eyes (if you are sensitive to feel it). But maybe the lady is just a bit too fair for a man to go along with it. That's also part of the whole point.

I did mention I am clairsentient, which is the "feeling" equivalent of seeing things or hearing thing. Would you say all that can be experinced that way is imagination or delusion too?

I can't really make sense of the way millions of people have been locked up for seeing the same things from the invisible world (ghosts, hearing voices, etc). If they were all different things it would be something different, but when all see the same there's a degree of consistency there that makes it irrational to dismiss it like that. An insane person is living in its own little worth it has constructed for itself, isolated from reality, not sharing experiences with millions of others (if you count all people throughout history).

There's an implication that having psychic skills - mad, which I don't agree with. Just because I happen to feel energies you can't very clearly doesn't really make me mad. You might be able to perceive something I can't and I would respect that. But hey, at least madness can have some genius in it.

Anyway, whatever the underlying reasons might be, I find it hard to believe no one else can pick up on the extremely negative/dark energy, to the point it might as well be called "demonic", regardless if "demons" actually exist or not. There's bound to at least be someone else who can feel what I feel. I've perceived Madonna like that for a very long time, for instance, it's so blindingly obvious. Not to even mention Joan Collins, who even involunterily gave herself away once.
 
I'm not familiar with this lady but her pupils looked pinned in a few of those photos. Maybe she's on opiates there and keeping her eyes open like that purposely. Maybe her handlers had to remind her to open her eyes so she won't appear to be nodding.

Shannon Doherty is known to be a nasty bitch. Now she's doing infomercials about going to college on-line. Career?
Madonna is just evil. Meeeooow Scratch! How about Joan Crawford? She had scary eyes too.
But there's got to be witchy-eyed men out there too. I mean that expression of lacking warmth.
 
Putting someone into the category of good vs. evil depending on how they look is rather draconian, and more than just a bit misguided.

I do think it's completely possible to have empathy to such a degree that you can "read" a person easier than the average joe, and thus form fairly accurate assumptions about their character; but you're always going to be biased based on your own preconceptions of beauty, etc.

What I see from the photos in the OP is someone who has covered up dark circles under her eyes and a pale face with tan makeup to make it appear as though her complexion has colour, but she is really masking deficiency signs. This seems to be common among high profile women who are pressured to always look beautiful in the eyes of the media.

As for a couple of the more salacious appearances, the paparazzi are great at capturing people in the midst of the worst expressions, which they then use to run tabloid stories.

I've stared into people's eyes while on psychedelics, including my own in the mirror, and saw entire universes in there. But it's all just your own projection in the end.

Ninae, I question if you are really "psychic" based on your OP.
 
My apologies Ninea (and others) for my inapprioriate behavior. I came home after a long night of drinking and didn't make a well-balanced decision (i.e. to either keep my thoughts to myself or state them publicly and offend you). Alcohol is not a proper excuse for wrong human action.

So what must I now do to learn from my mistakes? Maybe I can look for some spiritual "guidance" to remove my bad energies and pay a lot of money to read me about angels. Or maybe... I will just take full responsibility for my own actions and the bad way I reacted when I came home and saw another one of your educational and insightful threads on BL with many pictures (the third one already this month, if I recall correctly???).

Anyway, even though I am still of the opinion that your view on the world and self-proclaimed genius (i.e. your "clairsentience" skills, your sensitivity to energies and paranormal realms, your ability to communicate with Angels and Jesus, etc..) radically differs from what I consider "normal" or "rational," it still doesn't give me the right to offend you. Just like I don't have the right to explain the law of gravitation to a person who's heading for a cliff.

Either way, I apologize, if I cannot say anything constructive in the future (which I think I can't in many of your 'esoteric' threads) I will just keep quiet about your posts.
 
Last edited:
Putting someone into the category of good vs. evil depending on how they look is rather draconian, and more than just a bit misguided.

I do think it's completely possible to have empathy to such a degree that you can "read" a person easier than the average joe, and thus form fairly accurate assumptions about their character; but you're always going to be biased based on your own preconceptions of beauty, etc.

What I see from the photos in the OP is someone who has covered up dark circles under her eyes and a pale face with tan makeup to make it appear as though her complexion has colour, but she is really masking deficiency signs. This seems to be common among high profile women who are pressured to always look beautiful in the eyes of the media.

As for a couple of the more salacious appearances, the paparazzi are great at capturing people in the midst of the worst expressions, which they then use to run tabloid stories.

I've stared into people's eyes while on psychedelics, including my own in the mirror, and saw entire universes in there. But it's all just your own projection in the end.

Ninae, I question if you are really "psychic" based on your OP.

Me too.

In fact, I think it's concerning and delusional.
 
Last edited:
I think all the OP intends to say is the common saying: "the eyes are a window to the soul". There is, a lot of truth to that IMO.
 
You see a "primitive wife beater type". I see a guy getting his picture taken. Granted, I also find him less pretty than the other more roundy, not lumpy-headed dude.

Your idea of him is "primitive" as well. I mean this in a negative way, as "primitive" is usually taken.

I have these judgments occur to me as well, but I try to ignore them, by the way. I refuse to accept them even if they are the truth. I maintain doubt in anything final. Fuck final judgments, except my own, and I can't make up my mind, so... Except love. To love. Not to sound cheesy. But love. That's the truth, and that's the only final judgment I can come up with. Fuck judging people based on looking like lumpy headed farmers.

I am also a racist. I try not to be, and I might one line next say I am not a racist, and that would be correct. I usually just mis-identify what it is. Perhaps this is the case with you. And maybe the problem lies with you. That's all you can have any semblance of control over. Yourself, and your decisions. Your judgements (or awareness of, and corrections of). Jesus says Judge not lest Ye be Judged. From what I have read of you, you seem to hold him highly. I see you failing, but perhaps you, like him, fail for a purpose. Still, interesting post. And it makes me think, and question my own judgments, which happen constantly.

I have written in this box many times, and deleted most of what I have written. This post is entirely imperfect, but I am trying.



You really can't judge based on photographs, either. But maybe you can... In the moment the picture was taken... But things change. It can be sunny one second and stormy the next. In my home state it can be 28 one day and 70 the next. Sometimes in the same day.
 
Last edited:
From a psychological stand-point, eye cues can practically reveal a ton of things about a human being, if you learn how to decipher them correctly. A quick search turned up this article.

The Body Language of the Eyes

Some people have this instinctively -- second nature. My mother happens to be someone like that, not obsessive about it, but always uses eye contact as a method of unraveling someones personality. I also happen to be the same way. I can tell tons about an individual through eye contact. It's not witchcraft, or being crazy, just simply body language.
 
Can you really, or are you assuming?

I don't doubt that the ability is there in us, and stronger in some than others... It is only natural. But some of her judgments have just gotten to me, as she is trying to make this a serious topic but failing in respects to provide a platform. I can see some truth in it but it just seems... I don't want to fail at calling it anything general/singular. Something about it just doesn't seem right. Her assuming that the reason why I (not specifically me) can't or don't see is because I am a male and this lady is fair (her opinion), when I have stated, and it is the truth that I am not even notably attracted to her. In fact many of the images quite the opposite. Much of it looks projected/forced... Like she knows she is on camera and is putting on a face/mask. In the last image I see that she posted, I for one still see innocence. But I am not attracted to her. Nice tits, though (checking myself). But not my type. Too tan. I see innocence in many others, as well. Hell, I see innocence in Adolf Hitler, though. Not to say I am wrong, or right... not completely anyways, I believe that Adolf given the right keys and understanding could have been disarmed of his evil, and if a dog is innocent, so is he, no matter how much we try, and are capable of more than dogs. On some level, we are like them, but I don't want to debate about that.

I think a lot is in the eye of the beholder, no matter.

I admit I have burned myself by not trusting my own instincts, but I have also been burned by trusting them. Sometimes it's as if I choose to ignore them, they are right, and if I don't, they are wrong. That may be oversimplification though... But that is what I am also trying to avoid. I try to understand. I try to act with love. I guess even if it burns me.

A lot can be misinterpreted. Like a dog that is fearful of a person who is fearful, and it becomes hostile/attacks (not out of predation, but it all merges/blends together).
 
Last edited:
I see what you're saying.

Of course it's partially an assumption, and not completely definitive, but it would be ludicrous to completely dismiss social/facial/eye/verbal cues and body language as they are an integral tool in human communication/bonding/understanding.

If generalizations are what's irking you, she does tend to do that based on other posts I've read by her, we all have our flaws however. The best thing to do is extract the part(s) of her post that are interesting and generate discussion based on that.
 
No doubt. I do find them interesting. I mean to say that, and have, but I have deleted three posts so far I have driven myself mad over. I fight.

And I project as well.

I agree that we can't dismiss, but I guess I want to say, "So what?", as far as to what is pointed out. It's hard for me to explain why. It is just something I see naturally. I see the human range as a spectrum. I desire to know what is under everything. I see that she is wearing many masks (often one), and this mask has thickened. Or the one that she puts on probably gets thicker. Not that it only goes one direction, or she only has one face.

I try to live fearlessly. Not in a gung ho way, but in a conscious way. I like the saying- I can't quote it directly, but "You are the product of 13.7 billion years of evolution" (or some other number, more specific to this outcome), fucking act like it". That gives me confidence. That grounds me, where before I see so much separation. That calms me. And like you said, the best thing to do is extract the best out of things. Sorry if this block went a bit here and there and maybe doesn't seem connected. I have written many times and have tried to take the best out in a constructive sense, but I drive myself crazy, because I am inherently very judgmental of people. I separate so much. I guess not in the same way as others.

The bit about the guy being the wife-beater though is just wrong to say about someone, without knowing them, or without knowing they do that. I guess some of it was just obsessive, and I attacked, perhaps out of a defensive nature, of others. It is strong in lines, through my family, like others', to do that, when I/we sense someone is being unfairly judged or attacked. It also knocked a hole right in her "I am not being judgmental", because despite her faith in her abilities, she could be wrong.

It is interesting, though, what is brought up, and on some level, we all have some way like this... But what to name these faces? These eyes? Witchy? Are we sure we understand? Some eyes are easy to read. Some eyes, not quite. These eyes are of a person who is on magazine covers that you buy... And I doubt they really want you to know everything about them, either.

...Anyone want to put up a picture of themselves?
Want to take one knowing people are going to do it-this discussed?


Ninae, I am sorry if I come off harsh. I have been called crazy on this forum, and I don't intend to be like that. I wouldn't say that. Not definitively. I am trying to be constructive with what is here.


I am now with the image of a blind, burned-out-eyes (and all he sees is light) Neo on a "cross" surrendering, and letting it all... in. But I guess, a lot has to be done, before that? I don't know. I mean. Yea. And no. It's a choice.

I don't know.
 
Last edited:
For educational purposes only.

Your post makes no sense. I missed out the term 'and'. That is all.

You could do with being less of an obnoxious and snide individual, Psyduck. Do you have any plans in place for that?

The belief that so much can be drawn from a digital photo of someone's eyes IS delusional, and that concerns me. Why does it concern me? Because I worry about the mental wellbeing of my fellow human. And I have heard similar things to the OP from past friends and acquaintances who have later gone on to completely lose their grip on reality.

I would assume that you must have misunderstood my original post.
 
So your saying that when it comes to "digital photo's" cues are nullified. I see a point there, specifically because they're extremely manipulated. I just think delusional is going a bit too far. Many women (and some men perhaps) consider it a pastime to browse a magazine and discuss (more like gossip) about contents based on the mentioned factors. Far cry from "delusional" and "requiring mental help" don't you think?

I think you guys are reading too much into the post itself. There's more than one avenue one could take to discuss a topic.
 
I would assume that you must have misunderstood my original post.
Yes, I was assuming you said Ninea was delusional, which seemed to me the logical interpretation.

You could do with being less of an obnoxious and snide individual, Psyduck. Do you have any plans in place for that?
Well, you don't know me in real life. I am a much more kind, emphatic and tolerant person than my posts in this thread may suggest. But, in the end, there is a limit to tolerance and the validity of the ideas of others. Rationality is the standard for what is right and wrong. And frankly, whatever Ninea has been posting here for months, comes not even close to rationality. And in my eyes [sic.] it's only getting worse. Just be patient, if you have been long enough on BL you can already predict how these kinds of stories typically end.

I think my response was not out of line. It was naturally driven by the same psychological mechanism of racism, fear of the otherness qua otherness, fear of the incomprehensible otherness of people. And to be honest, if my children had pictures floating around on the internet, I would be pretty devistated if Ninea was looking at their innocent faces and claiming my children were demonicly possed and were "actively involved with withcraft or dark forces, unconsciously in touch with that world." If she lived in the same street as I did, I would not even allow my kids to play outside anymore. In my opinion, to put it mildly, the behavior exhibited by the OP is really not healthy.

In the end, whatever people's beliefs are, I don't think we should be universally tolerant. Rationality is the standard for what is acceptable. Therefore people must not expect any gentle response from me whenever they start talking about: psychics, paranormal things, reading people's evil energies from pictures, their ability to communicate with angels, the fact that they hear the voice of Jesus, or their self-proclaimed genius and exceptional gifts that makes them superior beings, etc.
 
Last edited:
lol. i can't claim to have actually read all of that. but i can attest to one schizo roommate bitch i had demanding i was WITCHY. (she meant it badly)
when i was blackmailed into an evangelist living home i was given a talk about witchcraft not being allowed (i wasn't doing any "witchcraft", nor had an interest in it since i was like 12)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top