pinkpapaver
Bluelighter
WHAT ever happened to that god almighty? typical. turning up causing a storm and then disappearing when the people want their answers/dinner
...The Trinity is a whole other matter. Don't think you can find any Christian living or dead who has much of a clue what that's all about. Utter drivel as a concept. Genuinely incomprehensible. Is what happens when you try to turn a fundamentally polytheistic religion into a monotheistic one without tossing out the polytheism properly.
![]()
I don't think it was meant as a "koan" for a second. Is just the product of a tossed-together-over-centuries mishmash religion which is what Christianity is. Any ideas of it being more "deep" than that are distinctly ad-hoc, I'd say.
As for some versions of Christianity being "more sophisticated" than others, I'd tend to agree. But ultimately is all just some bloke's opinion based on nothing of importance. Interpretations without substance.
I'll politely ignore the David Icke comment, PinkP
He's quite hilarious but it's mainly just Theosophy with nobs on.
The Trinity is a whole other matter. Don't think you can find any Christian living or dead who has much of a clue what that's all about. Utter drivel as a concept. Genuinely incomprehensible. Is what happens when you try to turn a fundamentally polytheistic religion into a monotheistic one without tossing out the polytheism properly.
And as for Mary? Date rape deities ftl![]()
I got that about the trinity from karen armstrong - she seems a little fluffy in places, but i largely trust her stuff (as much as a no mark can tell). I know it's thought that way in eastern christianity - certainly it could have originated in a more grubby amalgamation (most of them did).
and i agree with your interpretation of interpretations without substance![]()
I think the trinity was meant by early christians as a paradox like a koan - it was supposed to be 'contemplated' until you saw god - maybe could be seen as a meditational practice. this was the tradition that carried on with eastern orthodox christianity but was taken more literally by the western christians (as mentioned before).
While both to me a bit idiotic (as organised religions) it seems that some bits of christianity have had more sophistication than others at different times (and the western one we inherited came from the theological backwaters...)
edit
Oh i know i'm on dodgy ground with the physics, but i think that's where it is - not to say non-material, but non causal certainly. quantum particles actually behave in a non-material way from our viewpoint (though granted there's obviously material happening, we just can't measure it).
The actual cosmologies being considered by mainstream physics leave plenty of room for all sorts of wackiness - (and i get my physics more from david deutsch john gribbin or michio kaku than david icke!)
He said he would never leave us nor forsake us. He never has.We left Him.