that's a damn harsh indictment. scamming people is obviously pretty heinous but damn hahaaha
/ppl have the responsibility of checking what they consume, and knowing what they purchase, so are responsible in a sense whether they get bunk stuff they trash or whether they eat the wrong thing. obviously there's more factors at play like think of dopeheads dropping dead of fentanyl RC's badly before and on occasion routinely.. scenarios that wouldn't exist were it not for prohibition, of course. but dealing with such things as 'molly' and/or 'china white' where something is purchased but nhot what it was expected, everyone has a hand in that failure from seller to buyer to the ppl who stand in the way of de-criminalizing drug usage
your trafficking charge probably dropped NOT because it wasn't mdxx, but because it sounds as if you only 'trafficked' to the undercovers (which, as a judge, i'd feel wasn't enough to raise you to 'trafficker' legally, not anymore than it'd be appropriate to elevate you to scarface and then blah blah). Your only saving gracde was your claim to ignorance through 'being introduced to it as' molly. but you say you found out, then got it and sold it in capsules (as molly is most commonly sold in many areas), and you sold it as molly. that's no different or better than stamping mde/caffeine/2ci pills adn selling it as E; arguably it's worse, because at least many do understand that "ecstasy"/="pure mdma pill", while "molly" is taken to mean raw mdma powder- as close to pure as chemoistry and/or light, inert cutting allowed; not mda, not "mdma+" blends, and certainly not methylone powder.